Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

nesami

@nesamicrypto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

199subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001930200250
TypeChannel
Username@nesamicrypto
Descriptionссылки на все мои ресурсы: https://t.me/linksnesami много тут не говорим, просто торгуем криптой и кайфуем по всем вопросам сюда - @magomedpnh основной канал по фондовому рынку РФ - https://t.me/+1i7i8yGjgmcwNzIy ютуб - www.youtube.com/@malomoney
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nesamicrypto

Growth

1997 Aug 2026, 12:07 — 199 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:32 — 199 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:078 Aug 2026, 11:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 198–200 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 11:32199no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:07199first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,230
Videos
96
Links
830

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
50s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

88 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6068.2%
🔥1415.9%
👍1112.5%
👏33.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jun 2026, 13:59 UTC94 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🫣 В Portals ввели покупку подарков по СБП Но так покупать можно не все подарки, а только некоторые. Но все же круто

3

Signed magomed

1 Jun 2026, 14:33 UTC100 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

TON хотели переименовать обратно в GRAM, но почему то удалили голосование Вроде даже не фейк новость Говорят типо один из шагов MTONGA (Make TON Great Again)

2🔥2

Signed magomed

8 May 2026, 13:02 UTC120 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хорошо, что напомнили кто основатель телеграмма, а то я забывать начал

5🔥1

Signed magomed

7 May 2026, 09:53 UTC110 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рекомендую вам поизучать тему с TON DNS Domains Они сейчас не особо зафоршены, поэтому за 100 TON (примерно $200) можно взять себе домен с 4 буквами (например, сейчас такие юзернеймы стоят минимум 5000 ton) Я вчера взял себе один с 4 буквами и планирую взять сегодня еще несколько более больших, но смысловых. Заходи на сайт, сидите тупо перебираете домены и ищите то, что звучит круто и не занято Если есть возможнос

🔥32

Signed magomed

7 May 2026, 05:45 UTC70 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хорошо живем Такими темпами и до $6 вырасти можно

3

Signed magomed

7 May 2026, 05:44 UTC66 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tonprices

2.87$

3

Signed magomed

5 May 2026, 21:08 UTC78 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Это нормально вообще?

4

Signed magomed

4 May 2026, 14:55 UTC84 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дуров выложил такой вот пост: ⚡️ Сборы в TON упали в 6 раз — почти до нуля. Следующий шаг — Telegram заменит TON Foundation в качестве движущей силы TON и станет его крупнейшим валидатором. ⚙️ Акцент смещается на техническое превосходство. 🧩 Новый ton.org, новые инструменты для разработчиков, новые улучшения производительности. 🧭 График — 2-3 недели. 🪙 Это шаг 3 из 7 на пути к снова сделать TON великим. Неужел

4

Signed magomed

3 May 2026, 11:30 UTC74 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рынок подарков потихоньку восстанавливается За последний месяц почти все подарки показывают рост: Топ-10 по росту: 🎁 Swag Bag — +55.56% 🌸 Sakura Flower — +37.46% 🎁 Snoop Cigar — +33.15% 🎂 Homemade Cake — +32.76% 🎁 Ginger Cookie — +32.22% 🎁 Happy Brownie — +31.88% 🎁 Record Player — +31.36% 🍭 Lol Pop — +26.49% 🎁 Fresh Socks — +26.32% 🔤 Trapped Heart — +26.27% Капитализация в USDT также выросла — +7.23%, достигнув 1

3🔥2👍1

Signed magomed

30 Apr 2026, 21:09 UTC69 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вышел новый мишка на первое мая 🎁

3

Signed magomed

30 Apr 2026, 18:28 UTC73 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Сегодня ждем новые подарки или улучшения

3

Signed magomed

23 Apr 2026, 17:49 UTC94 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✈️ Уже скоро в TON будет НУЛЕВАЯ КОМИССИЯ Павел Дуров заявил, что через неделю комиссии в сети TON снизятся в 6 раз — до 0.00039 TON (≈ 0.0005 $) за транзакцию После этого часть транзакций станет полностью без комиссии — MTONGA. Make TON Great Again

4

Signed magomed

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nesamicrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 993,299 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“nesami” (@nesamicrypto), 199 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nesamicrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.