Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Занудство как искусство

@nerd_art

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

698subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001784541052
TypeChannel
Username@nerd_art
DescriptionПросто канал очень занудного человека На Дзене допканал с фотками и рассказами о поездках и прогулках https://dzen.ru/id/5ce55c5e81437800b318fb3d?share_to=link
Created19 September 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nerd_art

Growth

6986 Aug 2026, 00:56 — 698 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 16:37 — 698 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 00:566 Aug 2026, 16:37
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 697–699 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 16:37698no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:56698first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.8%
avg views ÷ 698 subscribers
Avg views / post
103
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (3 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,548
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,340
Videos
50
Links
1,310

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1840.0%
👍1635.6%
🔥715.6%
👏24.44%
💯12.22%
🤔12.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC44 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @forbesrussiaPhoto

«Евротранс» — крупнейший независимый оператор АЗС «Трасса» с выручкой 266 млрд рублей — 5 августа впервые допустил полноценный дефолт по облигациям, не выплатив купон по бондам с погашением в 2030 году. Это первый за последние годы дефолт компании такого масштаба, выпустившей облигаций на 37 млрд рублей и еще недавно имевшей рейтинги высшей группы надежности. Остальные выпуски пока в статусе технического дефолта. Те

5 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC85 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

А вот ради этого я и попёрлась в Гороховец. Деревянный модерн, на котором я помешалась сильнее, чем на наличниках 😍 Ну и, как я понимаю, он тут слегка разбавлен псевдорусском стилем, впрочем, они вполне себе родные братья. Обидно, что таких вот чудесных теремов совсем не много. Только в Кимрах я наблюдала чудо, что буквально каждый третий дом в городе относился к деревянному модерну - но, к сожалению, в состоянии пол

🔥43👍1

5 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC89 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну а поскольку после Грузии у меня случилась острая нехватка наличников в организме, я нынче подорвалась и умотала в Гороховец. Очень рекомендую: город размером с нефига, маленький, лучше посетить проездом, а не как я 🤣 Но наличники и деревянный модерн (попозже покажу) здесь в достаточном количестве и оч красивые! UPD Тринадцатый город из двадцати, между прочим! Потихоньку иду на опережение плана 😛

👍3

5 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC90 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

И ещё в продолжение этой темы. Соседи по складу с высоким риском стать целью будут нежелательными только до того момента, пока налёты имеют логику "к этим летим, потому что (причина)". Если всё это перецдёт в парадигму неизбирательных атак на любые объекты хранения, суета с выбором соседей резко станет неактуальной.

💯1

5 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC98 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Перечитала текст РИА и заметила два тезиса, которые важны вместе. Первый - Со стороны арендаторов складов в России в июле выросло внимание к пожарной безопасности <...> и профилю соседних арендаторов. Второй - Эксперты также отметили рост востребованности более мелких складских блоков. Средняя площадь арендной сделки в первом полугодии 2026 года составила 9,3 тысячи кв м против 11,5 тысячи кв м годом ранее, наибольш

🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC118 viewsread 6 August 2026

⬆️ Пока лучшее по теме, что я видела. Молодцы, команда РИА!

4 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC110 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ria_realty

☝️☝️☝️Арендаторы складских площадей в России в июле повысили внимание к соблюдению собственниками объектов требований безопасности, сообщил @ria_realty руководитель компании по управлению коммерческими объектами Roiteam Иван Шевцов. "Со стороны арендаторов складов в России в июле выросло внимание к пожарной безопасности, резервному электроснабжению, инженерным системам, охране объекта и профилю соседних арендаторов.

4 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC116 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

На ночь глядя Поскольку далеко не все знают мой ФБ и личный аккаунт, а похвастаться хочется, докладываю: сегодня встретила в лесу кокетливого лося, который терпеливо стоял в инстаграмной позе, пока я его фотографировала. Точнее, сперва я долго к нему подкрадывалась, молясь одновременно чтобы не убежал и чтобы не психанул и не прибил меня. Но в итоге вот - портрет лося! Страшно горда собой (и лосем) хз почему 🤪

13👏2

4 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC112 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Мой прекрасный чатик заставляет меня думать о еде. Точнее, о продуктовой инфляции, и вот что пришло мне в голову. Есть такой популярный тезис, что у продуктового магазина всегда будет арендный поток, потому что люди всегда едят. Только это лукавство. Люди экономят на еде, и в случае кризиса снижают количество и/или качество потребляемой пищи. Помните ту самую гипотетическую бабушку, которая разоряет сети, когда ходит

4 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC102 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @russianmacroPhoto

‼️🔥 ПОТРЕБИТЕЛЬСКИЙ БУМ ПРИ ЗАМЕДЛЕНИИ РОСТА ДОХОДОВ Продолжаем вчерашнюю тему про доходы/расходы Рост доходов замедлился (7% гг в 1П26), но расходы во 2К26 ракетой взлетели вверх 🚀 Покупка товаров и услуг: 19.5% гг – это max годовой прирост с 2К21; тот скачок был связан с эффектом низкой базы, сейчас же этого нет, поэтому налицо РЕКОРДНЫЙ РОСТ РАСХОДОВ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ Взлёт расходов связан с тем, что люди стали меньше

🤔1

4 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC113 viewsread 6 August 2026

⬆️ Уже позавчерашка, но всё же. В прогнозе ЦБ указал среднюю ставку по году 14,6%, то есть (см расчёты в цитируемом посте) больше снижений не будет! Вечно я забываю на прогноз среднего значения посмотреть. Между тем кто-то из Сбера недавно заявил, что геликоптер бабло нихт, ОФЗ покупать не будем. Как это бьётся с не опускаемой ставкой - х его з...

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @nerd_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 142,388 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Занудство как искусство” (@nerd_art), 698 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nerd_art.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.