Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

(closed) 𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘣𝘦𝘭

@nerbelll

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002169465363
TypeChannel
Username@nerbelll
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nerbelll

Growth

272827.512 Aug 2026, 10:34 — 27 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 10:45 — 27 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 02:13 — 28 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 10:3413 Aug 2026, 02:13
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27–28 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:1328+1
12 Aug 2026, 10:4527no change
12 Aug 2026, 10:3427first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nerbelll. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 February 2025 to 3 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2025, 14:12 UTCviews —

(closed) 𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘣𝘦𝘭 pinned «новый кн @nerbels фастом подписались все»

3 Aug 2025, 14:12 UTC60 viewsread 12 August 2026

новый кн @nerbels фастом подписались все

Signed салимøva

3 Aug 2025, 14:10 UTC60 viewsread 12 August 2026

привет винтервайб дцрв

Signed салимøva

10 Feb 2025, 07:55 UTC325 views0 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @kileaxxx

Родные и уважаемые владельцы ролевых и флудов имеется группу с владельцами, где мы общаемся делимся чем-то, помогаем и прочее другое, если есть владельцы то можете присоединиться, будем рады вас видеть. Главное когда присоединитесь напишите название вашей рк/фд и ссылку на тгк https://t.me/+cpHVd2eJosA1MGQ6

Signed 𓍼 амеля ᵒʷᶰ ᶰᵉʳᵇᵉᶫ -.

9 Feb 2025, 18:30 UTC364 viewsread 12 August 2026

кто хочет перезаключить ( ЕСЛИ Я ОТКРОЮСЬ ) - пишите под коммы

Signed 𓍼 амеля ᵒʷᶰ ᶰᵉʳᵇᵉᶫ -.

9 Feb 2025, 18:25 UTC349 viewsread 12 August 2026

...

Signed #blaimova“ (🥊) ᵒʷᶰ ᶻᵉᶰᶫᶦˣ

9 Feb 2025, 18:23 UTCviews —

(closed) 𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘣𝘦𝘭 pinned «мы закрываемся, сложно говорить. за январь и февраль я перегорела полностью , не считая той грязи - которая была полита на меня. за все ссоры я хочу извинится. я безумно буду по вам скучать, вернусь с этим же названием, но под другим ником. оставлю подписку…»

9 Feb 2025, 18:23 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 12 August 2026

мы закрываемся, сложно говорить. за январь и февраль я перегорела полностью , не считая той грязи - которая была полита на меня. за все ссоры я хочу извинится. я безумно буду по вам скучать, вернусь с этим же названием, но под другим ником. оставлю подписку только на закрепы. в сфере действительно комфортно, но это не для меня. обнимаю 💘 #NERBELmegarp

Signed 𓍼 амеля ᵒʷᶰ ᶰᵉʳᵇᵉᶫ -.

9 Feb 2025, 17:31 UTC250 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @marbles_original

Перезагрузка завершена!! Мы сменили юз Был: @marbles_Loven Стал: @marblest_original Прошу сменить в союз листах и постах где он был!! #рп

Signed 𓍼 амеля ᵒʷᶰ ᶰᵉʳᵇᵉᶫ -.

9 Feb 2025, 17:28 UTC211 viewsread 12 August 2026

шикарно, спасибо за ассоциацию ❤️‍🔥

Signed 𓍼 амеля ᵒʷᶰ ᶰᵉʳᵇᵉᶫ -.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nerbelll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 875,633 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“(closed) 𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘣𝘦𝘭” (@nerbelll), 28 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nerbelll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.