Channel
@neptun_laza
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
432subscribers
+29 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002520998508 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neptun_laza |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neptun_laza |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 432 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 427 | +10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 417 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 411 | +8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 403 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 403 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
121 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 47 | 38.8% | |
| ❤ | 40 | 33.1% | |
| 🥰 | 18 | 14.9% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 9.92% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.31% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
♎️Весы 24.09 - 23.10 Сегодня будут удаваться напитки. И не стоит думать, что это слишком просто - сварить хороший кофе не каждому под силу. ♏️Скорпион 24.10 - 22.11 Звезды радостно сообщают, что день идеально подходит для поглощения блюд французской кухни. К счастью, это вовсе не означает, что вам придется есть лягушачьи лапки. Хотя - почему к счастью? Они тоже весьма недурны на вкус. Но в любом случае у французов е…
👍1
♈️Овен 21.03 - 20.04 Сегодня вам может представиться случай блеснуть своими кулинарными познаниями перед весьма изысканной аудиторией. Берите быка за рога, оставленное впечатление может здорово вам пригодиться, причем в самый неожиданный момент. И постарайтесь не сесть в лужу. Ибо если вдруг окажется, что среди присутствующих есть кто-то, кто знает, что вы неправильно произнесли название некоего хитрого блюда, выгляд…
👍1
Video, posted without a caption
👍1
Video, posted without a caption
❤1👍1
Video, posted without a caption
❤1👍1
Video, posted without a caption
👍1🔥1
♎Весы 24.09 - 23.10 Не скромничайте, сегодня это абсолютно ни к чему. Хотите съесть слона - ну и ешьте, незачем пытаться скрыть свой хороший аппетит только потому, что вам кажется, что много кушать - неприлично. Ваша задача - утолить голод, и звезды весьма рекомендуют не пренебрегать в этом деле ничем, начиная от полноценного завтрака, заканчивая ужином. ♏Скорпион 24.10 - 22.11 Сегодняшний день попахивает авантюризм…
👍3❤2🥰2
♈Овен 21.03 - 20.04 Нынче вам спешить некуда. Да и не получится - этот день обещает заметное замедление темпа жизни. Самое время для долгих и вдумчивых трапез, таких, как традиционно сибирский способ есть манты или пельмени. Потихоньку, со сметаной (некоторые, правда, предпочитают с уксусом), подносимые небольшими порциями, чтобы не остыли, и до тех пор, пока они не заполнят в организме все свободное пространство. То…
👍3❤2🥰2
Video, posted without a caption
👍3👏2🔥2
Video, posted without a caption
👍3❤2🔥2
Video, posted without a caption
❤3🔥3👏2
Video, posted without a caption
❤3👍3🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @neptun_laza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лазаревский НЕПТУН 🔱 2026” (@neptun_laza), 432 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neptun_laza.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.