А ещё тут примерно в целом метров 20 обработки краев…. Вручную без оверлока, каждый сантиметр подгибался на 0,5 см и потом ещё на 0,5 и прошивался в миллиметре от края
🔥4❤3

Channel
@nepokazivaimame
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
44subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001155007047 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nepokazivaimame |
| Created | Between 1 December 2018 and 23 April 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nepokazivaimame |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 44 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 45 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 45 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 23 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
95 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 41.1% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 31.6% | |
| 😁 | 22 | 23.2% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 4.21% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2022 to 20 May 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А ещё тут примерно в целом метров 20 обработки краев…. Вручную без оверлока, каждый сантиметр подгибался на 0,5 см и потом ещё на 0,5 и прошивался в миллиметре от края
🔥4❤3
Примерно через 10 истерик я сделала это….
🔥9❤2😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤12🔥3
Буду встречаться с конструктором в четверг и обкашливать вопросики) Но сегодняшний день объявляю днём ржача 🤡
❤1😁1
Ожидание пышности юбки/реальность
😁3😢1
Ожидание/реальность
😁8❤1😢1
Ну что ж….. Пока что из нашего первого изделия можно можно делать мем ожидание/реальность))) Конструктор очень крутая женщина, училась в Италии, работает в сфере уже цать лет, преподаёт конструирование….. Как вы думаете, можно звездиться уже от того, что когда я только посмотрела на лекала и начала их вырезать, я сразу по двум пунктам поняла, что это провал? ⭐️⭐️⭐️ Фото на посмеяться ниже оставлю 😂
Уже на моменте раскроя появляются вопросы)) не знаю во что выльется макет, очень интересно посмотреть… Я вижу, что уже некоторые делали я точно делала бы по-другому Но конструктор не я, так что 🤐
❤3😁1
Отшивают макет
🔥3
Вы знали, что профессии Швея с недавнего момента в России просто не существует? У нас пару лет назад убрали все профильное образование в этой области. То есть есть дизайнеры, есть конструкторы, а швей…. Их не существует. Остались лишь какие-то курсы, которые учат очень поверхностно и мало по времени. Поэтому когда юный дизайнер, гений формы и мысли, придумывает сделать свою коллекцию, он сталкивается с тем, что швеи …
❤8
Всем доброго вечера, друзья :) Я еле нашла швею на макеты. Договорилась с ней две недели назад, что мы отдадим есть вещи на макет через две недели. Она сказала: «хорошо, хорошо, вы напишите, как будут лекала» Я написала ей ровно через 2 недели как и обещала. В ответ услышала, что взять она работу сейчас не может. То же самое произошло примерно ещё с 8 другими швеями.( одна из них мне сказала, что она под следствием, …
😁4
Немного про вайб как я получала Контакты швей:
😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nepokazivaimame. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nepokazivaimame” (@nepokazivaimame), 44 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nepokazivaimame.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.