2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 01:47
5
no change
9 Aug 2026, 11:03
5
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 16 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
4
Videos
3
Links
7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 33s
Average length
1m 11s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
10
83.3%
👏
2
16.7%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2024 to 14 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟چه کسی چشمهای شما را به واقعیت باز میکند؟
به بهانه روز پژوهش، کوشش دوستانی را که واقعیتها را جستجو کرده و به دیگران ارائه میکنند، صمیمانه قدر میدانیم.
به راستی، جهان چگونه میشد اگر برای درک، تصمیم و آگاهی، حقیقتی کشف نمیشد و مسیرها تاریک میماند؟
پژوهش، چراغی است که مسیرهای ناشناخته را روشن کرده و کسبوکارها را از افتادن در دام حدس و گمان نجات میدهد. هر تصمیمی که بر پایه دادهها و تحلیل دقیق گرفته شود، یک…
🌟 خلق تجربههای شگفتانگیز؛ هنر برندینگ در لمس عواطف و خاطرات 🌟
آیا برند شما تنها یک محصول ارائه میدهد یا دنیایی از حسها و خاطرات ماندگار میسازد؟
در دنیای امروز، موفقیت برندها فراتر از کیفیت محصول و خدمات است. برندهای پیشرو با تمرکز بر تجربههای عاطفی و حسی، پیوندی عمیق با مشتریان خود برقرار میکنند و از یک تعامل ساده به بخشی از زندگی و خاطرات مشتریان تبدیل میشوند.
در این مقاله، به بررسی راهکارهای کلیدی پرداخته…
تجربهها توی ذهن مخاطب ما چه شکلی ثبت میشن؟
چی باعث میشه این تجربه بهتر به یاد بمونه؟
توی مدیریت تجربه مشتریان و کارکنان، قدم مهم و اول اینه که ویژگیهای خودمون رو بعنوان انسان بشناسیم تا براساس اونها بتونیم تجربه خوب و جذابی رو برای مخاطب طراحی کنیم.
مخاطب، تجربهای که از ما داره رو بعنوان یه خاطره خوب یادآوری کنه و به دیگرون هم بیان کنه.
مقاله جدید ما، به ابعاد تجربه و داستان شکل گرفتن اون میپردازه. توی این مقال…
🌟حواس پنجگانه؛ پل ارتباطی میان برند و ذهن و قلب مشتری🌟
برند شما فقط محصول یا خدمت میفروشه، یا با تجربهای چندحسی راهش رو به قلب مشتری باز میکنه؟
وقتی برندها از قدرت حواس استفاده میکنن، تجربهای خلق میشه که نهتنها به یاد میمونه، بلکه حس وفاداری رو هم در مشتری تقویت میکنه.
آیا شما هم تجربهای از این نوع ارتباط با برندی دارید که در ذهنتون موندگار شده باشه و خاطرهای بهیادماندنی براتون ساخته باشه؟
نظرتون و داست…
تا به حال به این فکر کرده اید که چرا برخی برندها همیشه در ذهن شما باقی می مانند؟
راز آن در تجربه مخاطب نهفته است! 🌟
در اولین مقاله وبلاگمان، با عنوان "تجربه مخاطبین برند؛ کلید طلایی موفقیت کسب و کار شما" به بررسی عمیق تاثیر تجربه برند بر موفقیت کسب و کار پرداخته ایم.
برای درک بهتر این موضوع که چگونه می توانیم با ایجاد تجربیات به یادماندنی، مخاطبان خود را به طرفداران وفادار تبدیل کنید.
@farshidbolouri
حتما مقاله را د…
بازی ما ارائه بهترین راهحل از دل تجربههای ماست و با هر حرکت، افق جدیدی از توانمندیهایمان را برای شما آشکار میکنیم.
www.neovisioncg.com
@neovisioncg
#نئو_ویژن #گروه_مشاوره_نئو_ویژن
#مشاوره_کسب_و_کار
#neo_vision #neovisioncg #neo_vision_consulting_group
گروه مشاوره کسب و کار نئو ویژن
راهی که همیشه روشن است!
نئو ویژن، بیش از یک شرکت مشاوره، یک همنشین توانمند برای رسیدن به اهدافتان است. تیمی از استراتژیستها، طراحان و مجریان با تجربه، آمادهاند که به چالشهای کسبوکاری شما راه حلی نوآورانه ارائه دهند. تیم ما همیشه آماده است که شما را در راه بهبود و رشد همراهی کند.
www.neovisioncg.com
@neovisioncg
#نئو_ویژن #گروه_مشاوره_نئو_ویژن
#مشاوره_کسب_و_کار
#neo_vision #neo…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @neovisioncg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 582,780 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@neovisioncg named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@neovisincg named in 2 posts, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
@faezehsokhanvar named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Neo Vision Consulting” (@neovisioncg), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neovisioncg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
