Channel
@neosoznanniykobachok
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
325subscribers
+230 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002139604706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neosoznanniykobachok |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neosoznanniykobachok |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 325 | +66 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 259 | +166 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 93 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 94 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 95 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 95 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 8 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
132 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 41 | 31.1% | |
| custom 5355014324718949436 | 31 | 23.5% | |
| custom 5438115920352388097 | 23 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5402182883924256598 | 15 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5305482395334502740 | 8 | 6.06% | |
| custom 5400363265194732040 | 4 | 3.03% | |
| custom 5429132240338581172 | 4 | 3.03% | |
| custom 5303536959833007743 | 2 | 1.52% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 1.52% | |
| custom 5256257216809287394 | 1 | 0.758% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.758% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 15 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @neosoznanniykobachok. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 December 2025 to 15 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Рубрика: "Графический дизайн. Календарь"🦊🌠 Посты раз в месяц еще актуальны? Всем привет, сегодня закончила календарь с моим любимым произведением. На протяжении времени занималась только им, так что я более менее горжусь этой работой #Графическийдизайн
❤3
Я выбрала 3-х человек для пачки реквестов, тех кого выбрала отметила 🔥 Тех кого не выбрала, не расстраивайтесь, вы просто попадете в следущую пачку, всех успеем нарисовать, учитывая как я сейчас хочу эксперементировать со стилем, подачей и т.д. 🌸
Ой, чуть не забыл! Мой давний друг подарил мне вот такого прекрасного Джекса на праздники. Он приехал уже довольно давно, но показать то надо :ррр Я оставлю вам его тгк @AKIHIRODUBBER Можете заглянуть, он там озвучки делает и всякие другие приколюхи 😎
❤5custom 54381159203523880972custom 53035369598330077431
Вот иногда мне кажется что мой стиль не слушается меня и меняется как ему угодно.. Хотя наверное так и есть В любом случае мне нравится результат (Кроме фона, но я доделывал уже ночью, так что не столь критично) Автор персонажа: @golubkaurr
❤4custom 53054823953345027402custom 54381159203523880972
После этого арт пойду делать реквесты, так что радуемся, скоро некоторым достанутся халявные артики Ничего не обещаю по стилю, я все еще эксперементирую, но надеюсь вам понравится
❤2
Рисуем жестка, снова Использовала рефы для этой работы Персонаж: @golubkaurr
custom 54381159203523880974❤2custom 53054823953345027401custom 53550143247189494361
Шедевро коллаб с @golubkaurr Персонаж слева мой (Ее зовут Попи) и был переделан с адопта под полноценного персонажа лишь бы была возможность бить персонажа справа (Это Дмитрий, даммы и господа).Впринципе их вайб этот коллаб полностью передает, хахах Вот так вот, возможно наконец верну каналу прежний вид и буду в нем делать интерактивчики по типу ловилок, возможно соберемся еще художничками и сделаем большую коллабу…
custom 54381159203523880975❤2custom 53054823953345027402custom 53550143247189494362
Это мой главный шедевр на 1 апреля
❤7
Йоооу, @golubkaurr люто наскетчила комикс с нашимт персонажами, мой в очках, такой важный, хахпхах 😎😎 Я тоже буду больше скетчить вероятнеее всего, хочется заниматься творчеством по больше, нежели рисовать ради рисования, думаю это довольно разные вещи
✍2custom 54381159203523880972❤1custom 53035369598330077431custom 53054823953345027401custom 54003632651947320401custom 54291322403385811721
Поделюсь с вами коммишкой, дико понравилось ее рисовать, ведь персонаж до жути напоминает одного из моих персонажей Персонаж принадлежит: @nesttwiksix
custom 54381159203523880976custom 54021828839242565984❤3custom 53550143247189494362
Хопа!Не ожидали?А я пришел) Я знаю что сейчас будет большой отток людей, но мне это не столь важно, мне важно показать что я нарисовал во время своего довольно большого застоя Во 1 я изменил стиль Во 2 в новом стиле я нарисовал 2 арта для @golubkaurr Надеюсь вам зайдет мой новый стиль, ведь мне он стал более комфортным за последнее время Возможно возьму пару реквестов и все таки нарисую их
custom 535501432471894943612❤4custom 53054823953345027402custom 54381159203523880972
Коллаб с Тёмным Бруммммсом Решили жестко замутить новогодний коллаб
custom 540218288392425659811custom 53550143247189494365❤2custom 54291322403385811722🐳1custom 52562572168092873941
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @neosoznanniykobachok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Против ли вы репостов в этом тгк?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 15 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Неосознанный кобачок” (@neosoznanniykobachok), 325 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neosoznanniykobachok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.