Естественное ПРАВО на постижение мира на родном языке они называют «экспериментом» 👇
👍23😁3

Channel
@neonomadPPL
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
824subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001450055019 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neonomadPPL |
| Description | Канал единства Кочевников Великой степи. НЕОНОМАДЫ: древнее содержание - новые формы! Обратная связь по электронной почте: Neonomad_email@protonmail.com |
| Created | 4 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neonomadPPL |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 824 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 824 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 25 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
380 reactions across 18 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 136 | 35.8% | |
| 💯 | 48 | 12.6% | |
| 🔥 | 48 | 12.6% | |
| 🤬 | 34 | 8.95% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 5.26% | |
| 😡 | 13 | 3.42% | |
| 🙏 | 13 | 3.42% | |
| 🤡 | 13 | 3.42% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 2.63% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 2.37% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 1.58% | |
| 🖕 | 5 | 1.32% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 0.789% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.789% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 0.789% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.526% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 0.526% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 0.526% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.526% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.526% | |
| 6 further kinds | 6 | 1.58% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 380reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2024 to 23 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Естественное ПРАВО на постижение мира на родном языке они называют «экспериментом» 👇
👍23😁3
В некоторых школах Улан-Удэ уроки будут идти только на бурятском языке Чтобы дети знали родной язык, не просто изучая его, а общались на нем, в Бурятии будут проводить эксперимент - в некоторых школах преподавать предметы будут полностью на бурятском языке. Для этого переведут все учебники. Это потребует большого финансирования. Поэтому начинают с перевода четырех учебников для первого класса: математики, окружающ…
👍44🙏9❤1👎1
Украинцы демонстрируют стойкую способность к пробиванию расистского дна. У них теперь уже и "корейцы это Орда"... 😅 Напрашиваются два вопроса: 1. На каком вообще основании европейцы претендуют на статус "развитой цивилизации", если они не в состоянии различать очевидные вещи?.. 2. Правда ли, что подсознательные страхи однажды реализуются?.. И можно ли считать страхи европейцев относительно Орды пророческими? 😜
🔥20🤡8👍2💯2😁2🤔1🤣1😈1
Цэевропейские каналы опять демонстрируют традиционную расовую слепоту - на этот раз не смогли отличить казаха от корейца. Но это ни в коем случае не расизм. А солдаты издеваются над пленным, заставляя заучивать стихи на украинском языке. Но это не нарушение конвенции по обращению с пленными. https://t.me/exilenova_elit_chat/188592
🤬7😁4👍3🤣1😢1
Кадыров объявил кровную месть высокопоставленным чиновникам из других кавказских республик. Если это не начало развала, то уже точно четкие очертания того, что завтра будет с Московией, когда страна прогрузится в резню между регионами… https://youtube.com/shorts/5mAar4flJ6s?si=OFmsPyITRuTlW-1l
🔥9👍1👎1🖕1
Скоро в Уфу приезжает Путин. Посмотрим, арестуют ли его башкиры… 👇
😁10🔥2🤔1🤣1🤩1
Сегодня по Уфе ездила военная техника. Как оказалось, это были совместные учения ФСИН, МВД, Росгвардии и МЧС Подписаться на ufa_rb ✔️
🤬16🖕3
“Шахтеры”, блин… 👇
Выходцы из Сунтарского района Республики Саха отчитались о захвате шахты Южнодонбасская-3. Во время её захвата погиб как минимум 1 уроженец республики. Эта не действующая и разбитая шахта в данный момент является чуть ли не единственной шахтой, которая реально подконтрольна кому-то из саха. Практически все шахты самой республики в той или иной мере управляются московскими компаниями. 👉 Лига, на основании документов…
🤡5👍2👎2🖕1
Тюркомонголы с гордостью развешивают московитские труселя над руинами школ и детсадов Украины... 👇
👍4🤨1🤮1
Отряды из Бурятии, Республики Саха и Дальнего Востока развешивают свои флаги над руинами Угледара. Их дронщики показали, во что они превратили город, находящийся от них за 10 тысяч км. Населения в нем практически не осталось и теперь в городе, в который российские войска пришли "защищать русский язык", звучат преимущественно языки предствителей коренных народов Сибири и Дальнего Востока, а русского языка практически…
🤬11😢2👍1🤷♂1
⚡️А потом они удивляются, почему кругом русофобия. Ватное болото
💯28🤣6👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @neonomadPPL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 990,405 of 1,176,613entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@neonomadPPL named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NEONOMAD” (@neonomadPPL), 824 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neonomadPPL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.