Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ЗАКРЫТЫ Neonix Flood Info

@neonixflood

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

156subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002493920036
TypeChannel
Username@neonixflood
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/neonixflood

Growth

15610 Aug 2026, 00:46 — 156 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 02:31 — 156 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 00:4610 Aug 2026, 02:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 155–157 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:31156no change
10 Aug 2026, 00:46156first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52109683027964361511327.1%
custom 52110278267481888161225.0%
custom 5210804338124941944918.8%
custom 5287721391305547840612.5%
custom 5263008441542143797510.4%
custom 542471934183056751624.17%
custom 528525879879194234312.08%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @neonixflood. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 12 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 12:29 UTC68 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

настоящая причина закрытия неоникса

custom 52108043381249419441custom 52877213913055478401

Signed KittenXcx $5

13 Jun 2026, 19:28 UTC167 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

нет шлюха ни за что

custom 52108043381249419443custom 52109683027964361512custom 52877213913055478402custom 52110278267481888161

Signed Rehabe

13 Jun 2026, 18:48 UTC169 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

я уже скучаю за неониксами

Signed KittenXcx $5

7 Jun 2026, 06:36 UTC274 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

чат останется, как воспоминание

custom 52110278267481888166custom 52108043381249419442custom 52109683027964361511custom 52630084415421437971

Signed KittenXcx $5

7 Jun 2026, 06:35 UTC383 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔒The end? чистка прошла. банов больше чем 5. как обещал - мы закрываемся. жаль что наш флуд был очень долго , но закрылся из-за безразличия участников. норма всего лишь 150 соо. я не буду читать нотации , всего лишь поблагодарить многих за участие в жизни флуда, за активность , за моменты. надеюсь , ближе к июлю мы заново откроемся , так что не спешите удалять инфо. со всеми сз разрыв. люблю

custom 52109683027964361517custom 52110278267481888162custom 52877213913055478402custom 54247193418305675162custom 52108043381249419441custom 52630084415421437971

Signed KittenXcx $5

7 Jun 2026, 06:35 UTC220 viewsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed KittenXcx $5

5 Jun 2026, 14:40 UTC209 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @abubandits0Photo

@abubandits0 🌟 @neonixflood заключают братский союз, который в дальнейшем может стать ключом к успеху

Signed † ĶĬčĥĄ †

31 May 2026, 18:02 UTC226 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @zeendlyPhoto

⠀⠀⠀𝗇𝖾𝗐 𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗅𝗒 𝗎𝗇𝗂𑄜𝗇! @neonixflood & @zeendly будеm р𐐼ды сотруднuч𐐼ть!

Signed KittenXcx $5

31 May 2026, 09:26 UTC149 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

почти никто в чате не набрал норму в 150 соо. если на следующей неделе будет хотя бы 5 банов и у половины чата будут преды - закрываемся навсегда

Signed KittenXcx $5

31 May 2026, 09:25 UTC496 viewsread 10 August 2026

🐰🤍; результаты чистки баны & шухуа джиу (хатуха) кюджин ив сакура ниннин йеджи наен чонсу срочно ищем нью, писать @xandra79 #neonix_rp

Signed dgaf

28 May 2026, 19:37 UTC313 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

🎀ew video! made by - karina idea not our #neonix_video #neonix_rp

custom 52108043381249419441

Signed KittenXcx $5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @neonixflood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 596,629 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЗАКРЫТЫ Neonix Flood Info” (@neonixflood), 156 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neonixflood.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.