Channel
@neomoghicc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
202subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 5 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001744293890 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neomoghicc |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neomoghicc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 01:58 | 202 | -1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 02:22 | 203 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 23 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (23 September 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 844 |
| Reactions total | 62 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
62 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 32 | 51.6% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 40.3% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 8.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هر طور که فکر می‌کنم بنظرم عمیق‌ترین، جدی‌ترین و فلسفی‌ترین سریالی که به حال خلق شده بی‌بروبرگشت و با اختلاف شاهکاری به نام Leftovers هست اگر آب دستتونه بذارید زمین و ببینیدش محشره.
👍4❤1
Signed REYMOND REDDINGTON
اینم اضافه کنم که همیشه گفتم "مسئولیت‌پذیری" برای من مهم‌ترین رُکن و عنصر هست در هر جایگاهی گفتم که مهم‌ترین دلیل ناامیدی و عصبانیتم از پهلوی عدم مسئولیت‌پذیری نسبت به کشته‌شدگان دی‌ماه و بی‌عرضگی اون بود در سطح روابط هم همینه مسئولیت پذیری یعنی طرف نسبت به جایگاه و اولویتی که در زندگیت داره مسئولیت داره و نیاز نیست هی خودت رو یادآوری کنی طرف مقابل نسبت به حرف ها، رفتار ها، چیز هایی که دوست داری و چیز هایی که دوست …
👍4❤1
Signed REYMOND REDDINGTON
چند شبی هست که با قدیمی‌ترین و صمیمی‌ترین رفیقم دو ساعتی رو حضوری تو ماشین صحبت می‌کنیم فکر کنم سه سال شده که با دوست دخترش بقول امروزیا فابه و خب از کدورت هامون از دیگران می‌گیم و اینا و هر سری میگه تو احمق و ساده و مهربونی، رفاقت یک جاده و مسیر دوطرفه هست اگر با طرف خدای رفاقت هم هستی وقتی می‌بینی همش تو داری میذاری رفتاری اون رابطه ارزش ادامه دادن نداره، آدما پی منفعت خودشون هستن حالا اعم از این‌که در زندگیشون تغی…
👍3❤1
Signed REYMOND REDDINGTON
No Caption.
👍3❤1
Signed REYMOND REDDINGTON
یعنی چیشد که قطب تمدن بشریت از زمین و هوا و دریا منزوی شده؟ آفرین طاعون اسلام.
👍2💯2
Signed Diako
گر بیایی دَهَمت جان ور نیایی کُشدم غم / من که می‌میرم از این "غم" چه بیایی چه نیایی.
❤6
Signed REYMOND REDDINGTON
دشتمان گرگ اگر داشت ، نمی نالیدم نیمی از گله‌ی ما را سگ چوپان خورده ! جرم من ، فاشِ مگوهاست وَ حکمم سنگین چه کند شاهدِ سوگند به قرآن خورده ؟
💯3❤2
Signed REYMOND REDDINGTON
برای منِ نوعی روابطم دارای ارزش هست و بخش بزرگی از وجود من رو تشکیل میده برای من بخشی از تعریف شدن من آدم هایی هستن که باهاشون معاشرت می‌کنم آنچه که در فضای مجازی داره ترویج میشه و جا می‌افته و چه بسا افتاده برای من نه قابل دَرکه و نه قابل قبول که تا اتفاق کوچیکی افتاد فورا رابطه‌ات رو به پایان برسون من هم متوجه آدم های بیمار از هر نوعش هستم، من هم می‌فهمم که روابط بیمارگونه با هر جایگاهی که فرد داره در زندگیت نباید …
👍6❤1
Signed REYMOND REDDINGTON
شاید این قصه مرا بعد تو دیوانه کند که قرار است کسی موی تورا شانه کند. بانمکه، اینقدر که خواب تورو شاهدخت هر شب و هر شب، هر شب و هر روز می‌بینم؛ اطرافیانت از نزدیک تورو نمی‌بینن!
❤5
Signed REYMOND REDDINGTON
این مسئله که کسی که در زمینه‌ای دانشی نداره حق اظهار نظر در اون زمینه رو نداره صرفا محدود به قشر خاصی یا مثلا منتقدین نمیشه بل‌که مختص به هر انسانی در هر جایگاهی میشه به عنوان نمونه چیزی که اواخر مشاهده کردم خوانش های علمی و فلسفی! از ابیات مولانا بوده که به جد احمقانه و نادرسته مولانا یکی از شُعرای مورد علاقه‌ی خود من هست و در این‌که یکی از قله‌های شعر تاریخ هست شکی نیست اما اگر بنا بر خوانش های علمی و فلسفی باشه و…
👍3
Signed REYMOND REDDINGTON
برخی از معدود رفیق های دخترم که قائلن من زن‌ستیزم حالا یک کامنت رندوم از من در کامنت های یک کانال رندوم که خودم با اکانت دیگه خوام برای حمایت از خانوم ها استدلال میارم:
❤5
Signed REYMOND REDDINGTON
سخنان استاد سید مسعود حسینی، دکترای فلسفه، خطاب به زباله‌ای به‌نام اردبیلی و دیگر هم‌کیشان او در جایگاه سوپاپ اطمینان حاکمیت کنونی.
👍3❤1
Signed REYMOND REDDINGTON
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @neomoghicc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نئوموژیک” (@neomoghicc), 202 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neomoghicc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.