3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 616–618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 00:46
616
-2
7 Aug 2026, 15:50
618
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:33
618
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
56.2%
avg views ÷ 616 subscribers
Avg views / post
346
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
18 (16 June 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
2,078
Reactions total
40
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
89 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
59
66.3%
🔥
9
10.1%
👍
6
6.74%
❤🔥
5
5.62%
👏
4
4.49%
🤣
3
3.37%
⚡
1
1.12%
👌
1
1.12%
👎
1
1.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
رویداد Zero to One 🚀
در این رویداد فرصتی خواهیم داشت تا درباره تجربه های عملی مسیر توسعه کسب و کار و چالشهای کارآفرینی در حوزه سلامت گفتگو کنیم. اگر به نوآوری و ساخت کسب و کارهای اثرگذار در سلامت علاقه مند هستید، این رویداد برای شماست!
🔗 لینک ثبت نام در در رویداد
کارآفرینی و نوآوری 👈🏻 @neocolony
📡 رادار فرصت نئوکلونی
سه فرصت مرتبط با فناوری و کارآفرینی که مهلتش نزدیکه:
1️⃣ استارتاپویکند صنعت فرش دستباف
یک رویداد آنلاین برای ایدههای مرتبط با طراحی، بازاریابی، تجارت الکترونیک و فناوری در صنعت فرش.
• آخرین مهلت پیشثبتنام: ۱۲ مرداد
• زمان برگزاری: ۱۴ و ۱۵ مرداد
• هزینه ثبتنام: ۱۲۰ هزار تومان
• مناسب برای صاحبان ایده، دانشجویان، فعالان فناوری و کسبوکار
🔗 "اطلاعات و ثبتنام"
2️⃣ حضور در نمایشگاه فناوری…
هکاتون پل دوم در کارخانه هوشمصنوعی ایران
"دستیار هوشمند تحلیل و بهینهسازی پروموشنهای فروش"
«مسالهی واقعی از دل صنعت»
در هکاتون «پل دوم»، دادههای واقعی و ناشناسسازیشده فروش، قیمت، تخفیفها و کمپینهای گذشته یک صنعت در اختیار شرکتکنندگان قرار میگیرد تا با استفاده از هوشمصنوعی، راهکارهایی برای تحلیل اثر واقعی پروموشنها بر فروش و سودآوری و پیشنهاد سناریوهای مؤثرتر برای کمپینهای آینده توسعه دهند.
🏆 جایزه نق…
📌 دوست دارید چه محتوایی در کانال تلگرام نئوکلونی ببینید؟
اطلاع رسانی رویدادهای نئوکلونی و سایر رویدادهای کارآفرینی کشور73%
محتوای ویدیویی مرتبط با کسب و کار و اکوسیستم استارتاپی51%
فرصتهای شغلی43%
محتوای آموزشی و اینفوگرافیک22%
سایر (لطفا از طریق دایرکت، محتوای مورد نظرتون رو بگید)2%
The shares total 191%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
آینده رو دیتاست! 🧑🏻💻
بشنوید از آقای نادر رفتاری مالک برند رفتاری درباره آینده و دیتا و سخنان آقای مهدی فیروزان بنیانگذار شهر کتاب و فيديبو در رابطه با تراسیفای در رویداد اینوتکس پیچ.
🆔 @trusify
در اینوتکس پیچ امسال از بازدیدکنندههای نئوکلونی پرسیدیم که:
به نظر شما نئوکلونی چه ارزشی خلق کرده؟
پاسخها را با هم بشنویم 🚀
کارآفرینی و نوآوری 👈🏻 @neocolony
به نظر شما میشه توی ایران موفق شد؟
این سؤالی بود که از نیکان و آریا پرسیدیم؛
دو تا ذهن خلاق، پرانرژی و فوقالعاده امیدوار که نهفقط درباره آینده حرف میزنن، بلکه از همین حالا دارن میسازنش.
دیدن این حجم از انگیزه و جسارت در این سن، واقعا تحسینبرانگیزه، این ویدئو رو تا آخر ببینید؛
احتمالاً بعدش شما هم با خودتون میگید:
با حضور این نسل آینده روشن خواهد بود.
کارآفرینی و نوآوری 👈🏻 @neocolony
بشنوید از کسانی که سالها در اکوسیستم نوآوری و سرمایهگذاری حضور داشتند...
در این گفتوگو، آقای نادر رفتاری مالک برند رفتاری و آقای مهدی فیروزان بنیانگذار شهر کتاب و فیدیبو ، ارزیابی خودشون رو از کیفیت تیمها، روند رقابت و آنچه در اینوتکس پیچ امسال دیدند، با نئوکلونی به اشتراک گذاشتند.
کارآفرینی و نوآوری 👈🏻 @neocolony
حال و هوای اینوتکس پیچ امسال از دوربین نئوکلونی
دوستای خوبی که دیدیم، ایده های جالبی که شنیدیم و کسایی که کلی بهشون افتخار کردیم.
تشکر ویژه از #کوپا همراه خوب ما
کارآفرینی و نوآوری 👈🏻 @neocolony
هر کودکی حق دارد دیده شود، آموزش ببیند و آیندهای روشن داشته باشد.
🕊️ سازمان بین المللی Teachers Against Poverty از همه انسانهای متخصص، متعهد و دغدغهمندی که به حقوق کودکان باور دارند دعوت میکند در مسير تحقق عدالت آموزشی، داوطلبانه همراهمان شوند.
اگر در هر یک از این حوزه ها توانایی دارید جای شما در خانواده TAP خالیست:
📚 آموزش و تدريس
✍️ تولید محتوای آموزشی
🎥 تولید محتوای رسانه ای
🎨 تصویر سازی و هنر
🌐 ترجمه و بوم…
اینوتکس پیچ امسال هم با ارائه ی ۱۲ تیم بزرگسال و ۶ تیم زیر ۱۸ سال به پایان رسید 🫶🏼
درس ها و نکات جالبی برای تک تک ما داشت، به امید درخشش هرچه بیشتر این تیم ها در آینده
ممنون از همه ی عزیزانی که در برگزاری این رویداد، دست یاری رسوندند.
کارآفرینی و نوآوری 👈🏻 @neocolony
❤5🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @neocolony. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📌 دوست دارید چه محتوایی در کانال تلگرام نئوکلونی ببینید؟
اطلاع رسانی رویدادهای نئوکلونی و سایر رویدادهای کارآفرینی کشور73%
محتوای ویدیویی مرتبط با کسب و کار و اکوسیستم استارتاپی51%
فرصتهای شغلی43%
محتوای آموزشی و اینفوگرافیک22%
سایر (لطفا از طریق دایرکت، محتوای مورد نظرتون رو بگید)2%
The shares total 191%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 489,347 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NeoColony • نئوکلونی” (@neocolony), 616 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neocolony.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.