Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⟢ ˒𝒏𝘦𝓵𝓃ҽ𝐧ꫀ'𝗌 𝓅𐓟𝗋𝑎𝐝𝗂𝓈𝘦 ᰍ

Channel

⟢ ˒𝒏𝘦𝓵𝓃ҽ𝐧ꫀ'𝗌 𝓅𐓟𝗋𝑎𝐝𝗂𝓈𝘦 ᰍ

@nenescupid

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

24subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 16 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004428918155
TypeChannel
Username@nenescupid
Created14 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded16 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nenescupid

Growth

2416 Sept 2026, 22:47 — 24 subscribers16 Sept 2026, 23:22 — 24 subscribers16 Sept 2026, 22:4716 Sept 2026, 23:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–25 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 23:2224no change
16 Sept 2026, 22:4724first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 14 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
897.0%
avg views ÷ 24 subscribers
Avg views / post
215
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
27.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held12 (14 August 202624 August 2026)
Views total2,368
Reactions total64
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Sept 2026, 23:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

64 reactions across 3 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 49025804897783670491726.6%
custom 49022504816712113281218.8%
custom 49025268026871667691015.6%
custom 4902650094018365629914.1%
custom 4904544436588906404914.1%
custom 490270165510075369446.25%
custom 490261250016962417323.13%
custom 490271400742669715211.56%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC55 viewsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @Selfship_OcxCanon_ConfessionPhoto

.・🐦‍⬛🪦🐰 💚 🐰🪦🐦‍⬛.・ .・゜゜・✧・゚: *✧・゚:*.・゜゜・✧・ ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ✨✨ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🤍🎀🤍🪦🤍🎀🤍🪦🤍🎀🤍 ~Это место посвящено вашей любви к вашим любимым персонажам! Селфшипы, ос/каноны — мы рады всем. Тут вы можете выразить свою любовь к персонажам, показать своё творчество и найти общение ✧・゚: *✧・゚:*.・✧・゚: *✧・゚:*.・ ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ »»————> 💚~‧‌⁺˚*・Бот для тейков @Selfship_OcxCanon_bot・*˚⁺‧‌

24 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC49 viewsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @sshcmnlPhoto

ᅠ ⏝⏝ ۪ ﹝ sshcm.doesn’t like✅ ☕︎ ⤫ ⠘ ♡̶ ⁾ состоишь в сшкм и недоволен? хочется выплеснуть злость? устал терпеть кого-то или что-то? добро пожаловать в сшкм не любит ! ⩩ ⤸ 😠 🎀 𝆭 . ‌ֺ ۫ׄ 𝗐ֺ𝗋𝐢𝗍𝖾 ִᅟ𝖺 𝗍𝐚𝗄𝖾 . 𞥊𝆹𝅥𝂅ׄ ۪

23 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC59 views28 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Photo

🤩 : маленькие🤏🤏🤏🤏чибики нелнэнэ крошечные🤏совсем всех обнимаю кстати я не ожидала такого актива блин ну. 🥹 #арт 🐏🐏 🤩 🐏 🤩🤩🤩

custom 49026500940183656299custom 49022504816712113288custom 49025804897783670498custom 49026125001696241732custom 49027140074266971521

22 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC60 views35 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Photo

🤩 : наконец-то первопост!! арты, которые накопились за последнее время. cr1 @chur4elka #арт 🐏🐏 🤩 🐏 🤩🤩🤩

custom 490252680268716676910custom 49025804897783670499custom 49045444365889064049custom 49027016551007536944custom 49022504816712113283

20 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC113 views1 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Photo

🥹🥹 mutial piar & supp 🤩🤩🤩 abt me🥹🥹 🥹 нелнэнэ 🤩🍧💘🤩 🤩 ясиро нэнэ 🤩 тмхк🤩 🤩 войдшейр @nenescupid 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🥹🤩 вз пиар 🥹 🤩 0+🤩промежуток 10 минут🤩 🤩 мск время 🥹 держатся 1 день могу отказать не называя причину 🥹🥹 вз сапп 🤩🤩 анкета для саппа: название сш & эк & имя и фд ф/о & сшкн & шейрстатус могу отказать не называя причину 🥹 🥹 🥹@yashiroslady сапп-лист 🥹 🤩🤩

custom 49022504816712113281

20 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC≈1,540 viewsread 16 September 2026
Photo

wׄ𐐼‌𐓣ִׄna sׅℯe tჩe 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 ꫀ𝗍e𝓻ռִׄaׄℓ l৩𝝊ִׄe 𝘰f tw𑄝 𝒇lυ݁𝒻𝗳ℽ s𑄝uℓs ? 🤩 🤩этот канал всецело посвящен нашей с Нэнэ трепетной и нежной любви. ૮₍ ꒳ `₎. 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🥹🥹 🥹𝑵avigation 🤩

20 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC109 viewsread 16 September 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 ռ𐓟𝝊igaτ𝗂৩n🤩 🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🥹 🥹 mew&mp 🥹🥹 anon 🥹🥹 dm 🥹🤩 info 🥹 🥹 boost нелнэнэ - 🤩🍧💘🤩 - войдшейр

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @nenescupid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⟢ ˒𝒏𝘦𝓵𝓃ҽ𝐧ꫀ'𝗌 𝓅𐓟𝗋𝑎𝐝𝗂𝓈𝘦 ᰍ” (@nenescupid), 24 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nenescupid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.