Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Прогулки по священным рощам

Channel

Прогулки по священным рощам

@nemus_sacrum

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,581subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002210633826
TypeChannel
Username@nemus_sacrum
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nemus_sacrum

Growth

2,5812,5832,5826 August 2026 — 2,583 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,583 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,581 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,581–2,583 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:162,581-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:222,583no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:492,583first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.0%
avg views ÷ 2,581 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,340
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held19 (26 February 202630 July 2026)
Views total5,369
Reactions total131
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

751 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍25033.3%
19325.7%
🔥13518.0%
😁425.59%
🙏283.73%
🤔263.46%
🫡162.13%
❤‍🔥141.86%
131.73%
🥰101.33%
👏81.07%
😱70.932%
👎20.266%
😢20.266%
🤓20.266%
🤯20.266%
🥴10.133%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 751reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC549 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

История о том, как из множественности Дионисиев проистекли беды для Абеляра Само повествование мы находим в "Истории моих бедствий": "Однажды во время чтения мне случайно попалась одна сентенция Беды из толкования «Деяний апостолов», в которой он заявляет, что Дионисий Ареопагит был, скорее, коринфским, а не афинским епископом. Это показалось весьма противным тем, кто хвастался, что их Дионисий – тот самый Ареопагит

👍12🔥2😁1

28 Jul 2026, 06:32 UTC≈2,020 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Коллега тут рассуждает, как протесты в Индии повлияют на будущие политические расклады. Вопрос на самом деле интересный и не такой простой, как может показаться. Ни позицию БДП, ни внутреннее единство партии протесты никак не поколебали. Отставка Прадхана произошла не из-за того, в чем его в течение долгого времени обвиняли (исправление учебников истории, курс на трехъязычие в школе) - он просто стал козлом отпущени

👍20🔥7😁41👎1

27 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC≈1,740 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Один из самых интересных артефактов в Ахенском соборе - т.н. амвон Генриха II, созданный между 1002 и 1014 гг. и представляющий из себя, как считается, памятник Оттоновского возрождения. Не в последнюю очередь его рассматривают именно через эту призму благодаря шести рельефам из слоновой кости коптской работы, на которых изображены вполне языческие сюжеты (Исида, Вакх, нимфы, нереиды, менады, гении и проч.) Насладить

18👍6🔥3

26 Jul 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,060 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Есть что сказать в свою защиту, филологи?

😁33🔥172🤯2😢2

7 Jul 2026, 03:39 UTC≈1,760 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Имя "Хайдер Али" (писалось обычно Hyder Ally), к слову сказать, оставалось в американском флоте довольно популярным уже и после того, как сам Хайдер Али приказал долго жить. Из носивших его кораблей самым удачливым оказался восемнадцатипушечный приватир, вынудивший после боя в заливе Делавер-бэй 8 апреля 1782 г. капитулировать британский шлюп "Генерал Монк" (бывший американский "Генерал Вашингтон", захваченный британ

🔥19👍5

1 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC≈1,900 views94 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Канал давно не обновлялся, но по уважительным причинам

👍5023🫡16❤‍🔥3🤓2

15 Apr 2026, 08:54 UTC≈2,920 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ульфилица, которую мы они потеряли

👍27😱7🔥32

12 Apr 2026, 05:52 UTC≈2,910 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Где твое, смерте, жало; где твоя, аде, победа; воскресе Христос, и ты низверглся еси. Воскресе Христос, и падоша демони. Воскресе Христос, и радуются ангели. Воскресе Христос, и жизнь жительствует. Воскресе Христос, и мертвый ни един во гробе: Христос бо востав от мертвых, начаток усопших бысть. Тому слава и держава, во веки веков, аминь

🙏2824🥰10👎1🥴1

5 Apr 2026, 14:39 UTC≈26,800 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

По случаю Вербного воскресенья (с которым поздравляю всех подписчиков) в ленте много замечательного стихотворения Тимура Кибирова, которое я тоже очень люблю. Но подумалось тут, что двух из перечисленных христианство удачно, как это модно сейчас говорить, апроприировало. И если насчет последнего все очевидно, спасибо Иустину Философу, александрийцам и многим другим, то история со вторым менее известна, хотя не менее

🔥2611

3 Apr 2026, 19:33 UTC≈2,810 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хороший пример апелляции к псевдоантичности, призванной придать придуманной автором параллели глубину и значимость. Никакого "противостояния" между теллурократиями и талассократиями древние греки не выводили, и тем более никак не противопоставляли Элладу как морскую державу якобы континентальной Персии. Само слово "теллурократия" - изобретение новейшего времени (непосредственно тов. Дугина, опиравшегося на Карла Шмит

👍38🔥119🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nemus_sacrum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 367,046 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Прогулки по священным рощам” (@nemus_sacrum), 2,581 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nemus_sacrum.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.