Channel
@neirobots
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002548848838 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neirobots |
| Created | 2 May 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neirobots |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 12 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:10 | 12 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 2 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2025 to 5 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
n8n против Zapier и Make: в чём разница? Частый вопрос от клиентов: «А чем n8n лучше других автоматизаторов?». Рассказываю честно, по делу: 🔹 n8n — open-source и хостится у вас. Вы контролируете данные. Это важно, если у вас чувствительная инфа (например, финансы, медицина, клиентские базы). 🔹 n8n гибче. Там, где Zapier «упирается» в шаблон, n8n позволяет тонкую настройку. Можно подключать API, ветвить логику, стр…
❤2
Чек-лист: готов ли ваш бизнес к автоматизации? Если вы находите у себя хотя бы 2-3 пункта из списка ниже — автоматизация даст ощутимый результат уже в первый месяц. 🔸 Вы или ваша команда тратите больше 30 минут в день на одинаковые действия 🔸 Заявки, оплаты или задачи иногда «теряются» 🔸 У вас есть таблицы или формы, которые вручную кто-то заполняет или проверяет 🔸 Нужно регулярно уведомлять клиентов или сотруднико…
Кейс: как мы спасли 6 часов в неделю для менеджера Клиент — небольшое маркетинговое агентство. У менеджера каждый день одно и то же: — проверка новых заявок с формы на сайте, — копипаст в Google Sheets, — уведомление в Telegram команде, — и письмо клиенту, что заявка получена. Ничего сложного, но на это уходило 40-50 минут в день. ⠀ Я подключил n8n, настроил автомат: — заявка сразу падает в таблицу, — бот пишет в T…
5 рутинных задач, которые легко автоматизировать с помощью n8n Каждый день бизнес сталкивается с одинаковыми задачами. Они вроде несложные, но крадут время и внимание. Вот пять типичных процессов, которые легко отдать на автомат: Уведомления о новых заявках Заявка пришла с сайта — n8n тут же шлёт тебе Telegram, письмо или создаёт задачу в Trello. Ни одна не потеряется. Добавление клиентов в CRM Больше никаких копи…
Что такое n8n и зачем он нужен бизнесу В каждом бизнесе есть задачи, которые повторяются снова и снова. Отправить письмо, перенести заявку в CRM, напомнить о встрече, собрать отчёт… Все они вроде бы несложные, но съедают часы времени. n8n — это инструмент, который берёт эти рутинные процессы на себя. Он как виртуальный сотрудник, который не устает и не ошибается. В отличие от популярных no-code сервисов, n8n — гибк…
Разработал бот визитку с возможностью прохождения опросов
Voice message, posted without a caption
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @neirobots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 568,450 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кудряшов Иван | Нейроботы” (@neirobots), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neirobots.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.