Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

КвасЯ(люблю)

@nehvas

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

131subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001919994919
TypeChannel
Username@nehvas
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nehvas

Growth

128131129.56 August 2026 — 128 subscribers9 August 2026 — 128 subscribers12 August 2026 — 131 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 128–131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:44131+3
9 Aug 2026, 01:46128no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:22128first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.0%
avg views ÷ 131 subscribers
Avg views / post
72.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
26.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held16 (31 December 202530 July 2026)
Views total72
Reactions total19
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

385 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋16542.9%
custom 53345289756895173926617.1%
custom 53371280193141205145514.3%
🙏4712.2%
custom 5336900334507824250348.83%
custom 5336955168355290603184.68%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 385reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nehvas. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 December 2025 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC72 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вы думали я не совмещу два своих гиперфикса? Плохо обо мне думали

custom 533452897568951739212custom 53369003345078242507

24 Jun 2026, 20:01 UTC146 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сделала тикиток по тренду мда

💋18custom 53369003345078242508

2 Jun 2026, 22:07 UTC177 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Стала слишком силли и слепила оску по реверсу

custom 533452897568951739215custom 53369551683552906036custom 53371280193141205141

26 May 2026, 21:44 UTC196 views27 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кто обитает на дне океана

💋15custom 53371280193141205147custom 53345289756895173925

1 May 2026, 16:48 UTC206 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

когда я разрешу себе немного отдохнуть, я никому не скажу, но знаки будут

🙏14💋2custom 53345289756895173922

30 Apr 2026, 20:56 UTC204 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

tw: голый мен (без писек) я убеждена, что его в душ каждый раз как на казнь вели

💋15custom 53345289756895173922custom 53369003345078242502

3 Apr 2026, 21:43 UTC206 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Поговаривают, на мне лежит проклятие: если в моей работе нет заваленного горизонта - меня съедают крокодилы

custom 533452897568951739216custom 53369551683552906036💋4🙏1custom 53369003345078242501

31 Mar 2026, 13:14 UTC212 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Пока впны не запретят, тг я буду вести, но если что вот карточка со всеми соцсетями, где я публикуюсь (из них только вк мертвый, но мб и его воскрешу 🌟) А картинка из мини-зина по дм и инференсу!

💋19custom 53371280193141205143

27 Mar 2026, 17:03 UTC213 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

at least this exhausting suffering won't last forever

custom 533712801931412051415custom 53345289756895173926💋2

8 Mar 2026, 18:52 UTC605 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А у меня сегодня🦈🦈🥳 Я не оч много рисую в последнее время, но я очень рада, что собрала вокруг себя столько классных и талантливых людей. Спасибо вам за это!! Надеюсь, еще сумею порадовать вас прикольными картинками в этом году, всех чмок в пупок 😺 Ну и по традиции, картинки, которыми я больше всего горжусь за прошедший год 🌟

💋17🙏7custom 53371280193141205146custom 53345289756895173922

28 Feb 2026, 18:44 UTC203 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Для всех, кто переживал, но боялся об этом сказать: не волнуйтесь, день рождения пупсика я не только маркером в календаре отметила

💋22

27 Feb 2026, 21:04 UTC178 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

By the time the sun had come and gone a thousand times over, the blessing had turned into a curse. And finally, on the three thousandth day, it transfused into my very existence

💋25

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @nehvas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 392,105 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КвасЯ(люблю)” (@nehvas), 131 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nehvas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.