Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Город в негативах

Channel

Город в негативах

@negative_cities

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

213subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002389269672
TypeChannel
Username@negative_cities
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/negative_cities

Growth

2132152148 August 2026 — 214 subscribers8 August 2026 — 214 subscribers14 August 2026 — 215 subscribers30 August 2026 — 214 subscribers16 September 2026 — 213 subscribers8 August 202616 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 39 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 213–215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 05:16213-1
30 Aug 2026, 05:54214-1
14 Aug 2026, 17:45215+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:49214no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:04214first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

170 reactions across 6 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5331.2%
💔4928.8%
🔥2212.9%
❤‍🔥137.65%
custom 585511575540990372384.71%
😢84.71%
🥰84.71%
custom 585254647590866539542.35%
custom 585017608775296977021.18%
🙏21.18%
custom 585494446781917122610.588%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 6 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @negative_cities. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 May 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 19:23 UTC92 views27 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНАЯ ПРОБЛЕМА ОТЕЧЕСТВЕННОГО ГРАДОСТРОИТЕЛЬСТВА ПРОШЛОГО, НАСТОЯЩЕГО И БУДУЩЕГО* * если мы ее не решим, конечно Изначально это должен был быть финальный пост о Высоковском. Но в итоге получился разговор о настоящем и немного о будущем. Итак, Высоковский придумал НРМ, сделал десятки ПЗЗ и на поздней стадии своего творчества вышел на трансцендентные рассуждения о том, что такое город. Почему мы ничего про

🔥15custom 585511575540990372353custom 58501760877529697702custom 58525464759086653951custom 58549444678191712261

8 Jul 2026, 21:32 UTC202 views4 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

А БЫЛА ЛИ ТОЧКА ПЕРЕЛОМА? Фото из города Кемь оказалось здесь совершенно случайно (или нет) Мое глубокое убеждение состоит в том, что содержательно Пермь на самом деле не была инновационна примерно ни в чем — все, что было сделано во время разработки этих Правил, Высоковский делал в отдельных проектах еще в 1990-1992 годах. Попытка перевода НРМ в социальное измерение через поведенческие ареалы, системы городских ка

❤‍🔥4

4 Jul 2026, 06:52 UTC466 views58 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

ПАМЯТИ ВИТАЛИЯ СТАДНИКОВА Вчера ушел из жизни Виталий Стадников. Я еще до этого в канале памятные посты не писал, но этот случай особый: этот человек – локальная легенда, и его уход – невосполнимая потеря. Большой (огромной!) величины градозащитник, классный архитектор, вайбовейший преподаватель и просто замечательный мужик. Когда общаюсь с бакалаврами, периодически упоминаю Стадникова, и всегда получаю в ответ реп

💔49😢81

29 Jun 2026, 19:42 UTC373 views45 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Наверное очень давно (или никогда вообще) не был еще так занят - за месяц успел защитить кандидатскую диссертацию, потерять и найти (и опять потерять) ответ на вопрос "что такое городская связность", собрать, наверное, максимальное количество таблиц в своей жизни, написать про субстанциональность городской среды Великого Новгорода и набросать простенькую заметку по городскому праву в Ведомости.Город Поэтому ровно на

25❤‍🔥9🥰8custom 58551157554099037233

28 May 2026, 22:16 UTC445 views24 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
File

По горячим следам закреплю "расследовательские доски" из своего доклада на Вечере Высоковского сегодня для интересующихся

15🔥4custom 58525464759086653953🙏2

26 May 2026, 20:23 UTC412 views12 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

ТОЧКА ПЕРЕЛОМА: АТИПИЧНЫЙ ПРОЕКТ ДЛЯ АТИПИЧНОГО ГОРОДА Пермский проект был слабо похож на все Правила, что Высоковский делал раньше. Да, тут в основу тоже лежала НРМ, однако вокруг и около нее было выстроено множество элементов, которых в более ранних проектов Правил не было. Начнем с того, что в обоснование проектных решений Правил была положена «Концепция пространственного развития г. Перми», и этот документ был

9🔥3

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @negative_cities. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Город в негативах” (@negative_cities), 213 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/negative_cities.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.