Channel
@nedopunkohuel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
415subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002411771748 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nedopunkohuel |
| Description | Фурри и брони художник 20 лет Студент-мультипликатор Периодически пропадает во время сессии Не женат |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nedopunkohuel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 415 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 415 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 417 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (11 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,839 |
| Reactions total | 43 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
70 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 33 | 47.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 25 | 35.7% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 10.0% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 5.71% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nedopunkohuel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Нарисовать юч с футфетишем: норм или стрём?
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Осталось 3 слота
🥰2
Пушистая Обитель Недопанка pinned a photo
Всё-таки открою 5 слотов на традишку (очень уж нужен отрез чёрного искусственного меха))) В этот раз хочу порисовать с фоном, он входит в стоимость (но если вам он не нужен, то не буду его делать) Хед - 400р Халф - 700р Фулл - 1000р +1 перс +75% Антро, пони, фералы Дедлайн - неделя в порядке очереди (то есть, если вы вторые в очереди - то 2 недели и тд). Очередь: 1 - @georgijturist 2 - @georgijturist 3 - 4 - 5 -
🔥6
На дидж брать заказы я пока не готов, но могу открыть слоты на традишку. Вы хотите этого?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Запустил розыгрыш бесплатного арта в традишке в привате) Напоминаю, что пожизненный доступ в платный канал (где весь NSFW без цензуры, поэтапки и работы в раннем доступе) стоит 150р
❤2
Ребята, спасибо, что так тепло встретили меня лайками❤️❤️❤️ Очень рад видеть, что вы ждали меня, а значит, моё творчество вам небезразлично) Впереди вас ждут как минимум 6 работ, которых вы уж точно не ожидали увидеть именно в моём исполнении. Но я параллельно разбираюсь с долгами по учёбе, пишу музыку, работаю... не сдохнуть бы😂
❤🔥8❤2💘1🔥1
Ещё традишки вам в ленту) Скоро уже будет дидж, не переживайте и не бейте меня😂
❤12❤🔥7🥰2
Потихоньку возвращаюсь к любимой (без шуток) деятельности) Пришлось немного попотеть, чтобы вспомнить, как вообще рисовать животных))). А теперь про сам рисунок: ребята, как бы плохо вам ни было, не делайте глупостей. Подумайте о своих перспективах, о близких, каково будет всё это потерять. И... не бойтесь обращаться к специалистам
❤8❤🔥2
Я в щитпосте выложил свою исповедь... кому интересно, можете почитать
❤🔥8❤1
Что лучше?
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤1
Я хочу наконец рассказать о своём отце публично (спойлер, там ничего хорошего). Для тех, кто скажет: "Вась, но ты же сам не приемлишь критику своего творчества, чем ты тогда будешь лучше?", поясню: мои рисунки, какими бы плохими они ни были, никому не вредят. Абсолютно. А вот моральное и сексуальное насилие, особенно в отношении ребёнка - ещё как. Поэтому, тут есть разница. Ну не суть. Вопрос в чём: вы хотели бы проч…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @nedopunkohuel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Нарисовать юч с футфетишем: норм или стрём?
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
На дидж брать заказы я пока не готов, но могу открыть слоты на традишку. Вы хотите этого?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что лучше?
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пушистая Обитель Недопанка” (@nedopunkohuel), 415 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nedopunkohuel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.