#music #thanksgivinglettertoGod @yummyattitudes @walladdisfams
Signed Yamlak

Channel
@nectarcreative
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
41subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001446517413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nectarcreative |
| Description | Hive for contemporary Ethiopian/world music, photography, film making,fashion/digital Art. #MusicArrangement #OriginalFilmScore #AndroidAppDevelopment #EventPhotoShoot #AnimationandGraphicsDesign @jamyattitude 👍 👍 - BEEMAKERS - |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 16 December 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nectarcreative |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 41 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 41 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 16 December 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
#music #thanksgivinglettertoGod @yummyattitudes @walladdisfams
Signed Yamlak
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Yamlak
Happy Easter.....
Signed Yamlak
#themindofanalcholic @nectarcreative
Signed Yamlak
#oblivious #wordoftheday @yummyattitudes
Signed Yamlak
#morna #thebarefootdiva #tango #travelingwidmusic #capeverde @nectarcreative @walladdisfams
Signed Yamlak
Cesária Évora (August 1941 – 17 December 2011) commonly known as Cize, was a Cape Verdean singer-songwriter She received a Grammy Award in 2004 for her album Voz d'Amor. Nicknamed the "Barefoot Diva" for performing without shoes was the "Queen of Morna" Morna is widely considered the national music of Cape Verde as is the fado for Portugal, the tango for Argentina, the merengue for Dominican Republic, the rumba fo…
Signed Yamlak
#yummyattitudes @yummyattitudes
Signed Yamlak
#goodmusic @nectarcreative🐝
Signed Yamlak
#FrancisFalceto, a french music producer and curator who has an affair of love with ethiopian music of the late 1950's up to 1980's. He produced the thirty volumes of the #Éthiopiques music series in collabration with #Amaha and #Kaifa records, who where the leading ethiopian music publishers during that time. Now #Éthiopiques music collection is like a goldmine for todays musicians as many producers use it to sample…
Signed Yamlak
According to signalling theory, a male peacock will display his vibrant fan of covert feathers in a ritual to attract a female with whom to mate. Such rituals vary from species to species, but in humans, our ability to create and wear clothes gives us a equivalent advantage in being able to distinguish ourselves from a crowd and demonstrate our individuality in an effort to find a mate. Conversely, too, we might use …
Signed Yamlak
#Chinese illustrator #Shanghai Tango AKA #Tango Gao, creates clever and thought-provoking comics that do not fail to portray their meaning and leave you with some realization😎☺... ️ #comics #illustrations @nectarcreative🐝
Signed Yamlak
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @nectarcreative. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 717,649 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@nectarcreative named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nectar/creative🐝🐝” (@nectarcreative), 41 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nectarcreative.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.