Posted without readable text
❤2

Channel
@ne_znayu_zachem_eto_vam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
238subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001591988155 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ne_znayu_zachem_eto_vam |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ne_znayu_zachem_eto_vam |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 238 | +1 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 237 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 240 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 241 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 241 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
112 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 60 | 53.6% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 18.8% | |
| 🤝 | 9 | 8.04% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 4.46% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 4.46% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 4.46% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.68% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.68% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.893% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤2
принесла вам холодка
😁5❤3
Я редко прямо ЖДУ какие-то музыкальные релизы, но тут я обновляла Spotify каждый день, чтобы увидеть ну когда же он появится 🙏 И когда он вышел я реально легла в темноте в наушниках и прослушала его весь от начала и до конца. И это был микстейп «9 months & 50 hours» от Fred again.. и LATIN MAFIA 🤩 Началось всё с записей концертов Фреда, где они включали ещё не выпущенные треки. 30 июля они в режиме живой трансляции…
🔥3
этот лютый asmr отрубил мне домашний интернет и мобильную связь в ноль пишу вот из клочка цивилизации в общем, если не можете до меня дописаться и дозвониться — значит я дома без связи и вам остаётся только ехать ко мне в гости
❤6😱1
произошел какой-то лютый asmr
❤14😍5💔2
я, да
😁16🤝9💯3
Итак, у большинства какой-то порядок в воспоминаниях всё таки есть 🤓 У 55% проголосовавших они привязаны к каким-то столпам, а у 31% счастливчиков даже привязаны к датам или возрасту. А 38% мои — потеряшки 👫 Лично мои воспоминания напоминают кучу перемешанных фотографий. Те, что вспоминаются чаще лежат сверху и их я помню лучше. Некоторые — закопаны так глубоко, что я не могу вспомнить о них даже когда мне о них р…
❤13
Воспоминания в вашей голове упорядочены по хронологии? 👤
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
мэр Нью-йорка заменил строительные ограждения и галереи на более дизайнерские и более безопасные с нашим синим профнастилом конечно не сравнится 🫥
❤9
Кстати ещё про досмотры и "кивки". Досмотрела «Медведь». Сериал не для всех, признаю. Мне очень понравилась теория, что каждый сезон — это стадия принятия горя. Их, напомню, пять: 1. Шок (отрицание) 2. Гнев (чувство вины) 3. Торг 4. Депрессия 5. Принятие За депрессией наблюдать не так интересно, так что хейтеров 4го сезона, которые после этого бросили сериал и не вернулись, можно понять. Многим не понравился фина…
💔3
Посмотрела нашумевший «Backrooms» (aka «Закулисье реальности»). Знаю, что фильм основан на крипипастах о лиминальных пространствах, но для фильма им всё таки надо было придать этому всему суть и смысл. И я убеждена, что вот эту суть они украли из книги «Пиранези» Сюзанны Кларк (возможно то, что Кларк — это имя одно из героев это даже какой-то кивок) и на её месте я бы даже задумалась об иске. Только в книге это с…
❤1
если бы у меня была доска на Пинтерест с планированием свадебных нарядов моей мечты, то это улетело бы туда в первую очередь но такой доски у меня нет, так что оставлю это здесь ну и ещё это просто красиво 🫦
❤12❤🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ne_znayu_zachem_eto_vam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Воспоминания в вашей голове упорядочены по хронологии? 👤
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“канал о котором никто не просил” (@ne_znayu_zachem_eto_vam), 238 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ne_znayu_zachem_eto_vam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.