Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for невротик

Channel

невротик

@ne_v_rotic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

262subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002499199217
TypeChannel
Username@ne_v_rotic
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ne_v_rotic

Growth

262263262.57 August 2026 — 263 subscribers8 August 2026 — 263 subscribers14 August 2026 — 262 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 262–263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:59262-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:05263no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:31263first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.6%
avg views ÷ 262 subscribers
Avg views / post
82.8
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held15 (3 August 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,242
Reactions total197
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

197 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53101151188586662868643.7%
custom 53526913873619503304723.9%
custom 54225247252114500443718.8%
custom 52224595178616438522713.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ne_v_rotic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC62 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

пж отключите нам интернет

custom 53101151188586662869

5 Aug 2026, 03:06 UTC75 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

я вообще считаю, что boys planet уже давно не шоу для продвижения айдолов, а конвейер по выпуску бл актеров. иначе как объяснить, что куча трейни после этого подались именно в этот жанр киноиндустрии?

custom 53526913873619503308

5 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC74 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

когда тебе впервые в жизни понравился боттом из бл, а он взял и закрыл все гештальты разом: - трейни boys planet - танцор, репер, каверил миллион любимых кпоп треков - его имя minlee, что буквально звучит как шип. ДА ОН И ПОХОЖ НА СЫНА МИНХО И ФЕЛИКСА СЕЙМ

custom 531011511885866628610custom 54225247252114500444custom 53526913873619503303

4 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC80 views14 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

молитесь, усердно молитесь чтобы я не забросила этот текст

custom 52224595178616438528custom 53101151188586662863custom 54225247252114500443

4 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC82 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

думаю.... очень усердно думаю...

custom 542252472521145004413custom 531011511885866628611custom 52224595178616438526

4 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC83 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

в последнее время я залпом глотаю бл сериалы и вот моё личное мнение: предложение прокурора еще никто не переплюнул хотя, стоит отдать должное 8 серии пэйбека, однако сам по себе лакорн я бы оценила на троечку

custom 54225247252114500449custom 53101151188586662865

3 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC89 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

игра продолжается 5 отличий

custom 535269138736195033011

3 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC85 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

кстати, кто-то знает что-то про публикацию и вообще принцип работы ао3? думаю вот насчет расширения своих возможностей

custom 54225247252114500448

3 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC90 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

я очень прошу выйти со мной на связь и помочь разгонать кое-что по сынбинам

custom 522245951786164385213custom 53101151188586662867

3 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC92 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

я не могу он такой дурик😭🥺

custom 535269138736195033012custom 53101151188586662865

3 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC94 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/n9yMo5TWm0g ААААААА😭😑🤦‍♀️

custom 53101151188586662865

3 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC83 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

?

  1. 🍑💪 + 📷 👓69%
  2. 💂 + 🧑‍💼56%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ne_v_rotic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTCFinal Results16 voters

?

  1. 🍑💪 + 📷 👓69%
  2. 💂 + 🧑‍💼56%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 191,551 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“невротик” (@ne_v_rotic), 262 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ne_v_rotic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.