Channel
@ne_ssat_a_pisat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
274subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002608598527 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ne_ssat_a_pisat |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ne_ssat_a_pisat |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 274 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 277 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 278 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 277 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 277 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
708 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5415971434046456177 | 203 | 28.7% | |
| custom 5438254802414894357 | 128 | 18.1% | |
| 🐳 | 87 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5417902232299405087 | 74 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5415965957963155953 | 54 | 7.63% | |
| custom 5417860772980097564 | 52 | 7.34% | |
| custom 5415627639094281304 | 47 | 6.64% | |
| custom 5438541512956742167 | 36 | 5.08% | |
| custom 5418071011629238117 | 27 | 3.81% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 708 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 10 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ne_ssat_a_pisat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 November 2025 to 10 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Клянусь, ещё одна новость про замедления TG от неревантного паблика — начну только ссать, но не писать. Причём целенаправленно в авторов 🤩 Если хотите поднять актинвость на раз-два, готовьте ссылку на канал в MAX. Чур не удалять какашки и клоунов из реакций 🕯️
🐳19
Где вы на карте? Чуваки из TG pages сделали интересную развлекуху: карта, на которой размещено огромное количество каналов по тематике Свой можно найти по поиску А еще можно найти схожие каналы по сегментам. Полезная фича для комментинга + покупки рекламы 💪 Одна беда — каналы они сегментируют ну очень странно и обновляют данные не в real time 😠 Например, мой Руковожоп, где 99% постов про менеджмент, IT и руково…
🐳16
Не ссать, а писать — бесплатный гайд о том, как вести Telegram в 2026 году и не быть зассыхой с плохим ERR ☠️ Вот так, с ноги, я влетаю в этот покинутый богом канал, который уже и ребрендинг пережил! Почему я пропала надолго? Потому что не хотела писать хуйню. Но, начитавшись чужой, поняла, что ниша всё-таки пустует — и нечего воротить носиком! И да, 1000 подписчиков я тут не набрала Зато сделала для вас большой г…
🐳52
Channel photo updated
Кринжатина года от авторов каналов Версия автора канала, который хуй поклал на этот канал, но обещал исправиться в январе 😦 У меня вчера случился культурный шок, да такой силы, что я переборола стеснение и всё же решила высунуть нос из-за угла ОКАЗЫВАЕТСЯ многие авторы каналов следят поименно за теми, кто от них отписался и блокируют этих предателей, чтобы не дай Бог человек в момент просветления не вернулся 🤓🤓🤓
custom 541790223229940508725custom 543825480241489435720custom 54159659579631559535
Нашла для вас самые приятные итоги года 🤓 Т-банк — Главная — Кешбек и бонусы
custom 54180710116292381179
Приходите поболтать про TG ZOOM: пуньк ссылка Идентификатор конференции: 739 389 8867 Код доступа: aUjzJ2 Начинаем в 20:00, я буду болтать с 20:30 примерно Запись будет, но вайбик профукается 🤣
custom 54179022322994050878custom 54156276390942813046custom 54159714340464561775custom 54385415129567421673
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 541807101162923811712custom 54159659579631559539custom 54159714340464561777
Как же быстро я теряю уважение к авторам, которые посты в GPT хуячат Эээээх, словами не передать Это не про разочарование, это про утрату доверия 😹 Вы как там?
custom 543825480241489435720custom 541596595796315595310custom 54385415129567421676custom 54156276390942813042custom 54159714340464561772
P.S. умные посты вы не любите, так что, 👍, давайте ваши чёртовы итоги в Яндекс.Музыке обсудим 😹 Кидайте, если не ссыте!
custom 54159659579631559539custom 54179022322994050875custom 54156276390942813043custom 54178607729800975642
Используй GPT только в этих случаях Экспертный канал — это не место, где можно писать посты в GPT. Если, конечно, хочется коммьюнити, движ, а не постный канал с тремя лайками 😹 И всё же, без него никак. Чтобы зад и дальше не рвался на две половинки, решила чётко написать, когда ИИ стоит подключать 🔽 💪Чтобы быстро зафиксировать мысль, пока ещё тёплая Гуляете с собакой — мысль сформировалась. Наговорили голосуху в…
custom 541597143404645617725custom 541596595796315595315custom 541786077298009756413custom 541790223229940508713custom 54156276390942813046
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 54159659579631559536custom 54382548024148943575
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ne_ssat_a_pisat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Не ссать, а писать” (@ne_ssat_a_pisat), 274 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ne_ssat_a_pisat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.