Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒎𝒆 𓏺 ࠝ

Channel

𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒎𝒆 𓏺 ࠝ

@ne16e

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

285subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004470966563
TypeChannel
Username@ne16e
Created25 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ne16e

Growth

276285280.51 Sept 2026, 12:16 — 276 subscribers1 Sept 2026, 22:07 — 285 subscribers1 Sept 2026, 12:161 Sept 2026, 22:07
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 275–286 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 22:07285+9
1 Sept 2026, 12:16276first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 285 subscribers
Avg views / post
48.1
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held14 (25 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total625
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 12:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 13 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ne16e. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 12:05 UTC3 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @lawooyya

جيبوا لطيفين يسردو معنا وجهولي وبوجه من الاحصائيات 🦋🦋

Signed ࠝ𓏺 𝙽𝙾𝚄𝚁

1 Sept 2026, 12:04 UTC5 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @ooodrt

روليت شرط توجه لقناتك او 4 اشخاص روليت سراب > جميع السحوبات

Signed ࠝ𓏺 𝙽𝙾𝚄𝚁

1 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC3 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @lo8a18

تجيبولي كم حدا نصير ⁶⁰⁰ 🥹🌝

Signed ࠝ𓏺 𝙽𝙾𝚄𝚁

1 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTC8 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @LAL_Lord77

• مرحبا بكم 𓏺 روليت سريع 👑 👥 المشاركين: 10/20 • روليت تناهيد > جميع البوتات

Signed ࠝ𓏺 𝙽𝙾𝚄𝚁

1 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTC10 viewsread 1 September 2026
File

⌯︙ تم التحميل بنجاح 𝟼𝟼𝟼 🕸️

Signed Music sos - بوت ميوزك

1 Sept 2026, 11:51 UTC12 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @oaacae

سحب لطيف روليت سراب > جميع السحوبات

Signed ࠝ𓏺 𝙽𝙾𝚄𝚁

1 Sept 2026, 11:26 UTC17 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @viola200921

جيبولي كم بنوتة اردلهاا اشتراك بالمراسلة 💜

Signed ࠝ𓏺 𝙽𝙾𝚄𝚁

1 Sept 2026, 11:25 UTC14 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @rasa206

جيبولي شموسة تنشر نورها بالقناة🌞

Signed ࠝ𓏺 𝙽𝙾𝚄𝚁

1 Sept 2026, 11:16 UTC12 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @ROZA7238

تقييم قنوات 👑 رح يضل وقت طويل شوي مو اقل من تلت ساعات 🌟 بدي عدد كبير من القنوات 🧚 و التقييم رح يضل يومين 🌟🌟 وجهو هي الرسالة 🧸 و يلي عندو قناة يبعتها عالبوت و بس تحذفو التوجيه ابعتو قنواتكن هون مشان ما انسى اي قناة 💋🧍💋💋 @Roro7238_bot

Signed ࠝ𓏺 𝙽𝙾𝚄𝚁

1 Sept 2026, 11:12 UTC25 viewsread 1 September 2026

قال بحولو لشباب عاادي بس يحولو صور بنات حرام 🤣🤣🦦.

Signed ࠝ𓏺 𝙽𝙾𝚄𝚁

31 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC101 views0 reactions5 Starsread 1 September 2026
Photo

- إمِراةً صَعبةّ ، ڪأني ڪل القَوة ♥️. ࠝ𓏺 𝙽𝙾𝚄𝚁

30 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC139 views0 reactions5 Starsread 1 September 2026
Photo

- قوية مغرورة نڪدية فاتنة متمردة و هـذا ما يجعلني لا أخضع لـ سلطة أحد 💙. ࠝ𓏺 𝙽𝙾𝚄𝚁

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ne16e. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒎𝒆 𓏺 ࠝ” (@ne16e), 285 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ne16e.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.