Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Тебе необхоДима

@ne0bhoDima

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

42subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002104887787
TypeChannel
Username@ne0bhoDima
DescriptionЗдесь нет одной темы Мой способ смотреть и вмешиваться·
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ne0bhoDima

Growth

427 August 2026 — 42 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–43 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:1642no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:2142first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
133.3%
avg views ÷ 42 subscribers
Avg views / post
56.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (30 December 202531 July 2026)
Views total112
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
101
Videos
7
Links
14

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 11s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4130.6%
custom 54115122787406403091611.9%
custom 54002541515505766221410.4%
👾139.70%
🔥118.21%
👀96.72%
custom 522663974510633055164.48%
custom 537097116331069356253.73%
👏53.73%
❤‍🔥21.49%
🗿21.49%
🍓10.746%
👍10.746%
👨‍💻10.746%
💊10.746%
💯10.746%
😨10.746%
🤔10.746%
🤝10.746%
🤡10.746%
1 further kind10.746%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC39 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

2 отчёта по цене одного. Ждали — кушайте. Вообще кто придумал июнь и июль отличать одной буквой? Я лет до 20 их путал. Как видите, последствия остались. Ну, летсгёу Июнь 1 июня я встречал рассвет на поле около дома. Вокруг туман, одуванчики, и я снимаю TikTok под Damn… а, ONDA ANDAR Это поле потом сильно сыграло мне на руку. Я наснимал там много всего и вообще рад, что рядом с домом оказался такой спаун Весь июнь

2custom 54002541515505766222custom 54115122787406403092

22 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC73 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

3👀3custom 53709711633106935622

10 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTC125 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Отчет за май Май хотел быть ласковым, но по факту был не таким уж солнечным и приветливым. Ни ты, ни я, никто на свете не бьёт так сильно по настроению, как погода в Петербурге. И май в этом плане отличился. Месяц был не в том же бешеном ритме контента, как апрель. И сначала я приуныл - ну всё, приехали, сейчас опять всё расползётся. Но ретрит + мой бот следов показали другую картину. Май был не месяцем разгона, а

3👀2👾2custom 52266397451063305511

1 Jun 2026, 07:31 UTC119 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

До лета 00000 дней!!! Всех поздравляю, мы дожили) Влог с прошлого лета, который обещал выложить ещё в палеолите Там тепло, зелень, движ и все улики того, что лето существует Желаю всем прожить его фоном, а запоминающимися воспоминаниями✨

2👾2custom 54002541515505766222

20 May 2026, 06:40 UTC134 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Я много лет пытался сделать из своих щупалец бур. Долгое время я реально не понимал, что со мной не так. Я много сидел в саморазвитии, бизнесе, карьере, и там везде был один главный тейк- выбери одну сферу, сфокусируйся, заманьчь её и стань топ-1. Красивая инструкция к успеху, но работает если человек - буррр Но у меня раз за разом не работало. Я загорался, углублялся, делал, терпел, а потом терял интерес, перекл

3custom 54002541515505766222custom 54115122787406403092

6 May 2026, 06:01 UTC140 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Отчет за апрель Месяц вышел контентым и быстрым как внимание школьника в тик-токе Да, в этом отчёте будет много Тик-Тока, потому что я выкладывал туда 3-4 видео в неделю, и это не могло пройти бесследно. Каждую неделю я прокачивал Тик-Ток-Интеллект звучит несовместимо, но такова реальность В Тик-Токе, чем легче и кринжовее ты записал видео, чем больше тебе стыдно его опубликовывать, тем выше шанс, что оно сработае

3👾2👀1custom 54002541515505766221

1 May 2026, 08:16 UTC112 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Я пользуюсь ии чатами, чаще всего GPT Я обращался наверное по каждому вопросу своей жизни. Кроме секса, конечно, его у меня просто нет И кажется здорово, зашарил за все, но вот в чем подвох Ии потрясающе справляется задачами, где нужно посчитать, сопоставить, перелопатить кучу материала механически. Проблема стартует, когда начинаешь делать задачи, где нет чисто механического решения. Где нужно не собрать информаци

3custom 52266397451063305513custom 54002541515505766222

22 Apr 2026, 09:05 UTC121 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Проблема мессенджера МАКС не в том, что его продвигают сверху. А в том, что у него нет истории. Людей не заставить полюбить мессенджер только потому, что он надежный, НАШ и ловит даже в аду. Люди покупают легенды, мифы к которым им хочется быть причастными. И даже МАКСу нужна легенда, как минимум это заставляет скачивать и посмотреть, а что там такое, давайте дам свой вариант. Жил-был один смышленый парнишка по и

custom 540025415155057662231👀1

15 Apr 2026, 07:25 UTC113 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Вы замечали, что текст управляет вашим дыханием? Когда вы читаете, вы воспринимаете текст не только глазами. Вы ещё и внутренне проговариваете его. Даже молча. А значит, подключается тело. Короткая фраза - это одно ощущение. Удар. Остановка. Поворот. Вдох. Ещё одна. И ещё. Текст начинает идти рывками. Сжимает воздух. Держит. А можно написать совсем иначе - так, чтобы фраза не резала, а текла спокойно и длинно,

2custom 52266397451063305512

8 Apr 2026, 07:54 UTC123 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Людей сейчас всё сильнее тянет к локальному. И это не просто мода. Когда мир штормит, меньше всего хочется ещё одного разговора обо всём. Хочется стоять прочнее на земле и взаимодействовать с тем, что рядом. С тем, что можно пощупать, узнать по лицу. Отсюда и тяга к нишевым блогам, локальным брендам, маленьким комьюнити, своим медиа. Люди стали не провинциальнее. А из-за того что вокруг слишком много шума, тревоги,

2🗿1custom 53709711633106935621

2 Apr 2026, 08:30 UTC120 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ОТчёт за март Вчера был шуточный отчёт, посмеялись? Сейчас не до шуток. Вокруг нестабильно, но отчёты как маленький островок надёжности в этом хаосе. Насчёт тг, блокировок. Скажу так: я начал вести инстаграм и работать там после того, как её заблокировали в рф, и нормально, до сих пор там сижу, кто-то даже зарабатывает. С тг планирую так же, сейчас хотелось бы ещё подписчиков, а то только отписки. Щас ещё половина

custom 54115122787406403099

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ne0bhoDima. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 749,790 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тебе необхоДима” (@ne0bhoDima), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ne0bhoDima.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.