Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ncip.by

@ncip_belarus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

728subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001561410907
TypeChannel
Username@ncip_belarus
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ncip_belarus

Growth

7287 Aug 2026, 06:47 — 728 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:37 — 728 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:477 Aug 2026, 10:37
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 727–729 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 10:37728no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:47728first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.1%
avg views ÷ 728 subscribers
Avg views / post
183
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,922
Reactions total145
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

145 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10874.5%
1510.3%
🔥96.21%
❤‍🔥85.52%
🥰42.76%
👏10.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC38 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚙️ 90 гадоў Пятру Аляксандравічу Віцязю, вучонаму ў галіне распрацоўкі новых матэрыялаў, акадэміку НАН Беларусі, доктару тэхнічных навук, прафесару. 🦾 Пётр Аляксандравіч – адзін з першапраходцаў беларускай парашковай металургіі. 🔹Пад яго кіраўніцтвам і пры яго асабістым удзеле распрацавана звыш 80 новых тэхналогій і матэрыялаў. 🔹Вобласці прымянення: сельскагаспадарчае машынабудаванне, аўтамабілебудаванне, станкабуд

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC58 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#кожная_пятніца_роднае_сваё Фота: Наталля Капралава

👍3🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC142 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📣 🎓Национальный центр интеллектуальной собственности проводит международный Конкурс на лучшую работу в сфере интеллектуальной собственности в 2025-2026 учебном году 📧 Срок подачи заявок – по 15 октября 2026 г. Номинации: 🔹Лучшая магистерская диссертация в сфере ИС 🔹Лучшая дипломная работа в сфере ИС 🔹Лучшая курсовая работа в сфере ИС 🔹Лучшая статья в сфере ИС 🔹Лучшее эссе в сфере ИС 🔹Лучшая работа практикующего спе

👍5🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC239 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💻 В Республиканской научно-технической библиотеке и ее филиалах открыт бесплатный доступ к электронным и аудиокнигам научно-технической, научно-популярной и деловой тематики электронной библиотеки Литрес. Литрес – это крупная виртуальная библиотека, доступная на любом устройстве и позволяющая читать и слушать книги в любое время. ✔️Обширный каталог – более 1 млн электронных и аудиокниг. ✔️ Книги можно скачать и чи

👍8

5 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC179 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌 Актуальные материалы ВОИС – на сайте Национального центра интеллектуальной собственности! В разделе «Методические рекомендации и разъяснения» вы найдете обновленные материалы Всемирной организации интеллектуальной собственности, подготовленные с учетом последних изменений правил и практик в сфере ИС. Что внутри: ✔️ Теоретическая база и практические рекомендации ✔️ Пошаговые инструкции ✔️ Ответы на часто задаваем

👍6🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC191 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📖 В № 3 (2026) журнала «Интеллектуальная собственность в Беларуси» опубликована статья «Добровольная регистрация и депонирование объектов авторского права и смежных прав в Республике Беларусь». Автор – Нина Дубовик, ведущий специалист научно-образовательного отдела управления научно-образовательной и издательской деятельности НЦИС. 📝 Статья освещает теорию и практику, а также особенности и преимущества добровольной

👍115❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC170 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❇️ Продолжается прием материалов для сборника VI Международной научно-практической конференции НЦИС в сфере интеллектуальной собственности. Все заинтересованные могут направить материалы для опубликования в сборнике конференции. Тематика конференции: ✅ патентование РИД, созданных в сфере креативных индустрий; ✅ авторское право и ИИ: интересы авторов и правообладателей; ✅ контрафакт в цифровую эпоху: новые вызовы и

👍53

4 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC147 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎓 26 августа НЦИС проведёт обучающий курс «Профессиональная деятельность оценщиков объектов интеллектуальной собственности». В роли спикеров - ведущие эксперты в сфере ИС: 💠 Владимир Уваров, ведущий экономист ООО «ИПМ-Консалт оценка», оценщик ОИС; 💠 Дмитрий Андриевский, начальник управления содействия коммерциализации и государственных реестров НЦИС; 💠 Инесса Падунович, основатель Группы компаний «ИПМ-Консалт», пред

👍9

4 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC190 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌐 19 августа в 10:00 состоится вебинар Евразийского патентного ведомства и Российской государственной академии интеллектуальной собственности «Проверка патентоспособности промышленных образцов: опыт Евразийского патентного ведомства». В центре внимания: ▪️ экспертиза заявок на евразийские патенты на промышленные образцы: общий обзор; ▪️ ЕАПО в Гаагской системе регистрации промышленных образцов: новые возможности для

👍52

3 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC210 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✳️ Напомним: в НЦИС проходят консультации специалистов Центра поддержки технологий и инноваций при Белорусском обществе изобретателей и рационализаторов! 4 августа с 10.00 до 13.00 прием посетителей будет осуществлять замдиректора Центра трансфера технологий ООО "Апсель" по информационным технологиям, член БОИР Александр Селедцов. ☑️ ЦПТИ БОИР проводит консультации по вопросам интеллектуальной собственности, включа

👍5

3 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC212 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✨ Сертификат подлинности – это гарантия или просто бумажка? ✨ Национальный центр интеллектуальной собственности продолжает цикл полезных видео! 🖼 В новом ролике разбираемся, что такое сертификат подлинности, какую юридическую функцию он выполняет и какую силу имеет в суде. 🔎 А также: Почему для произведения искусства может быть важен провенанс? Какие права передаются при покупке предмета искусства? 👇 Ответы на эт

👍6❤‍🔥2🥰1

3 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC229 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📚 В августе в Республиканской научно-технической библиотеке проходит тематическая выставка «Патентование результатов интеллектуальной деятельности». Здесь представлены книги и журналы, материалы сборников конференций по патентованию, охране прав на объекты интеллектуальной собственности как в Беларуси, так и за рубежом. ☑️ Для кого: изобретатели, ученые, предприниматели, юристы, патентные поверенные, студенты и все

👍4🥰3

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ncip_belarus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 482,587 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ncip.by” (@ncip_belarus), 728 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ncip_belarus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.