Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for شرح نواقض الإسلام

Channel

شرح نواقض الإسلام

@navaqiduislam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

897subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001760537017
TypeChannel
Username@navaqiduislam
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 13 October 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/navaqiduislam

Growth

890897893.58 September 2026 — 890 subscribers8 September 2026 — 890 subscribers10 September 2026 — 892 subscribers18 September 2026 — 897 subscribers8 September 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 889–898 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:22897+5
10 Sept 2026, 21:59892+2
8 Sept 2026, 07:22890no change
8 Sept 2026, 06:47890first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 October 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 02:24 UTC619 viewsread 8 September 2026
Forwarded from @usulusunnaimamahmadPhoto

https://t.me/aqidatusalafi

10 Jul 2026, 02:24 UTC599 viewsread 8 September 2026
Forwarded from @usulusunnaimamahmad

للتقليل من القنوات جعلنا قناة جامعة لعقائد السلف :

1 May 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,140 viewsread 8 September 2026
Forwarded from @kitabutavhidiPoll

هل ترغبون في نشر تسجيل شرح كتب أخرى ؟

  1. نعم85%
  2. لا4%
  3. نفقد مثل هذا13%
  4. لا داعي1%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Mar 2024, 15:22 UTC≈9,060 viewsread 8 September 2026
File

2:45 "من مات يشرك بالله شيئا دخل النار» الحديث 3:55 الفرق بين المرتد و الكافر 4:27 ما يترتب على المشرك من أحكام الدنيا: 4:30 منها: أنه تطلق زوجته منه إذا كان متزوجا حتى أن يتوب 7:02 و منها: أنه إذا مات لا يصلى عليه و لا يغسل 7:22 و منها: أنه لا يدفن في مقابر المسلمين 7:39 و منها: أنه لا يدخل مكة 8:50 و منها: انه لا يرث و لا يورث 18:37 ما هي العبادة؟ 22:28 العبادة: الأوامر و النواهي 30:22 من الشرك دعاء غير

1 Mar 2024, 11:33 UTC≈7,030 viewsread 8 September 2026
File

المسائل : 1:54 ذكر عشرة النواقض على البيان ليس على الحصر 2:42 العدد و ذكره لا يدل على الحصر 3:22 ما هو العلم؟ 3:55 ما حكم إنسان إن مات على الكفر؟ 4:30 العلم هو اليقين 5:19 إذا كان الشخص الواحد يرتكب أكثر من نواقض و تاب من أحدها لا تكفيه التوبة 7:51 من هو الذي تحت المشيئة ؟ 12:37 "الوائدة و الموءودة في النار" الحديث 15:37 الشرك في الحقيقة هو الناقض الذي يشمل جميع النواقض 16:10 إبليس مشرك و شركه هواه 17:20

28 Feb 2024, 13:24 UTC≈6,250 viewsread 8 September 2026
File

0:37 القول عن الكتاب "نواقض الإسلام" 2:22 الدخول في الإسلام سهل و لين و هو واجب على كل واحد 3:08 من الغلط أخذ الجزء من الآية و الاستدلال بها على أنه يجوز لكل واحد ألا يدخل في الإسلام 4:45 الدخول في الإسلام ممكن و كذلك الخروج منه (قد يدري عن خروجه و قد لا يدري عنه) 5:06 لماذا نتعلم نواقض الإسلام؟ 5:26 معرفة الكلمة "النواقض" 6:27 لا يوجد التقسيم الجامع إلا هذا التقسيم… 7:38 نشهد بالنار عينا لمن مات و هو مشرك 9:

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @navaqiduislam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 May 2026, 14:38 UTCFinal Results97 voters

هل ترغبون في نشر تسجيل شرح كتب أخرى ؟

  1. نعم85%
  2. لا4%
  3. نفقد مثل هذا13%
  4. لا داعي1%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2022 to 10 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شرح نواقض الإسلام” (@navaqiduislam), 897 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/navaqiduislam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.