Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

аргументы на главного ирл фана киссера кинна подушки жены возлюбленной гф нацуки от миринки

@natsukigf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

6subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002131997017
TypeChannel
Username@natsukigf
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/natsukigf

Growth

611 Aug 2026, 16:47 — 6 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 23:16 — 6 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 16:4712 Aug 2026, 23:16
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5–7 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:166no change
11 Aug 2026, 16:476first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 2 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
54
Links
13

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓5363.1%
💘2833.3%
33.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2025 to 13 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 May 2025, 12:21 UTC130 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💘51🍓1

13 May 2025, 12:16 UTC127 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @myn4tsukiPhoto

cr : @chips_02

💘5🍓2

13 May 2025, 12:09 UTC136 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

нацуки от астерон для меня!! https://t.me/nocokck

🍓4💘2

13 May 2025, 12:05 UTC142 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

это мне комишку стекло за 60 рублс нарисовала!! https://t.me/lovesteklomef

🍓4💘2

13 May 2025, 12:05 UTC105 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @lovesteklomefPhoto

комыши комыши комыши комыши 60 рублей

🍓4💘31

14 Feb 2025, 10:14 UTC152 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓4💘41

19 Jan 2025, 08:50 UTC141 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ddlc_kinn

. . ❤🫀❤ ; Да, я кинню Нацуки, и я боюсь открываться людям Да, я кинню и. . . | @ddlckinand

🍓3

19 Jan 2025, 08:50 UTC151 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ddlc_kinn

. . ❤🫀❤ ; Да, я кинню Нацуки, и качество друзей для меня важнее количества Да, я кинню и. . . | @ddlckinand

🍓4

19 Jan 2025, 08:50 UTC151 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ddlc_kinn

. . ❤🫀❤ ; Да, я кинню Нацуки, и я ненавижу чувствовать себя виноватой Да, я кинню и. . . | @ddlckinand

🍓4

19 Jan 2025, 08:50 UTC144 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ddlc_kinnPhoto

:: Киннишь Нацуки? Типо хочешь быть милой? WHAT THE FUCK🫀 Да, я кинню и. . . | @ddlckinand

🍓4💘2

13 Jan 2025, 06:04 UTC152 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ddlc_kinn

. . ❤🫀❤ ; Да, я кинню Нацуки, и люди часто спрашивают меня «когда ты уже вырастешь?» Да, я кинню и. . . | @ddlckinand

🍓2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @natsukigf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 990,030 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“аргументы на главного ирл фана киссера кинна подушки жены возлюбленной гф нацуки от миринки” (@natsukigf), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natsukigf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.