Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Natsucchi🏳‍🌈

Channel

Natsucchi🏳‍🌈

@natsucchinyan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

119subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001413599803
TypeChannel
Username@natsucchinyan
DescriptionХудожниця та письменниця. Квір та нейровідмінна. Обожнюю чай та солодке. Багато говорю❤️
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/natsucchinyan

Growth

1199 Aug 2026, 04:15 — 119 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 04:30 — 119 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 04:159 Aug 2026, 04:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 118–120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 04:30119no change
9 Aug 2026, 04:15119first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.8%
avg views ÷ 119 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.8
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held14 (3 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total529
Reactions total63
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,410
Videos
28
Links
337

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5485.7%
🔥46.35%
❤‍🔥34.76%
23.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC19 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Отже, артик у процесі. Вже рендер пішов, але я ще визначаюся зі ступенем деталізації. А ще я зробила прикольну завівку двом своїм лялькам. Правда шампунь не дуже добре змила (незручність ірландських раковин), але вклалося нічого так. По свободке треба сфоткати)

2

8 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC18 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @rankovyychayokPhoto

🌴🏖 Лотерея 🏖🌴 Трохи літнього вайбу для ваших персонажів) Для участі потрібно: 🏖Підписка на цей канал, якщо вам подобається моя творчість 🏖 Зробити репост цього посту на свій канал або 3 друзям 🏖 Надіслати скріншот репосту в коментарі та свій порядковий номер 🏆 Переможець буде один (Якщо буде багато учасників зроблю більше) 📅 Результати: 15.08.2026 Речі які я можу зробити з ючем: 🍹 Покласти в холодильник будь-

8 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC21 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @events_ukrartPhoto

САМОПІАР Посилання: https://t.me/makytaao/1119 Кінець: 10.08 23:00 #самопіар

8 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC25 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @events_ukrartPhoto

САМОПІАР Посилання: https://t.me/hacianitta/640 Кінець: 11.08 17:00 #самопіар

7 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC38 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @livkan1Photo

Дев'ятий реквест для @Natschann готовий 🥀 #арт #реквест

5

6 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC49 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Спойлерю #спойлер #віп

10❤‍🔥31

6 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC44 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @livkan1

Ну що ж, давайте реквестики? Скидайте рефи своїх персонажів в коментарі ;3 Реквести прийматиму до 25.08

61

4 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTC62 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Отримала Твайлу G1. Чекаю, поки прийде G3, щоб їх порівняти. Ця Твайла дуже гарна. Волосся досі в хорошому стані. Правда є питання до шарнирів і до техніки з якої паяли її ноги. Але так дуже мила й файна. Й мабуть найменша за ростом моя лялька. Навіть Хоуліша не така низькоросла була. Персонаж Твайли дуже близький мені по духу й стилю. Треба би виділити час й передивитися пару трійку повнометрів з G1 й серіал по G3 #

10

4 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @janescreenwriterPhoto

🔮↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️🔮 ↗️↗️ ↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️ by @janescreenwriter Набір на івент! Суть івенту Учасникам буде видано невелика історія, по якій вони мають створити ілюстрацію Що треба буде зробити↗️ ☑️Намалювати роботу (арт має бути завершеним та з фоном (середній або складний)) ☑️Зробити розмовне відео з спідпеінтом (приблизно на 5 хв, можно трох менше) ☑️Дедлайн на все буде місяць Подати анкету ☑️ ☑️Репост цього пос

2

4 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC46 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @readeat_officialPhoto

Унаслідок чергової ворожої атаки постраждав логістичний центр корпорації «RNK-Ranok», де зберігалися книжки видавництв «Ранок», «READBERRY», «Жорж», «Фабула», «Ще одну сторінку», «Varvar Publishing», «Основа», «Своє», «Korali Books», «Кенгуру» та «4mamas». Щиро співчуваємо командам видавництв і сподіваємося, що вдасться врятувати якомога більше книжок. Підтримати видавництва можна вже зараз, обираючи їхні книжки. К

1

4 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC42 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

бачила багато постів щодо зруйнованих складів. як же боляче... після фактор другу всі ці влучення стали ще більшим цвяхом у труну. але хрен вам, русня, це свях погнеться й ви собі відхуярити ваші брудні пальці молотком і в труну ми покладемо вас. і вдало.ї ми витримаємо

5

4 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @empaths_kaulits

Збирався з силами всі ці дні. Після атаки на склад "Ранку" стало відомо, що також постраждали книжки 📚 "Кондору", віддані на реалізацію. Тобто там були Емпати, Дискрет, Ангели, Виродок та інші книги.. І попередній удар по типографії "Конві" так само зупинив робочі процеси в-ва. І саме там, до речі, мали друкуватися Інсайдери, але, на жаль.. Тому якщо давно хотіли придбати якусь книжку в "Кондорі" - зробіть це зара

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @natsucchinyan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 281,353 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Natsucchi🏳‍🌈” (@natsucchinyan), 119 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natsucchinyan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.