Channel
@natsecjeff
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
748subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001211244445 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @natsecjeff |
| Created | 17 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/natsecjeff |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 748 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 749 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 750 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 753 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 759 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 759 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
RT @mSaleemJaved: @ImranKhanPTI Forced divorces? Were PTI politicians married to each other/PTI? Those who were brought to PTI were asked to leave PTI. As simple as that. Human rights organizations or ‘bloody liberals’, in your words, were suffocated during your rule. They’re hardly breathing. — FJ (@Natsecjeff) May 23, 2023
RT @patchfacee: So many times one feels like condemning what's happening right now, and you should. But then you remember the smugness of this entitled lot when "they" were doing it to "others" https://t.co/nNkt4UfdwE https://t.co/OPb9Fu7iJH — FJ (@Natsecjeff) May 23, 2023
😭 https://t.co/Q9NwBaOi6p — FJ (@Natsecjeff) May 23, 2023
RT @KhadijaKhan__: He blamed the rape crisis in Pakistan on women and now he is applauding the same Pakistani women. Not because he has any respect for them. He is just trying to protect his fading political career. He is a pathetic excuse for a man. https://t.co/npCQ0PKkFo — FJ (@Natsecjeff) May 23, 2023
RT @ch_sajaad: بولیں بچے تعلیم سے چھڑوا سکتی ہوں میاں کو سیاست چھوڑنے کا نہیں کہہ سکتی۔ انکے برونائی میں موجود ایک دوست نے بعد میں مالی خیال رکھا وقت گزرا اور یوسف اسی ملک کا وزیراعظم بنا۔ — FJ (@Natsecjeff) May 23, 2023
RT @ch_sajaad: اخراجات کی فیس تک ادا نہیں ہو پا رہی ہمارے کچھ بینک اکاونٹس تک رسائی دی جائے جبکہ حکومت کا ان سے کچھ لینا دینا نہیں خالد نے کہا میں مشرف صاحب سے بات کرتا ہوں دس منٹ میں واپس آئے کہنے لگے پیپلز پارٹی چھوڑ دیں ق میں آجائیں بیگم گیلانی نے کہا یہ ناممکن ہے بولے پھر سیاست چھوڑ دیں — FJ (@Natsecjeff) May 23, 2023
RT @ch_sajaad: یوسف گیلانی جیل میں تھے انکے تمام بینک اکاونٹس منجمد تھے مالی حالات سے تنگ ہو کر انکی زوجہ محترمہ اپنے ماموں جو کہ فیڈرل سیکرٹری رہ چکے تھے کے ساتھ ہمارے گھر تشریف لائیں اور مجھے کہا گورنر جنرل خالد مقبول کے پاس لیکر چلو وہاں گئے تو بیگم یوسف گیلانی نے کہا کہ ہمارے بچوں کے تعلیمی https://t.co/zXU5i86ubD — FJ (@Natsecjeff) May 23, 2023
LOL. They're dead. You killed them. https://t.co/798YOmnpe1 https://t.co/IxbrBSAxK6 — FJ (@Natsecjeff) May 23, 2023
Whatever my disagreements with some of Benazir Bhutto's policies and decisions, being a woman she endured so much worse and still kept a brave face. https://t.co/SCTQqfNOak — FJ (@Natsecjeff) May 23, 2023
RT @Shehzad89: When you make parties based on convenience rather than ideology don't be surprised that the electables the Military Establishment put in your party jump ship when it is no longer convenient for them to be a part of it. Mangay tangay kee parties ideological stand nahee le sakti — FJ (@Natsecjeff) May 23, 2023
RT @HamzaAzhrSalam: Those who live by the establishment die by the establishment. — FJ (@Natsecjeff) May 23, 2023
RT @AfghanAnalyst2: Ghazi Media Network released a Pashto video Nasheed praising a senior member of TTP's leadership council, Omar Khorasani as replacement for the slain commander, Omar Khalid Khorasani, who was killed last year in an explosion in Afghanistan. https://t.co/J5x96BWr2T — FJ (@Natsecjeff) May 23, 2023
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @natsecjeff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@natsecjeff named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Natsecjeff - News, Conflicts, Militancy, Terrorism, OSINT” (@natsecjeff), 748 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natsecjeff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.