🖤🪶🪶🤩 А вообще, я просто очень рада, что смогу посмотреть на множество красивых выступлений по китаефандому 🤗
🥰3

Channel
@natiraa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
199subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001609031696 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @natiraa |
| Description | Будь принцессой, рыцарем, драконом, колдуном, Лишь в зеркале встречаясь со своим врагом. |
| Created | 12 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/natiraa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 199 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 199 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (27 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 698 |
| Reactions total | 113 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
113 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5303083973927252368 | 21 | 18.6% | |
| 🥰 | 21 | 18.6% | |
| custom 5395386965761742203 | 17 | 15.0% | |
| 💘 | 11 | 9.73% | |
| custom 5253481817532565884 | 8 | 7.08% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 7.08% | |
| custom 5413825586780980243 | 7 | 6.19% | |
| custom 5406967928463587180 | 4 | 3.54% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.54% | |
| custom 5215656113571125993 | 3 | 2.65% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 2.65% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 2.65% | |
| custom 5398031110837903390 | 2 | 1.77% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.885% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🖤🪶🪶🤩 А вообще, я просто очень рада, что смогу посмотреть на множество красивых выступлений по китаефандому 🤗
🥰3
🖤🪶🪶🤩 Ура-ура, прекрасные вечерние новости! Мы с моими хорошиками прошли на ПГ ✨ Не совсем в Китайцах, но я очень рада возможности просто покайфовать на сцене 🤌
custom 53030839739272523687custom 52534818175325658841
🖤🪶🪶🤩 Как говорится, раз в год и фоточки выкладываются 😅 Вообще в архивах у меня было что-то ещё, но всё руки не доходят нормально разгрести..
🥰4❤3
Тихий уголок 🍃 pinned a photo
🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤩 🤍 🤍🤍 🤩🤩 𝑻𝒆𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒈𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒔𝒄𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒍𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒕 𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒎𝒆 𝑻𝒉𝒆𝒚 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒄𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒍𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒂𝒔 𝒍𝒐𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒔 𝒔𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒐𝒏𝒆'𝒍𝒍 𝒃𝒍𝒆𝒆𝒅 𝑺𝒐 𝒅𝒂𝒓𝒌𝒆𝒏 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒄𝒍𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒔 𝒐𝒓 𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒂 𝒗𝒊𝒐𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒆 𝑴𝒂𝒚𝒃𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒚'𝒍𝒍 𝒍𝒆𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒂𝒍𝒐𝒏𝒆, 𝒃𝒖𝒕 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒎𝒆 🤍🤍 🤩 🌹 🤩 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍 𝑺𝒕𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒆, 𝑹𝒐𝒃𝒊𝒏, 𝑩𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒌 𝑺𝒘𝒂𝒏, 𝑴𝒂𝒓𝒄𝒉 7𝒕𝒉, 𝑫𝒂𝒏 𝑯𝒆𝒏𝒈, 𝑭𝒊𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒍𝒚, 𝑺𝒂𝒎𝒑𝒐 🤍🤍 𝑷𝒉 𝒃𝒚 - 𝑺𝑼𝑨𝑽 𝑯𝒆𝒍𝒑 - 𝑹𝒂𝒇𝒚
💘9custom 54138255867809802436custom 53953869657617422035🥰2⚡1custom 52534818175325658841
🖤🪶🪶🤩 Кажется, я больше не хочу иметь дел с Авито-доставкой через Почту... Вы не представляете, в каком лютом расстройстве я сейчас сижу. В начале июля довелось мне всё же доползти до «Системы», и настолько меня затянуло, что я захотела её себе на полочку. Заказала у милой девушки на Авито все четыре тома (а Система выпускалась безумно красивой), а потом они просто застряли в сортировочном центре Санкт-Петербурга. Ну…
💔8🕊3
🖤🪶🪶🤩 Диалог с родственниками буквально: —Ты хочешь в Китай? —Да, очень —А что тебя там привлекает? —Культура (Мерч по новеллам и Таобао) Нет, Культура меня тоже привлекает, но.. Хочется простого человеческого счастья, поехать в отпуск в Китай 🥞
custom 53953869657617422037custom 53030839739272523683🥰2
🖤🪶🪶🤩 Хьюстон, у нас проблемы! Знаете, обычно я ловлю гиперфиксы на фандомы, на персонажей, на динамику — это уже считай обыденность. Но впервые за очень долгое время я словила гиперфикс на цвет! На цвет, чёрт возьми! Точнее, на несколько оттенков зелёного... Теперь мне очень нужно найти вещи именно в этих оттенках 🥞 Спасите? Я вообще не понимаю, каким образом мой мозг умудрился дойти до такой гиперфиксации!
custom 53953869657617422034🔥2custom 53980311108379033902custom 53030839739272523681
🖤🪶🪶🤩 Мы не знаем, что это такое. Если бы мы знали, что это такое, но мы не знаем. Очень внезапный образ для меня, но раз уж руки не доходят до полноценных постов, скину вам небольшую примерочку. Не уверена, конечно, что буду её фоткать (потому что проблемы с восприятием вновь начали меня кушать), но выгуляю на фестивале, если повезёт 🤩
custom 530308397392725236810custom 52534818175325658844custom 52156561135711259933🔥1
🖤🪶🪶🤩 Мой небольшой отпуск подходит к концу, и я уже вернулась в город, но спешу поделиться с вами фотографиями! Просто мне пообещали отдых, экскурсию, шашлыки и домашнее вино 🤌 А кто я такая, чтобы отказываться? В итоге, отдых выдался просто замечательным! Спасибо моей хорошей за него! 🥰
🥰10custom 54069679284635871804💘2custom 52534818175325658842🔥1custom 53953869657617422031custom 54138255867809802431
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @natiraa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 595,536 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тихий уголок 🍃” (@natiraa), 199 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natiraa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.