Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НАТЕЛЛА ПИШЕТ ...

Channel

НАТЕЛЛА ПИШЕТ ...

@natellaavsyuk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

121subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002052184811
TypeChannel
Username@natellaavsyuk
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/natellaavsyuk

Growth

120121120.57 August 2026 — 120 subscribers9 August 2026 — 120 subscribers14 August 2026 — 121 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 120–121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:15121+1
9 Aug 2026, 04:02120no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:29120first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.1%
avg views ÷ 121 subscribers
Avg views / post
40.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
38.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held18 (28 April 202624 July 2026)
Views total80
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

216 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4621.3%
👍2511.6%
🔥2511.6%
🤣2210.2%
😱136.02%
💯125.56%
😍125.56%
💋104.63%
🤗83.70%
❤‍🔥73.24%
👀73.24%
💔73.24%
🤩73.24%
🙏62.78%
👏31.39%
😈31.39%
🤔31.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 18 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @natellaavsyuk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 April 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 14:34 UTC36 views16 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

#мемдня ну или немного про меня :))

🤣8💯5👍3

23 Jul 2026, 14:12 UTC44 views15 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟начала читать новую книгу и ... выбор, если честно, был очевиден! последние несколько лет я одновременно работаю над несколькими проектами и каждый день взаимодействую с разными командами где-то процессы выстроены временем, где-то всё держится исключительно на людях, а где-то наоборот спасают лишь четко прописанные регламенты и чем больше я наблюдаю, тем сильнее понимаю, что хочу ещё глубже разобраться в теме ком

7👍4🔥4

17 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC70 views18 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

☝🏼МОРАЛЬ СЕЙ БАСНИ ТАКОВА если кто-то тут подумывает стать предпринимателем, и думает что: "да что там такого, я буду делать все вовремя и по закону, чего все так ноют из-за этих ИПэшных дел" БУДЬТЕ ГОТОВЫ К ТОМУ, ЧТО: 1. с гос.структурами не все зависит от нас (мой вам живой пример с подачей декларации рассказала в кружке выше) 2. даже если вы все сделаете правильно, это никак не гарантирует вам спокойную ИПэ

🤗85👍5

17 Jul 2026, 15:37 UTC62 views6 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4💋2

17 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC64 views8 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3💋3💔2

17 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC65 views8 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3💋3💔2

17 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC68 views8 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3💔3💋2

17 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC69 views15 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

пу пу пууу ... сейчас будет крик души ... сорян, но мне нужно высказаться ⤵️

😱8👀4🤔3

14 Jul 2026, 12:41 UTC81 views13 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

TELEGRAM ИЗМЕНИЛ ... ссылки ... да да, очередное новое испытание в digital-сфере, к которому нас не готовили 😅 но что мы знаем точно, главное - выдохнуть, не паниковать и адаптироваться к новому 😉 что нужно сделать ⤵️ особенно тем, кто сейчас активно привлекаете аудиторию из других соцсетей нужно просто заменить старый формат ссылки на новый то есть, если у вас или у ваших экспертов есть ссылка на личку в телег

5🤣4🙏4

14 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC48 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @bothelp_channelPhoto

❗️Домен t.me заблокировали. Если вы публиковали ссылку на свой канал или бота, сейчас она может не открываться. Реестр зоны .me заблокировал домен t.me. Из-за этого короткие ссылки вида t.mе/usernаmе не открываются в обычных браузерах, других соцсетях и мессенджерах: ни на телефоне, ни на компьютере. Если вы используете инструменты BotHelp, ваши ссылки работают. Мы уже обновили мини-лендинги, виджет-кнопки и редире

😱5👀3🙏2

13 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC43 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😍6🤣4👍3

3 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC66 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

👀 нашествие бесплатных концертов в Москве, делюсь, может захочется сходить👀 4 июля, Лужники, начало в 13:00 Zivert, Ёлка, Мари Краймбрери, Artik & Asti, Pizza, Gayazovs Brothers, Mona, Лёша Свик, Бьянка и др. 4 июля, 19:00–20:00, у гостиницы «Метрополь», Самотечный сквер Фабрика, 5Sta Family 4 и 5 июля, начало в 12:00, Большой Строгинский затон Диана Арбенина, Тимати, Mayot 7 июля, начало в 17:00, ТЦ «Европолис»

😍6🔥3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @natellaavsyuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НАТЕЛЛА ПИШЕТ ...” (@natellaavsyuk), 121 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natellaavsyuk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.