5 measurements spanning 34 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95–98 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 16:59
97
-1
30 Aug 2026, 17:13
98
+1
15 Aug 2026, 01:53
97
+2
9 Aug 2026, 12:31
95
no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:45
95
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
175 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
64
36.6%
🔥
50
28.6%
👍
22
12.6%
👏
14
8.00%
👌
7
4.00%
🥰
7
4.00%
💯
5
2.86%
⚡
3
1.71%
❤🔥
3
1.71%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 16 we hold a reading for · 69%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @natasha_silkina_writer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
5.26%
1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
44.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
49.0
over 15 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGzYEZf
1
9 July 2026
9 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Можно ли пожалеть нечисть?
В сказках все обычно понятно. Вот человек, вот тварь, которая пришла за ним из леса, болота, воды или из-за печи. Тварь нужно обмануть, прогнать, запереть, пережить встречу с ней и желательно не оглядываться по дороге домой.
Но чем больше я пишу, тем чаще думаю, а почему она вообще появилась?
Среди славянской нечисти хватает тех, кого жалеть совершенно не хочется. Если нечто веками заманива…
Когда читаешь уже готовую книгу, все кажется простым. Герой что-то узнал, принял решение, куда-то поехал, с кем-то поговорил. Одно событие потянуло за собой другое, и история пошла дальше.
А когда пишешь, иногда достаточно задать себе вопрос: «Подожди. А откуда он вообще это знает?» — и все. Можно открывать сцену и переписывать. Хи-хи! 😂
Со мной как раз это и произошло. Писала очередную главу второй книги «Наследнико…
Я с самого начала говорила, что «Наследники» будут циклом. А сегодня наконец могу рассказать, что вторая книга уже начала свое существование не только у меня в голове, я ее пишу.
Рабочее название — «Эстимар». Пока именно рабочее, хотя с каждой новой главой я все больше убеждаюсь, что таким оно и останется. По крайней мере, другого названия я для этой книги уже не представляю.
Несколько глав написаны. Есть подробный п…
Кажется, новый график публикаций всё-таки учит меня дисциплине. Правда, пока довольно своеобразно. Хи-хи!😂
Вчера вечером мне нужно было подготовить сегодняшний пост. Но я уснула. Просто взяла и всё проспала.
Глаза открыла в 4:20. Потом довольно долго пыталась прийти в себя. Пока не особо получилось, но я стараюсь. Хи-хи! 😂
И вот сижу теперь, пишу этот пост и срочно изображаю человека, у которого всё идёт по плану, по…
Почему «Наследники»?
Обычно при слове наследство представляешь квартиру, старый дом, деньги или хотя бы бабушкин сервиз.
У моих героев, конечно, всё веселее. Хи-хи. 😂
Им досталось то, о чём в их семьях предпочитали молчать. Чужие решения, старые долги и последствия поступков, совершённых задолго до их рождения.
Люди, с которых всё началось, могли умереть, исчезнуть или убедить себя, что история давно закончена. Тольк…
Мне некогда писать, потому что я писатель! 😂
Кажется, я обнаружила главный писательский парадокс.
Последние дни я с утра до ночи занимаюсь книгами. Обновляю обложки, исправляю описания, готовлю публикации, привожу в порядок страницы в социальных сетях, разбираюсь с продвижением и делаю еще десяток вещей, о существовании которых когда-то даже не подозревала.
Все это действительно связано с моими книгами. Кроме одно…
Теперь могу сказать это официально и вслух: я — автор АСТ. 💪
Я несколько раз написала эту фразу и стирала ее снова и снова. Не потому, что не рада, наоборот — я счастлива так, что до сих пор не очень понимаю, куда себя деть. Просто некоторые события оказываются слишком большими для громких слов.
Моя «Алёнка» выйдет в АСТ, в импринте Nova Fiction. И это тот момент, которым мне хочется не хвастаться, а поделиться со …
Как звучит Бездворье после полуночи...
Когда придумываю место, мне недостаточно его увидеть. Мне обязательно нужно понять, как оно звучит.
И у Бездворья есть свой голос.
После полуночи где-нибудь обязательно скрипнет ставня. Тихо, словно её всего лишь задел ветер. У околицы коротко залает собака и тут же замолчит. В Костяном Лесу хрустнет ветка, будто кто-то идёт между деревьев и совершенно не боится быть услышанн…
Есть подарки, которые особенно дороги, потому что получены от особенного человека. ❤️
Недавно Татьяна Филатова подарила мне сразу две свои книги — «Врачебную тайну» и «Приют». Да ещё и с такими тёплыми автографами. Теперь у меня есть два настоящих авторских экземпляра, и я хожу вокруг них довольная, как книжный дракон. 😂
«Врачебную тайну» я уже прочитала. Это тревожная, довольно жёсткая история, которая постоянно з…
❤7🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @natasha_silkina_writer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Таш Эниклис — автор АСТ | Здесь водится нечисть👻” (@natasha_silkina_writer), 97 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natasha_silkina_writer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.