Channel
@natalynerpaart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
210subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001724794975 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @natalynerpaart |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/natalynerpaart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 210 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 211 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 211 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 16 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
53 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 33 | 62.3% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 30.2% | |
| custom 5382146612380311694 | 2 | 3.77% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.89% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.89% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 24 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Анализ рынка таков👇. И как я сама понаблюдала за движениями изнутри и не стала пока делать сайт... Отдельная тема — ярмарки искусства. Цены снижаются, не смотря ни на что. Многие художники и галереи демпингуют. А некотрые ярмарочные тенденции огорчают — меньше искусства, больше ремесла и просто поделок. #daily #art
Signed Nataly Nerpa
Что происходит с арт-рынком: главные выводы Art Basel & UBS Из нового ежегодного отчета, опубликованного недавно Art Basel и UBS, очевидными становятся следующие тенденции: 📈После двух лет спада, обусловленных макроэкономической турбулентностью, арт-рынок начал умеренное и неравномерное восстановление. 📈 Совокупный объём мировых продаж произведений искусства вырос на 4% (до $59,6 млрд), но всё ещё остается ниже пи…
Signed Nataly Nerpa
А у нашего пленэрного переделкинского сообщества опять выставка 31 марта открывается! Кураторы: Ольга Кукина и Игорь Гареев #exhibition #event #art
👍5
Signed Nataly Nerpa
Мучаюсь акварелью. Крашу — смываю — крашу — смываю... 50х40. «Игрушки моих мальчиков» #nerpaart #art
👍7🔥2🥰1
Signed Nataly Nerpa
Порядок!
👍3🔥2
Signed Nataly Nerpa
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥5
Signed Nataly Nerpa
Сегодня последний день нашей выставки МузАртЛит в Леге #art #exhibition
Signed Nataly Nerpa
Мелкий и салатик🥑 #children #daily
🔥5👍3
Signed Nataly Nerpa
Вот так. Пока было мерзко на улице — бегала, скакала. А как солнце шпарить начало, так мы с мелким с насморком засели! Здоровья всем. Фотка из Циферблата #daily
👍4
Signed Nataly Nerpa
Кажется, это нужно всем!👇
Signed Nataly Nerpa
Как вести дневник для ясности ума — #лекция Натаниэля Дрю Из лекции вы узнаете о ведении дневника для ясности ума, который позволяет расчистить "оперативную память" нашего мозга для более важных дел, меньше тревожиться и никогда не забывать о нужных вещах. Помимо прочего, дневник позволяет отслеживать процесс воспитания полезных привычек и понимать, что нужно улучшать для лучшего результата. Лекция на английском, но…
👍4
Signed Nataly Nerpa
Для вас, для вас и для вас уехали с выставки из галереи Минима и ждут новых хозяев буквицы старинного грузинского асомтаврули! Кому? Пишите! #nerpaart
👍4🔥2👏1
Signed Nataly Nerpa
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @natalynerpaart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,246,223 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NerpaArt” (@natalynerpaart), 210 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natalynerpaart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.