Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Наталья Мацак | Психолог | Нумеролог

Channel

Наталья Мацак | Психолог | Нумеролог

@nataliesholk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

220subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002248909543
TypeChannel
Username@nataliesholk
DescriptionПсихология, нумерология и живая женская правда. Про ясность, проявленность и силу без масок. Автор уникальной методики по работе с эмоциональным интеллектом «Кто сейчас за пультом?» Связь со мной @natalie_matsak
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nataliesholk

Growth

22012 Aug 2026, 21:48 — 220 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 22:01 — 220 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:4812 Aug 2026, 22:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 219–221 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:01220no change
12 Aug 2026, 21:48220first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.8%
avg views ÷ 220 subscribers
Avg views / post
41.4
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held12 (1 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total497
Reactions total99
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
483
Videos
71
Links
50

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

99 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3939.4%
🔥3333.3%
🤩1111.1%
🎉55.05%
👌44.04%
🕊33.03%
22.02%
💯22.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC28 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ну что… пора раскрывать карты… Помните, я писала про тот самый день, когда можно никуда не торопиться, ничего не решать и просто позволить себе отдыхать и кайфовать? Так вот… Мы решили не ждать идеального момента, а создать его сами. ЖИВОЙ ДЕНЬ У ВОДЫ 🌊 Собираем небольшую компанию в Москве и уезжаем на целый день к воде. • Без «надо» • Без списка дел на выходной • Без попытки впихнуть еще 150 задач между отдыхом

2💯2🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC32 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Есть одна фраза, из-за которой мы иногда пропускаем столько всего интересного: «Мне не с кем идти…» Одна подруга работает У другой дети Третья говорит: «Ой, сапы — это вообще не мое» И вроде самой хочется… Но потом начинается: «Ну одна я точно не поеду». «Я же там никого не знаю». «А вдруг все будут компаниями, а я одна?» «Может, в следующий раз…» И хорошая идея снова отправляется в папку «когда-нибудь». Я сама п

4🔥3🤩2

10 Aug 2026, 04:47 UTC27 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥64🤩4

6 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC54 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Я не хочу, чтобы это лето прошло только между работой, домом и привычными делами. Хочется его запомнить, чтобы потом открыть фотографии и вспомнить: «Оооо, а вот это был день!» Именно поэтому мы решили собрать небольшую компанию и устроить ЖИВОЙ ДЕНЬ У ВОДЫ 🌊 • Без конференций. • Без необходимости быть серьезными и правильными. Просто приезжаем к воде и отдыхаем: • Будем кататься на сапах 🏄‍♀️ • Общаться • Вкусно

5🔥4🤩3

5 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC53 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

А когда вы последний раз устраивали день только для себя? Не когда нужно съездить по делам Не когда «заодно заеду туда, потом сюда» Не когда вроде выходной, но к вечеру устала еще больше А настоящий день для себя?! Когда можно куда-нибудь уехать, сменить обстановку, познакомиться с новыми людьми, много смеяться, вкусно поесть, попробовать что-то новое. И главное - никуда не торопиться… Такие простые желания рань

52🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 04:50 UTC45 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всем доброго утра 🕊️ Желаю вам сегодня замечательного настроения и побольше приятных мыслей 🤍 И хочу с утра немного с вами поболтать… Как у вас сейчас с желаниями? Получается их исполнять или чаще откладываете на потом? А время для себя находите? Не между работой, домом и делами, а вот такое настоящее - когда можно хотя бы на несколько часов обо всем забыть и просто побыть собой. Иногда ведь так хочется куда-ни

6🔥4🕊3

2 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC53 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как же хорошо рядом с людьми, с которыми не нужно быть кем-то… Не нужно казаться веселее, умнее, интереснее. Не нужно думать, правильно ли тебя поймут. Можно просто быть собой. И именно такое чувство подарили мне эти выходные… Чувство счастья, комфорта, любви и какое-то особенное понимание, насколько прекрасна жизнь. За неделю мы с подругой договорились встретиться, потому что наши графики часто не совпадают. Вы

8🔥6👌4

1 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC48 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Катание на лодочке 🛥️ в копилку желаний У Тани это первый раз. Она ни разу не каталась и сегодня ее желание сбылось 🩵🕊️

🔥4

1 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC47 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🎉5

1 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC54 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сегодня день подруг и мы не могли упустить этот день. Приняли решение встретиться с моей подругой в парке горького. План: • катание на лодочке • вкуснейший лимонад • мороженое • море позитивного обещания В дружбе ценю искренность и когда ты такая какая есть, без масок 🩵

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @nataliesholk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 925,058 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Наталья Мацак | Психолог | Нумеролог” (@nataliesholk), 220 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nataliesholk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.