Что теперь будет с ТГ? ( мои прогнозы ) 🤣 Может быть бредом моих фантазий Вчера-сегодня очень много новостей про телегу, мне кажется, когда Instagram блокировали было меньше паники 😅👏🏾 Давайте по фактам 1. Telegram — это инфраструктура повседневной жизни всей России (чаты, платежи, переписки, клиенты и тд) 2. Рекламный рынок останется там, где есть аудитория — в telegram слишком большой объем продаж и понятная эк…

Channel
Масштабирование онлайн школ. Натали Эрте
@natalierte
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
210subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002144956227 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @natalierte |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/natalierte |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 210 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 211 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 211 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 26 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 38s
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
34 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 70.6% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 17.6% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2024 to 16 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @natalierte. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 October 2024 to 16 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Кто льет рся на канал в тг - актуально☝🏻
Исследование: сколько ботов льет Яндекс на самом деле Каждый раз, когда мы запускаем новую кампанию в Яндекс, первые несколько дней он откровенно сливает бюджет: кликов масса, а подписок нет. Обычно первые два дня идет мусорный трафик, а потом потихоньку начинаются подписки. Или… не начинаются. И вот мы сидим и репу чешем: это у нас плохая рекламная связка или Яндекс льет ботов? Так появилась новая фича в Откуда…
❤3
Исследование: сколько ботов в трафике Яндекса на самом деле Каждый раз одно и то же: запускаешь новую кампанию — кликов море, подписок ноль. И сидишь гадаешь: это связка не зашла или Яндекс снова льёт ботов? Полгода назад мы встроили в Откуда Подписки бота проверку на реальных людей. Если Telegram на устройстве открывается — это человек. Если нет — почти наверняка бот или «мусор». За 6 месяцев накопили статисти…
Из последнего: По результатам эфира: было собрано рекордное количество рег - 826 На канал мероприятия подписалось 600 чел, сравнимо с каналом эксперта. Рекордное количество участников эфира - 807, до этого максимум было - 500 Рекордное пиковое значение - 408, исторический максимум был 297 Рекордное количество заявок - 33, из них целевых 26. На второй эфир в рамках запуска реги не собирались. Всего зрителей 356 З…
🔥3❤1
Черная пятница: как ее провести, чтобы сделать Х2 по обороту? У меня есть много опыта в работе с базой и распродажах: любых, хоть на черную пятницу, хоть на Новый год, хоть на день рождения школы либо эксперта. Могу сделать зум и поделиться: — Как составлять пакеты на распродажу, чтобы было выгодно, и не обесценить продукт. — Нужен ли полезный контент на вебинаре по распродаже (ликвидации). — Какой визуал выбрать д…
❤1
жиза? #мемдня
👻2
Вчера на GetInsight - медиа о рынке онлайн-обучения от GetCourse и экспертов рынка вышла моя статья: "Распродажи без ошибок: как онлайн-школе удвоить оборот, даже если «база не покупает» Очень волнительно и приятно. Горужусь😇 Приёмы из этой статьи помогут вам, даже если: «Мы выжгли базу»; «Наша база больше не покупает»; «Ой, да делали мы вашу распродажу, толку ноль»; «Акции у нас не работают»; «Не хотим обесцениват…
❤5🔥3👏1
Готовимся к 1 сентября, так сказать.
👏1
Сегодня выступаю здесь с темой "Как игропрактику найти клиентов, как продвигать себя", буду делиться опытом по продвижению
❤9
Всем привет! 19.12 иду на игру «Мафия» Кто хочет присоединиться, дайте знать
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @natalierte. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Масштабирование онлайн школ. Натали Эрте” (@natalierte), 210 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natalierte.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.