Народ, наш праздник!
custom 578069588211453565810

Channel
@natalie_rondine
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
820subscribers
-92 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003772803798 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @natalie_rondine |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 20 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/natalie_rondine |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 820 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 828 | -20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:05 | 848 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 866 | -21 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 887 | -24 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 911 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 912 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
344 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5780695882114535658 | 90 | 26.2% | |
| custom 6021375060424528042 | 71 | 20.6% | |
| custom 5785357137106441573 | 40 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5780813740312104998 | 39 | 11.3% | |
| custom 6023895046586110474 | 35 | 10.2% | |
| custom 6023628904642645525 | 30 | 8.72% | |
| custom 6021651802347279814 | 18 | 5.23% | |
| custom 5780599438623903963 | 11 | 3.20% | |
| custom 5780650346871263345 | 10 | 2.91% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 344 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @natalie_rondine. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Народ, наш праздник!
custom 578069588211453565810
😐 Вот с таким лицом я переключаюсь на "Рассказ проигравшей". Так легко и весело писать про приключения пузатого демона, и так сложно и грустно опять отправлять красотку Лилит в мясорубку...
custom 602137506042452804210
🐱 ВНИМАНИЕ! ЭТО НЕ УЧЕНИЯ! Это реально завершение первого тома МВХ 😡 😋 Глава 20. Ключевая сущность 😋 Эпилог Вот рогатые и подошли к развязке очередной миссии. Правда вместо обычного отчета Эмбер придется напрягать свои семейные связи ради спасения, а Когтю стараться не превратиться в фарш. У обоих, кстати, получилось не очень. #го_читать #мвх
custom 602362890464264552510custom 57806503468712633453
❤️ Две офигительные новости на сегодня: ❤️Обложку МВХ уже рисует крутой художник ❤️Финальную главу МВХ вместе с эпилогом уже взял на вычитку крутой редактор Если что - это моя первая полностью законченная книга. Ну ладно, только первый том, но и его можно считать законченным произведением. Или конченным 🌾 Я. Просто. В шоке.
custom 602137506042452804213custom 57806958821145356587
✨ Всегда эта ситуация в фильмах бесила. Но раз я пишу развязку своей книги, могу и поменять финальный словесный бой! - Ага, разбежались! - заявил Кошачий Глаз. - Надеетесь, что я в лучших традициях клишированных суперзлодеев начну вам всю свою историю вместе с планами рассказывать? Меньше мультики надо смотреть! - Да бля, а я на это надеялся... - в сердцах сплюнул Коготь. #спойлер #мвх
custom 57853571371064415738
🐱 Народ, мне вот очень надо пояснить свою позицию по поводу негативных отзывов на книги руссоязычных авторов. Вы не просили, а я вот захотела 😋 В общем, я считаю, что если автор выставляет свое творение на всеобщее обозрение, это автоматически снимает любые фильтры на комментарии. Любого характера. Даже самые кринжовые. Просто потому, что это интернет. А в интернете, как известно, обитает куча разных тварей. Бывают …
custom 602389504658611047418
🤮 В этой книге мне не понравилось примерно все. Даже оформление. Оно красивое, но как только я увидела огромный шрифт и то, что около 30% на каждой странице занимают рисунки, я поняла, что вляпалась в треш 💔 Сразу поясню - Черное сердце фейри я начала читать до того самого скандала. Так что мой очередной плохой отзыв идет от чистого сердца, а не из-за вредности. Хотя честно, хочется и гадости навалить после увиденно…
custom 578069588211453565817
🎊 Начинаем заканчивать первый томик! Будет весело и поучительно 😋 😋 Глава 19. Разрыв шаблонов В этой главе Коготь вначале показывает, как умеет в стелс, а затем раскрывает тайны сантехники непосвященным девушкам. И все ради того, чтобы его вместе с Эмбер обвел вокруг пальца наглый кот! #го_читать #мвх
custom 578081374031210499817
😊 Правильно расставляем приоритеты при выборе мужских персонажей ❤️ #демонический_тикток #мвх
custom 602137506042452804223
❕ Народ, если я когда-нибудь начну также себя вести, пожалуйста, не скупитесь на киллера... Или хотя бы на вызов неотложки, чтобы меня в дурку от людей подальше увезли. Потому что автор, который обижается на плохие отзывы - это явная клиника 😋
custom 578069588211453565812
‼️ Вы не подумайте, я пишу. Просто немного не то 🌾 В общем, я подхожу к развязке первого тома МВХ, и там есть большой лорный момент. Настолько, что я его давно продумала и уже успела забыть. Серьезно! И передо мной встал вопрос ребром - нужно куда-то складировать весь лор, раз бошка такая дырявая стала. Старость, блин 🌾 Собственно, вот - https://rondine.fandom.com/ru/wiki/Rondine_Вики Чего мелочится, захотелось мн…
custom 578081374031210499814custom 57853571371064415738custom 60238950465861104746
☕️ Дружеское напоминание ❤️ #мемасы
custom 578535713710644157312custom 60236289046426455257custom 60238950465861104743
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @natalie_rondine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“rondine.lib” (@natalie_rondine), 820 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natalie_rondine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.