Channel
@nataliaagre
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
785subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001477205587 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nataliaagre |
| Created | 4 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nataliaagre |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 785 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 787 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 787 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
178 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 63 | 35.4% | |
| 😁 | 45 | 25.3% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 14.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 11.8% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 4.49% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 4.49% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.69% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 1.12% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.562% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.562% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2024 to 9 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Да, можно было бы и дискотеки для детей организовать в этот день. Хоть какая-то помощь от взрослых в поддержку романтических отношений высоко была бы оценена подрастающим поколением:)
👍8🔥8❤🔥3🥰2
Можно уже оставить детям день, когда они за последние десятилетия, с нашей же подачи, дарят друг другу открытки с признаниями в любви и приглашают друг друга на свидания. И так с демографией беда. Молодые люди каждый сам за себя и не имеют опыта проявления чувств. Да, праздник, не наш. Но он прижился очень нужными стране и молодым людям традициями. https://t.me/bloodysx/52157
💯8🔥4❤🔥3🥰1
Друзья прислали сказочную иллюстрацию «Похищение красного коня»:) Изумительно, не правда ли?
😁45🔥33❤🔥14👍5
А вам какой конь нравится больше? (Один вариант ответа)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗣Молодёжная лого-конница Думаем, Наталья Агре имеет право на искеннее удивление. Новейшая айдентика «Кода молодёжи» в виде красного коня от Артемия Лебедева крута и красива. Вот только Красный конь — это второе имя, многолетний бренд и даже назнание ТГ-канала Института воспитания. Который, в т.ч., активно работает с Росмолодёжью и шире — во внутриполитическом периметре АП. 🔙Красивый конь на фото слева — лого Инсти…
🔥12❤1❤🔥1
https://t.me/artlebedev/7432 Григорий, Росмолодежь , Вы серьезно?
👍9👀8🔥6🌚1
Posted without readable text
С Праздником России, великой страны с великой историей и великими людьми!
Сегодня в день защиты детей на первой премии проекта«Разговоры о важном» пришло время закрыть главу своей профессиональной деятельности в системе образования. Замечательные 5 лет в окружении восхитительных людей во благо подрастающего поколения и будущего страны. Всем огромное спасибо!
👍4
Легендарному «Артеку» — 100! Для многих и многих поколений детей дни, которые они провели в «Артеке», — самое яркое событие 🔥 Представить почти невозможно, но первая смена в лагере открылась 16 июня 1925 года! Спустя годы пионерский лагерь приобрел всесоюзный и международный масштаб и стал символом страны. С удивлением прочитал, что изначально в Гурзуфе… проектировался летний лагерь-санаторий общества Красного Крест…
⚡️⚡️⚡️ В Общественной палате РФ прошёл Форум Союза семей России «Общественные инициативы в Год семьи: взаимодействие институтов гражданского общества и государства». 💬 Ольга Петрова, замглавы Минобрнауки РФ: «Студенчество — это период, когда мы закрепляем семейную ценность, когда мы прививаем осмысление, что семья должна быть, содействуем созданию семьи. В этом году мы научились считать, сколько у нас семей. Мы по…
Замечательно! Достойный ответ повсеместному угару: пряничные человечки, адвент-календари🤦♀, навязшие в зубах Jingle bells'ы. Национально ориентированная среда и культурное просвещение вместе взятые. Главное, чтобы в любой школе, пусть небольшой и отдаленной, отыскался учитель, который расскажет ребятам, что именно они слышат. И почему музыка русского гения обеспечила европейской сказке бессмертие, о котором Гофман, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nataliaagre. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вам какой конь нравится больше? (Один вариант ответа)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2024 to 9 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 788,215 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@nataliaagre named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АГРЕ 🇷🇺” (@nataliaagre), 785 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nataliaagre.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.