Channel
@nastymikaya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
121subscribers
+34 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002364938023 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nastymikaya |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nastymikaya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 121 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 120 | +33 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 87 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 87 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
57 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 45.6% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 10.5% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 8.77% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 8.77% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 5.26% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 3.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nastymikaya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
И в такие моменты особенно важно не ругать себя за несделанное, а например распаковывать подарки и радоваться новому сервизу в цветочек из ЗЯ в 30 лет, просто помнить, что даже если планы изменились - это не значит, что я ничего не сделала. Иногда уже само то, что ты адаптируешься и продолжаешь идти дальше - это тоже большое достижение.
❤6🥰2😍2
Я вообще человек-план. Обожаю заметки, ежедневники, списки дел, галочки напротив выполненного. Но если честно, как думаете, за этот год я хоть что-то выполнила из того, что планировала? Я понимаю, что сейчас многое временно. Поэтому просто живу по режиму ребенка, подстраиваюсь, принимаю, жду. Но иногда, если честно, очень сложно смириться с тем, что от тебя почти ничего не зависит. Когда ты привык всё планировать, …
😁3🤣2
Цель была, первый раз за лето погулять по туристическим местам с ребенком, цель: не выполнена, ребенок закатил истерику и мы сбежали, но зато вкусно пообедали ♥️
❤5❤🔥2👍2🥰1
Кажется, в Москве уже веет осенью. Воздух стал другим - прохладнее, тише, глубже. Август такой август: немного грусти, немного света, и очень много чувства, что вот-вот что-то начнётся..
❤6🥰2😍2
Что понравилось:😊 - хорошо отпаривает вещи(но легкие ткани, хлопок, лен) - есть минимальный режим на 10 минут, (что очень удобно, когда нужно быстро освежить одежду) - особенно классно, если дома есть ребенок: можно не переживать, что случайно обожжешь его, как это бывает с обычным утюгом Что не очень удобно: - нужно крепить утяжелители, и в этих местах остаются заломы - сама система довольно объемная, поэтому заним…
❤5👏2🥰1
Вот такой подарок мы получили от моей мамы и бабушки на день рождения - паровая система Tefal Care For You 💛 Если честно, в моих мечтах это было что-то из серии: повесил вещь на плечики, и она сама красиво разгладилась без утюга, без доски и без лишних усилий. И в целом, это очень близко к реальности. Сейчас расскажу 🤌🏼😀
❤4💯2😍1
Всем привет! Сегодня жду доставку одной вещи домой- я давно о ней мечтала, но всё думала, что она мне, наверное, не нужна и бесполезна 😄 А потом решила: ну а почему бы и нет? Как думаете, что это может быть?
🔥3🤔2😁2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @nastymikaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анастасия Микая” (@nastymikaya), 121 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastymikaya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.