Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Вязание с мурчанием

Channel

Вязание с мурчанием

@nastya_cr0chet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

293subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002072516388
TypeChannel
Username@nastya_cr0chet
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nastya_cr0chet

Growth

291294292.57 August 2026 — 292 subscribers8 August 2026 — 292 subscribers15 August 2026 — 291 subscribers23 August 2026 — 294 subscribers29 August 2026 — 292 subscribers9 September 2026 — 291 subscribers18 September 2026 — 293 subscribers2937 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 291–294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 04:56293+2
9 Sept 2026, 04:39291-1
29 Aug 2026, 20:43292-2
23 Aug 2026, 01:44294+3
15 Aug 2026, 00:43291-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:16292no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:31292first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 27 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

222 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 536169635323367373013359.9%
custom 53597825716411527543917.6%
custom 53843229152588753313314.9%
custom 5384429872829448774177.66%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2025 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jun 2026, 10:09 UTC313 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ребята, я правда еще вяжу и мне все еще это интересно это 😁есть кто живой тут? Я в начале зимы купила два мотка акрила, думая превратить их в шарф, но это оказалось так скучно, когда монотонно вяжешь резинку и все, ничего не происходит.. поэтому я отбросила эту идею в долгий ящик, пока мне вновь не пришла мысль дать этой пряже новый шанс в виде платка , я его почти довязала, тк спицы 12 мм, хоть вспомнила, как это пр

custom 536169635323367373022custom 535978257164115275414custom 538432291525887533111

15 Apr 2026, 08:26 UTC440 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пока я мучаюсь со своим коричневым изделием, давайте посмотрим на белое облако, которое я довязала сто тысяч лет назад, но начала активно носить лишь в Сеуле, когда спрятала кончики и провела вто. Идеальный, мягкий, легкий, связан по мк @yefancy . Все было предельно легко и понятно объяснено, как и в любом мк, который написала Юля. Небольшой спойлер, после того, как расквитаюсь с коричневым свитером, начну вязать сво

custom 536169635323367373019custom 535978257164115275410custom 53844298728294487748

21 Mar 2026, 14:53 UTC516 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Закончила спинку, приступаю к передней части🤪 Поражает, что спинку я связала за 3(?) дня работы. Дорвалась до вязания 🤓

custom 536169635323367373011

20 Mar 2026, 06:55 UTC481 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Открыла сезон вязания на улице, господа! Прогресс моего процесса виден на фото! Вчера толком не вязала, сегодня надеюсь получится побольше продвинуться 🐾 #процесс

custom 536169635323367373017custom 53597825716411527542

18 Mar 2026, 08:31 UTC446 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Петелька к петельке растет потихоньку мое новое изделие #процесс Что если каждый день публиковать то, сколько провязано? А заодно посмотреть сколько времени займет создание изделия🧐 раньше я так делала, когда осваивала вязание носков

custom 536169635323367373012custom 53843229152588753315custom 53597825716411527544

12 Mar 2026, 03:40 UTC489 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Была проведена разведка в пряжный магазин🤓

custom 536169635323367373018custom 53597825716411527549custom 53843229152588753319

11 Mar 2026, 03:35 UTC450 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пока два месяца в канале ничего не писала, успела перебраться в Корею. Так что пряжа не с вб, а с местных маркетплейсов, как и виды за окном теперь сеульские. Вот такие пироги Спустя долгие дни выбора пряжи все таки решила заказать уже хоть что нибудь, сегодня приехал заказ . Буду вязать сперва тест образец, чтобы понимать, как она себя ведет. А желтая пряжа была положена в подарок. Я ее не заказывала. Честно, вообще

custom 536169635323367373017custom 53844298728294487749custom 53843229152588753318

27 Dec 2025, 10:50 UTC≈1,170 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Где вязание, там и выгорание. Они ходят друг с другом под руку и не забывают сопровождать. Но вроде бы я снова скинула пепел со своих плеч и мне хочется творить, но так знаете, осторожно. В этом году я очень поздно поставила елку, но она мне придала настроения и вдохновения показать свои вязаные работы, над которыми я работала, работала и доработала. Между прочим, я уже давно ношу, но не хвастаюсь. Пора исправляться

custom 536169635323367373017

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @nastya_cr0chet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

✨ SCARO ✨
@ScaroPaintJob · 26,114
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вязание с мурчанием” (@nastya_cr0chet), 293 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastya_cr0chet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.