Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

nastyx🤍

@nastii68

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

37subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003683842592
TypeChannel
Username@nastii68
Descriptionпривет! добро пожаловать в канал)🤍 здесь будут: новости о пд видео,с моего аккаунта лайка,и пинтерест запросы и тд. подпишись пожалуйста.🙏🩷 гл. адм.: @maliii75 вп стоит час мой анон: @nastiicsbot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 15 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nastii68

Growth

379 Aug 2026, 23:46 — 37 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 21:17 — 37 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 23:4610 Aug 2026, 21:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36–38 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:1737no change
9 Aug 2026, 23:4637first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
22
Videos
25
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 03s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰333.3%
222.2%
❤‍🔥222.2%
💔222.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 May 2026, 17:43 UTC22 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

::ребята извините я продаю канал((

💔2

Signed слей мали.

5 May 2026, 20:03 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

✧°•new post°•✧ ::влд: гл. влд. Мали ::юз гл. влд.: @maliiixc ::брать идею в свои тгк с отметкой ::наша отметка: @nastii68 Веник сигма,просто🙏🙏

1❤‍🔥1🥰1

Signed мали?

5 May 2026, 19:16 UTC30 viewsread 10 August 2026

::ребята извините что я совсем не выкладываю ничего,я про вас не забыла просто очень много уроков((

Signed мали?

22 Apr 2026, 18:59 UTC62 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

ураааа новый пост) давно видео не было сори не за актив((😕

🥰21❤‍🔥1

Signed мали

22 Apr 2026, 15:46 UTC44 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://t.me/+jo6wj2Spd5c0NGQy в этом канале серии

Signed мали

22 Apr 2026, 15:45 UTC36 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @SivanastVideo

А ЭТО ТВОЙ КТОЧТО??? спойлер к 12 серии она будет в моем канале: https://t.me/+M1ZP8Q6Xaio3NTMy

Signed мали

21 Apr 2026, 11:11 UTC33 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

::момент когда Даша разбила папину машину •материал брат строго с отметкой! •наша отметка: @nastii68 •серия и сезон в комм ::материал в комм

Signed мали

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nastii68. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,000,507 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“nastyx🤍” (@nastii68), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastii68.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.