Channel
@nasramoto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
43subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003709255926 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nasramoto |
| Created | 24 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nasramoto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 43 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 43 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 24 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
108 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 30 | 27.8% | |
| 😁 | 30 | 27.8% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 13.9% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 12.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 6.48% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 4.63% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 1.85% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.85% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.85% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.926% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.926% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Запустили ботов по фейр спредам, в скором времени расширим по биржами, % спредов и добавим другие софты. Одни из самых быстрых по скорости, лайв обновление цен и красивый график https://t.me/fairspread - мекс 12% https://t.me/fairspreadgate - гейт 12% https://t.me/fairspreadourbit - оурбит 12%
🔥6❤3👍3
TON лечайший лонг двф пампит через ликвидации шортов, тип открыл огромный шорт на хл - даже не знаю, что дальше будет! твх 2.3
👍4🔥2❤1
Арти дал колл в спредик, +1.68% за день с фандинга выйдет на токене, который может иксануть - сиди весь день доливай маржу в шорт, зато +1.68% получишь!
😁2
А вы и дальше пытайтесь водить в рестораны, ухаживать, дарить цветы, тратить время на комплименты и кульдское "добивание" когда любая Азиатка с руками заберёт вас На моей истории было больше чем с десяток Азиаток с джетами, тачками, и они просто ссутся от нашей внешности Вы себя недооцениваете мужички, наши телки не ценят вас ВООБЩЕ Сотни раз за меня платили в рестиках, оплачивали отели, просили переспать за деньг…
❤🔥1🤣1😁1
Понятно что надо строить крутой образ и иногда выдумывать, но не до такой же степени))))
❤🔥2👍1
Взял лонг(или шорт, похуй) - потерял из за того, что цена пошла не в ту сторону. ахуеть, как так? даже подумать не мог что так бывает! Взял позу с хуевым фандингом, зная что фандинг может стать еще хуже. фандинг стал хуже. ахуеть. ну виновата биржа! гандоны!
❤🔥2👍2
Бубубу маленький губу надул суд... су... судиться буду!!!
😁2🤣1
Илон маск шиллил пару токенов и пока что ни разу не упомянал токен дважды. А еще ни один токен(их всего 2) не улетал выше 200кк мкапы Если я за неделю посру три раза, то я буду срать каждую неделю ровно по три раза всю жизнь? Статистику в школе арти явно не преподавали
🔥2😁2❤1🤔1
Как в 2026 году можно путать понятие капитализации и ликвидности? Если я создам токен с: - ликвидностью 1 USDT - выставлю супплай 1,000,000 - цену 100 То это будет значит, что я теперь милиардер? (market cap = supply * price) Маркет кап в 40 млн НЕ значит, что в токене 40 млн чьих то денег
😁4👍1🤔1
"Спредик для лоубанков MEXC futures long Aster futures short $ASTEROID , + фандинг в нашу сторону Там чет 6-8% щас" 260 макс сайз * 8% = 20$. Арти приват. Продристаться. Ой. Подписаться.
😁6💊1🔥1🤣1
Им пора основать свое село "Криптаново" ну или может "Спредиково"
😁5👍2🤣1
Еще один квант и неэффективатор из мира сельских трейдеров
👍4🔥1🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nasramoto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гандоши Насрамото” (@nasramoto), 43 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nasramoto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.