Channel
@nasindaplace
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
299subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001431672723 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nasindaplace |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nasindaplace |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 299 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 302 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 302 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
27 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 8 | 29.6% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 22.2% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 18.5% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2025 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Kol v Kol. Launchpad dev v launchpad dev. Farm after farm. Shit shill after shit shill everywhere. Your favourite callers rugging you daily calling garbage on every chain. Euphoria and confusion daily. SHUT UP CUNTS. Bottom close?
🔥1
Favourite thing about this market? How shit and washed Kols are. Least favourite thing is how we would get crucified 6 months ago for selling on doxxed wallets and now it seems acceptable to call and openly farm for a 2x and exit liquidity with no mention of it. Market is fucked. Kols are shit. Eth has 20k toppers. Patience is a virtue. If you believe this new “cabal” is rich rich or Kols have big funds then there…
❤2
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
back at entry now, good entry for a nice slowcook
Aped this good team should slowcook up B91qnn4oz8RGGAH3KK8Z9LVkbvDyoyMWrgEqHeQupump
will go 500k at least imo
People still buying coin named penis. RIP
😁2
👀👀
Been buying $AIB all the way down. Around 2.5m atm. Could be bottom here and potentially a massive front run with the hats being released in a few weeks. https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x62eae8645b51146d262dca962e3ec00e84946475
Video, posted without a caption
🔥2
I’m turning 41, but I don’t feel like celebrating. Our generation is running out of time to save the free Internet built for us by our fathers. What was once the promise of the free exchange of information is being turned into the ultimate tool of control. Once-free countries are introducing dystopian measures such as digital IDs (UK), online age checks (Australia), and mass scanning of private messages (EU). Ger…
💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nasindaplace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NAS IN DA PLACE” (@nasindaplace), 299 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nasindaplace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.