Channel
@nasim_redglasses
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
79subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004409874795 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nasim_redglasses |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 1 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nasim_redglasses |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 79 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 76 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 76 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 75 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,197 |
| Reactions total | 45 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
45 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 43 | 95.6% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 4.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دوستان 1406 که این روزها درگیر مشاوره وکلاس گرفتن هستید👇 تومارکت کنکورهنر که هر دودقیقه یک مشاور ومدرس جدید زاییده میشه حتما باچشم باز پکیج بگیرید(: درباره نتایج،سابقه تحصیلی،دانشگاه ورضایت به خوبی تحقیق کنید. قطعا کسی که تلاش خاصی برای کنکورخودش نکرده وبوق بوقستان قبول شده نمیتونه راهنمای مفیدی براتون باشه عجیب تراینکه یک سری کانال هایی عین قارچ بیرون میان که معلوم نیست اصلا شخص پشتشتون کیه وچی خونده وچی کارکرده…
بچههایی که تازه به جمعمون اضافه شدین، خیلی خوش اومدین ❤️ لطفا از پیام اول که ریپلای شده، محتواهای کانال رو مطالعه کنین 🫡🌟
❤2
سوال شما: واجبه برای همه درسها کلاس بردارم؟ کلاس دقیقا چه کاری برام انجام میده؟ خیلیها وقتی به کلاس فکر میکنن، اولین چیزی که به ذهنشون میرسه اینه که خب یه نفر درس رو برام توضیح میده. و خب الان توی اینترنت برای خیلی از درسها آموزش رایگان پیدا میشه. جزوه هست، ویدئو هست، نمونهتدریس هست. پس چرا بعضیها با اینکه کلی آموزش رایگان دیدن، اما باز هم جلو نمیرن؟ 🌟 یکی مشکلش اینه که نمیدونه هر هفته چقدر باید درس بخون…
❤2
بچهها ببینین مشکل خیلیهاتون کمبود منبع نیست؛ نداشتن یک سیستمه! الان دیگه: کتاب هست؛ جزوه هست؛ ویدئو آموزشی هست؛ نمونهبرنامه هم تا دلت بخواد پیدا میشه. ولی بازم آخر هفته میرسی و میبینی: تاریخ هنر رو خوندی، اما مرور نکردی. دو جلسه ریاضی دیدی، ولی تستهاش مونده. خواص مواد رو شروع کردی، ولی نمیدونی ادامهش رو کی بخونی. یه درس هم کلا از برنامه جا افتاده، چون هر بار کارهای فوریتر جاش رو گرفتن. اینجا معمولا فکر می…
❤2
🛤 این مسیر رو داریم با هم میسازیم؛ تا آموزش کنکور هنر، کمکم شبیه چیزی بشه که واقعا لیاقتش رو دارید. ❤️
❤3
برای همین نسخهی آمادهای وجود نداره که بگیم: اول این سه درس، بعد این دوتا، و فلان درس هم از زمستون. چیزی که باید پیدا کنی اینه: کدوم درس برای تو دیرجمع میشه؟ کدوم درس حجیمه و باید از الان کمکم همراهت باشه؟ و کدوم درس رو میتونی فعلا با حجم سبکتری وارد برنامه کنی؟ لزومی نداره همهی درسها رو با شدت یکسان شروع کنی. ممکنه یک درس سهم اصلی هفتهات باشه، یکی فقط دو جلسهی کوتاه داشته باشه، و یکی فعلا در حد آشنایی و …
❤5
از اون طرف، تاریخ هنر و درک عمومی هنر هم درسهایی نیستن که بشه حجم زیادی از اسمها، دورهها، آثار و تصویرها رو گذاشت برای آخر مسیر. میتونی یک عالمه مطلب بخونی، ولی اگه فرصت مرور و برگشتن بهشون رو نداشته باشی، نزدیک کنکور حس میکنی همهچیز رو قبلا دیدی و هیچچیز رو دقیق یادت نیست. اما این به این معنی نیست که بقیهی درسها رو ببوسی بذاری کنار. مثلا ممکنه کسی سالها موسیقی کار کرده باشه و شروع این درس براش سبکتر با…
❤2
کدوم درس رو اگه دو سه ماه عقب بندازی، بعدا چقدر گرون برات تموم میشه؟ مثلا ریاضی و فیزیک برای خیلیها از اون درسهاییه که با یک خیلی سریع و راحت جمع نمیشه. اگه پایهات ضعیفه، هرچقدر عقبش بندازی، فقط ترست ازش بیشتر میشه. بعد هم یکدفعه میرسی به جایی که با خودت میگی: دیگه وقت نیست؛ کلا حذفش میکنم. اما حذف کردن کل یه درس، مساویه با خداحافظی با دانشگاههای دولتی :)) 🌟 درحالیکه شاید اگر از الان هفتهای چند ساعت آ…
❤2
سوال شما از کدوم درس شروع کنم؟ اول تاریخ هنر رو شروع کنم یا ریاضی؟ موسیقی رو بذارم برای بعد؟ همه میگن خواص مواد جمعشدنیه؛ واقعاً هست؟
❤2
سوال شما کتاب های که سازمان سنجش برای مطالعه خلاقیت تصویری اعلام کرده رو لطف میکنید بگید چیه و از چه پایه ای ؟ و فقط همین کتاب ها رو باید بخونیم؟ این لیست منابع خلاقیت تصویری کنکور ۱۴۰۵ هست و سازمان سنجش هنوز برای کنکور ۱۴۰۶ رو اعلام نکرده. اما تغییر عجیب و غریبی نخواهد داشت؛ منتها توجه کنین: اگر میخواید منابع رو بخرید، فعلا دست نگه دارید که کاملا با سال چاپ اعلامی سازمان سنجش منطبق باشه. و بله! همین کتابها + کتا…
❤2
سوال شما چطوری بفهمیم داخل درس ریاضی فیزیک تو چه سطحی هستیم ؟ و از کجا باید داخل این کلاس ها ثبت نام بکنیم و کی شروع میشه؟ و هیچ کتابی پس با توجه به ویستون تهیه نکنیم و داخل کلاس فقط شرکت بکنیم؟ به زودی یک آزمون تعیین سطح ریاضی برگزار میکنیم؛ بعد اون آزمون بهتون میگم که با توجه به سطحتون برای ریاضی چی کار کنین و کدوم سطح کلاسهای ریاضی من رو ثبت نام کنین 🌟 فعلا کتاب تهیه نکنین تا بعد آزمون تعیین سطح با هم صحبت کنیم.…
❤3
اما یک قانون برای همه هست: هر چیزی رو که شروع میکنی، باید بدونی هفتهی بعد چطور میخوای ادامهش بدی؛ نه اینکه امروز سه ساعت با انگیزه بخونیش و بعد تا دو هفته سراغش نری. شروع خوب اونیه که وقتی هیجان روزهای اول خوابید، هنوز بتونی ادامهش بدی. حالا سوال اینه: بین درسهای تخصصی، کدومها باید زودتر وارد برنامهات بشن و کدومها میتونن کمی صبر کنن؟ این جواب رو مشاوری بهت میده که برات برنامه شخصیسازی شده مینویسه!
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nasim_redglasses. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
الان کجای مسیر کنکور هنر ۱۴۰۶ ایستادی؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 206,602 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اتاق فرمان کنکور ۱۴۰۶ | نسیم خاتمی” (@nasim_redglasses), 79 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nasim_redglasses.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.