https://t.me/shodbelarus/441

Channel
Коалиция делегатов СХОДА
@nashshod
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
57subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001291597267 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nashshod |
| Description | Делегаты СХОДа в Коалиции: 1. Алексей Деревяго 2. Донсков Юрий с кандидатами Дечко Андреем и Артуром Павлючуком 3. Сергей Шалыгин 4. Максим Палий 5. Владимир Мацкевич Связь с делегатами: @nash_shod_bot |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nashshod |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 57 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 57 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 27
- Links
- 98
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
https://t.me/honestpeople_by/3934
https://t.me/shodbelarus/425
https://t.me/shodbelarus/422
Коалиция делегатов СХОДА pinned «Этот опрос очень важен для Схода, ответьте пожалуйста на него»
Если в этом году состоятся выборы в единый преставительный орган демократических сил с обязательным характером решений, то примете ли вы участие в голосовании за кандидатов в такой орган?
- Да, буду голосовать80%
- Да, И буду выдвигаться сам2%
- Не буду голосовать6%
- Затрудняюсь ответить12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
3. По вашему мнению, должны ли решения такого представительного органа иметь силу законов для всего беларусского общества "Новой Беларуси"(Тех, кто за честные выборы, за наказание виновных и освобождение невиновных), в частности для Вас лично.
- Да, должны58%
- Нет, не должны20%
- Затрудняюсь ответить22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
По вашему мнению, должны ли решения такого представительного органа носить обязательный характер для Светланы Тихановской и её кабинета, НАУ, Координационного совета?
- Да, должны46%
- Нет, не должны25%
- Затрудняюсь ответить29%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Этот опрос очень важен для Схода, ответьте пожалуйста на него
1. Согласны ли вы с утверждением: "В Беларуси нужен единый представительный орган всего демократического движения, формируемый прямым голосованием граждан?"
- Да, согласен65%
- Нет, не согласен10%
- Затрудняюсь ответить24%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
💡 Один из делегатов СХОДа анонимно создал канал для борьбы с пропагандой Там он будет развенчивать мифы и манипуляций пропаганды, знание механик которой пригодится в общении со сторонниками режима и неактивной частью населения нашей страны, так как исследования показывают, что обе эти категории не умеют отличать фейки от правды. ❗Первый текст уже доступен по ссылке https://t.me/ProDobroShod/4 Подписывайтесь! Диал…
3 августа на платформе СХОД пройдут публичные слушания по разделам Конституции Новой Беларуси с участием представителей Общественной конституционной комиссии. 📃 Тема слушаний: «Права человека» Делегаты первого созыва СХОДа хотят вовлечь в обсуждение максимум граждан, чтобы каждый мог высказаться — гражданское общество должно существовать и должно быть услышано. Пожалуйста, все вопросы и предложения отправляйте в ча…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nashshod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Если в этом году состоятся выборы в единый преставительный орган демократических сил с обязательным характером решений, то примете ли вы участие в голосовании за кандидатов в такой орган?
- Да, буду голосовать80%
- Да, И буду выдвигаться сам2%
- Не буду голосовать6%
- Затрудняюсь ответить12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
3. По вашему мнению, должны ли решения такого представительного органа иметь силу законов для всего беларусского общества "Новой Беларуси"(Тех, кто за честные выборы, за наказание виновных и освобождение невиновных), в частности для Вас лично.
- Да, должны58%
- Нет, не должны20%
- Затрудняюсь ответить22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
По вашему мнению, должны ли решения такого представительного органа носить обязательный характер для Светланы Тихановской и её кабинета, НАУ, Координационного совета?
- Да, должны46%
- Нет, не должны25%
- Затрудняюсь ответить29%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
1. Согласны ли вы с утверждением: "В Беларуси нужен единый представительный орган всего демократического движения, формируемый прямым голосованием граждан?"
- Да, согласен65%
- Нет, не согласен10%
- Затрудняюсь ответить24%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2021 to 21 February 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@nashshod named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Коалиция делегатов СХОДА” (@nashshod), 57 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nashshod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.