Channel
@nasdaqprinter
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
511subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002145747933 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nasdaqprinter |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nasdaqprinter |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 511 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 512 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 511 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 510 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
84 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 19.0% | |
| 💔 | 13 | 15.5% | |
| 🤣 | 12 | 14.3% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 11.9% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 11.9% | |
| 🤡 | 10 | 11.9% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.57% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.38% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 2.38% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 2.38% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 2.38% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 1.19% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2025 to 18 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
拜登一辈子的感情，其实挺纯粹的，就2个妻子。第一任真的算是口吃穷小子遇见大美女的美式电影故事。 以前第一次看拜登纪录片挺惋惜这么漂亮聪慧的女子命数就止步在即将飞黄腾达的前夕。 她和拜登在海滩是同时一见钟情，尼莉亚为了甩开烦人的追求者谎称一旁的拜登是她约会对象。 #逗的是彼时的口吃穷小子拜登搭讪美女却连餐钱都付不起，尼莉亚在餐桌下面悄悄给他递了钱 那晚俩人相谈甚欢，走在路上拜登又蹦又跳还被一条石墩铁链绊倒。 当时拜登就对她说“我觉得我会娶你”，尼莉亚回答“我也这么认为” 确认交往后拜登橄榄球也不打了每周跑去看她，在他上博士期间尼莉亚还自创复盘笔记的方法帮拜登通过考试。 俩人婚后邻居小孩们也是特别喜欢他们，每次都是借口要看他家的狗狗来串门。 #最戳心的是尼莉亚车祸死亡现场，散落着大量当时帮拜登竞选参议员时的宣传单，就仿佛此人是命中注定要助他一臂之力却又匆匆离开的天使。
💔11❤4❤🔥3
📊 中美关税谁赢谁输？都不乐观，贝森特主导 💰 美国对中国的综合关税构成 (总体升到50.8%) 美国对中国的综合关税税率目前约为50.8%，由三部分组成： 🌟20.8% - 基础关税：2025年1月之前就已存在的美国对华关税，包括第301条款关税（这里会不同） 🌟20% - 芬太尼特别关税：2025年2月4日和3月4日生效，目前仍保留。 🌟10% - 对等关税：4月9日生效，目前仍保留。这是从原本更高的税率降低后的结果，暂停了24个百分点，保留了10%。 📝 第301条款关税的详细分类 第301条款关税分为四个清单，针对不同类型的中国商品： 清单1、2、3 📦：对约45%的中国输美商品征收25%关税涉及工业机械零件、医疗设备、航空航天产品、半导体、化学品、铁路设备、信息通信工具、家具、照明等 清单4A 📱：对约18%的中国输美商品征收7.5%关税涉及手机、笔记本电脑、平板电脑等(被免除对等关税的部分)、玩具及…
👍4❤🔥3
Photo, posted without a caption
自 1981 年以来首次，美元指数下跌超过 5%，标普 500 指数下跌超过 5%，10 年期国债收益率上升 10 个基点——仅在一个月内。这种组合自双底衰退时期以来尚未出现。
👍5
绿卡也要被罚款坐牢，不带EAD、I-94可能要坐牢+交5000刀罚款 2025年4月12日，美国联邦政府正式实施《联邦公报》第90卷第11793号公告（90 FR 11793），重申并强化了外国人随身携带移民身份证明文件的法律义务。 根据该公告，18岁及以上的非美国公民必须在任何时间、任何地点随身携带由美国政府签发的有效移民身份证明文件，如I-94入境记录、EAD工卡、绿卡等。未能遵守此规定者，可能面临最高5,000美元的罚款和/或最长30天的监禁。
共和党在职参议员汤米·图伯维尔 在 1 月购买了苹果看跌期权合约 自苹果公司股价下跌近 10%以来， 他的股价已上涨超过 100% 一名在职国会议员实际上在对他监督的公司进行杠杆对赌 同时去年在基本确认川普胜利后，作为川普的党内最忠实的支持者之一，他一次性减持12只股票 数据显示，11月15日，现任亚拉巴马州联邦参议员、美国参议院军事委员会委员汤米·图伯维尔（Tommy Tuberville）一次性减持了12只股票。其中，包括苹果、Adobe、强生、霍尼韦尔、麦当劳、微软、雀巢等知名公司。 过往8年其营收能力相比民主党Nancy Pelosi 更是弹无虚发， 哪怕是俄乌战争发生前夜的经典百万室友公司看涨期权，都是Nancy 奶奶无可匹敌的。 再一次验证低调的试金石， 其利用法律漏洞，寻找各路亲戚朋友的身份延期申报，这也导致大部分炒股人，无法跟单。
❤4🤣2❤🔥1
A Chinese woman visiting the US who was abducted by ICE in California was found dead in an Arizona detention center...
❤🔥1
川粉也许会松口气，因为中期选举大概会有6900万女性选民投票会受到不同程度的阻拦。 4月10日 刚刚国会通过的 save act https://congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/22 如果你是女性，残疾人，或者变性人，要注意你的投票权可能会在中期选举之前被剥夺，#这不是危言耸听， 新移民也可能会因为得不到原国籍的出生证明，而无法投票。 用最简单的话， 本身是为了防治投票造假，但是共和党议员要求， 当你投票时，你的 名字 必须 与出生证明上的名字一摸一样，然而因为美国大概有80%的已婚妇女婚后会跟随夫姓，这将不成比例的剥夺已婚妇女的投票权，民主党尝试加入exception，但是原版已经被共和党在国会强行通过，可以预计在参议院是不可避免的通过。 以下是法案细则，注意国会已经被强行通过了。 《SAVE法案》可能会导致已婚妇女，残疾人，变性人 不成比例地受到更多选民压制法的…
😱2❤🔥1🌚1
这账maga是算不出来，还是自己就没401k？
💔2😁2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥2
股市连续烧掉了万亿， 每个纳税人 平均财富消亡 5万美金+
🤯2👍1
他与 川普 为了 1500亿美元， 平均931美/纳税人
😭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nasdaqprinter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“暗戳戳发财” (@nasdaqprinter), 511 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nasdaqprinter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.