Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Наркофобия Confessions

@narkph

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

21subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002301884565
TypeChannel
Username@narkph
Description@narkophobia_bot
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 20 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/narkph

Growth

218 August 2026 — 21 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21 subscribers8 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–22 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 14:4621no change
8 Aug 2026, 15:3021first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
16
Videos
1
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 38s
Average length
1m 38s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1325.5%
🔥917.6%
👎611.8%
😁47.84%
😢47.84%
🥰47.84%
🍾35.88%
💔35.88%
💯23.92%
💋11.96%
💘11.96%
🥴11.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2024 to 12 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Feb 2026, 21:07 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Купил 2 грамма шмали сегодня буду в эйфории #тейк

1🥴1

20 Mar 2025, 00:49 UTC150 viewsread 11 August 2026

#СТОП_НАРКОТИКИ «Не повторяйте наших ошибок» В боровлянской СШ № 2 школьники по видеосвязи пообщались с молодыми людьми, осужденными за наркопреступления. Онлайн-встреча вышла эмоциональной. Сломанные судьбы сверстников тронули некоторых присутствующих до слез… Своей историей, поделилась 18-летняя Александра из Барановичей. Еще недавно заниматься сбытом запрещенных веществ она и не думала. - Год назад захотела ку

2 Mar 2025, 15:48 UTC133 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

Вряд ли вы видели это видео, но на самом деле оно снято мной и даже попало на новостные каналы, 2 года назад в Шоколаднице устроил дебош солевой наркоман и я заснял все на камеру

18 Feb 2025, 20:32 UTC131 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

хочу сказать: мне страшно представить каково это восстанавливать поток дофамина после наркотиков, если мне тяжело было восстановиться даже после энергетиков. я опять в этом болоте, увы нахуй, я монстропотреблядь и не могу не купить что-то новенькое вкусненькое. и это просто ну. кофеин-таурин-сахар. пиздец. #тейк

💯2

18 Feb 2025, 12:06 UTC115 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

у меня есть хороший друг, который сидит на легком, но плотно, я осознал, что в первую очередь человек не готов ментально бросить, если конечно это не тяжелые нарк, вторая знакомая сидит уже на средних, бросить может, но сталкивается с отменой, нет сил, энергии, ей кажется, что не употребляя она не сможет работать, человек отвык сам вырабатывать дофамин и прочие вещи, многое зависит от нашей головы, сам тоже сталкивал

🔥3

17 Feb 2025, 10:30 UTC96 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Наркоманы заебали Сначала употребляют и нюхают, якобы вот тяжёлая ситуация в жизни блять, а потом с другими людьми ещё и обсуждают и дают советы, чё за глупость? Убожества, если вы нюхаете, и нарушаете законы, зачем обсуждать и палиться? #тейк

🍾3🔥2

5 Jan 2025, 00:09 UTC128 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

я видел кучу пикч от художников где были типичные комиксы сравнения передача про животных будучи трезвым: брух передача про животных под травкой: ЙООО ЧУВАК СМОТРИ ЧЕ ОНИ ТВОРЯТ пиздец вам грустно живётся если вы не может найти фан в просмотре чего угодно с друзьями вот обязательно надо нахуяриться веществами чтоб было весело. или может это наоборот эффект из-за юзания нарко м. #тейк

1💋1💘1

5 Jan 2025, 00:09 UTC121 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

либерахи и вестоиды заебали пропагандировать декриминализацию нарко они сука никогда не жили даже с алкоголиками скорее всего если вы за такое ратуете ВЫ НЕ СТАЛКИВАЛИСЬ ФР С ЗАВИСИМОСТЬЮ либо долбите травку и считаете что все нарко такие же сука я сидел с челами которые в войсе на вебку закидывались колесами скатывание их поведения в аморфную слизь это самое дискомфортное что я видел #тейк

1

23 Oct 2024, 10:29 UTC304 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🅰️🅱️🫵🩸🩸🩸 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 — вы - женщина, подвергающаяся/подвергавшаяся насилию/домогательствам? — близкие вас осуждают? — некому высказаться? 🤩🤩этот канал для вас 🩸 здесь вы можете абсолютно анонимно рассказать о произошедшем, получив в ответ поддержку 🅰️🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 💋 шуня 🏁 вп 👾 марлен 🏁 🅰️🩸🩸🩸 ➖ нажмите 🤩 🩸🩸🩸➖ осуждение женщин, подвергнутых насилию/домогательствам 🤩

23 Oct 2024, 10:19 UTC238 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Вот что бывает когда тейки не пишете UwU

😢4

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @narkph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 960,389 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Наркофобия Confessions” (@narkph), 21 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/narkph.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.