Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 帝。 𝗡𝟰𝗥𝗞 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀

Channel

帝。 𝗡𝟰𝗥𝗞 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀

@narcodast

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003661413955
TypeChannel
Username@narcodast
Created30 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 2 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/narcodast

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

121312.57 August 2026 — 12 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 32 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 18:1613+1
12 Aug 2026, 05:3012no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:1412first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 30 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 58662850240215856435053.2%
custom 58641256519041110264446.8%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2025 to 22 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 9 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @narcodast. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 December 2025 to 22 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Feb 2026, 07:13 UTC728 views24 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

custom 586628502402158564313custom 586412565190411102611

30 Dec 2025, 21:19 UTC921 views29 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 586628502402158564317custom 586412565190411102612

30 Dec 2025, 21:11 UTC920 viewsread 12 August 2026

🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟

30 Dec 2025, 21:00 UTC814 views21 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Poll

🌟𝒘𝒉𝒐 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒕𝒐 𝒎𝒆?..

  1. .🤩𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟16%
  2. .🤩𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑟40%
  3. .🤩𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑒6%
  4. .🤩𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑘𝑒𝑟20%
  5. .🤩𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑟3%
  6. .🤩𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑑15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 586412565190411102612custom 58662850240215856439

30 Dec 2025, 19:32 UTC766 views20 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ。 ㅤ ㅤ۟ ꒰ֵ֪ ‌‌ ֪۟) 𔕛ֹ (֪ ‌‌ ֵֵֵ֪⳯⳯⳯꒱۟⳯ㅤ 🌟🌟🌟   🦷𝘒𝘐𝘚𝘈 ㅤ ㅤㅤׅㅤ 🤩🤩 𝄖 𝄖𝑰𝒕'𝒔 𝒎𝒚 𝑠ℎ𝑝 🤩🤩 𓎟𓎟 𝟕𝒘𝟖 🦇 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓹 ⌣⏜ ׄ ☄️☄️ ⃝᮫ ‌ ׄ ︶︶ ︶

custom 586628502402158564311custom 58641256519041110269

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @narcodast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Dec 2025, 21:00 UTCAnonymous Poll124 voters

🌟𝒘𝒉𝒐 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒕𝒐 𝒎𝒆?..

  1. .🤩𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟16%
  2. .🤩𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑟40%
  3. .🤩𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑒6%
  4. .🤩𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑘𝑒𝑟20%
  5. .🤩𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑟3%
  6. .🤩𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑑15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2025 to 22 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“帝。 𝗡𝟰𝗥𝗞 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀” (@narcodast), 13 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/narcodast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.