Channel
@narcissiumy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
185subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001941390025 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @narcissiumy |
| Description | Narcissiumy world – a place where ideas bloom like narciss flowers, real madrid decisively defeats barcelona, eveery gets bears, and ton escalates. boost https://t.me/boost/narcissiumy info @narcissbio owner @TrueMadridista |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/narcissiumy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 185 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 185 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
285 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5972165262177213011 | 65 | 22.8% | |
| custom 5969549262021728139 | 55 | 19.3% | |
| custom 5350702035819833989 | 42 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5967602477900503561 | 32 | 11.2% | |
| custom 5294160517944853381 | 27 | 9.47% | |
| custom 5199660985345934544 | 19 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5447491456002462889 | 16 | 5.61% | |
| custom 5467370707837018642 | 14 | 4.91% | |
| custom 5253478445983222118 | 8 | 2.81% | |
| custom 5449373854268954684 | 4 | 1.40% | |
| custom 5449408939856793430 | 3 | 1.05% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 28 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @narcissiumy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 November 2025 to 28 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💎 @narcissiumy + @nft_legendary 🎁 совместный розыгрыш на 🧸🧸🧸. 1. 🧸 by @narcissiumy 2. 🧸 by @nft_legendary 3. 🧸 by @narcissiumy 🏆 Победители: 1. galikanka (@Galikanka7) 2. Pеdro (@PEDROZENIT) 3. ROLL [The Hamster Army] (@ROLLSTANDOFF3)
custom 54474914560024628897
🏅 — пост за все ласт дни. 1. реал победил 2:0, очередные очки принесенные мбаппе. у килиана 13 мвп в сезоне, хотя еще январь. тут уже ничего необычного. барса победила, все еще -1. наверстаем думаю. 2. бобби прайм 2026 в лионе. вчера забил свой первый хет-трик, второй раз за 3 матча стал мвп, до этого гол и ассист соответсвенно в первых 2 матчах. играет он не в центре атаки, а справа. либо уровень лиги 1 проявляетс…
custom 54474914560024628899custom 54493738542689546844custom 54494089398567934303
🏆 — 6:1 пасаны, 6… объективно лучший матч команды в сезоне все сыграли просто на уровне, который они не могли сделать весь сезон. особенно думаю всех удивил вини с 1+3 и 10, мбаппе 9.3, беллингем 8.5, вот кто помнит когда у всего бмв были такие высокие оценки в сумме? или никогда? ну пока что игра арбелоа, не считая кубка, вполне хорошая. кстати я угадал про дубль мбаппе. а вы ниче не угадали…
custom 59721652621772130117custom 59695492620217281393custom 59676024779005035612
⚽️ — ночью мадридская пасанва играет с монако. 7. 🇪🇸 - 12 очков 19. 🇫🇷 - 9 очков хоть отрыв всего 3 очка, разрыв в таблице 12 мест, это говорит о том, насколько завтра важна победа. я сам считаю, что счет будет 3:1 в пользу реала, мбаппе забьет дубль бывшему клубу и мб беллингем, а от монако головин. по интерактивам, вам надо угадать победителя и счет, сегодня без автора гола. без реакции прогноз не засчитан.
custom 597216526217721301111custom 59695492620217281393custom 59676024779005035612
🇪🇸 — raul asensio prime 2026. уж очень бодро этот пасан начал этот год. 2 гола за 5 матчей этого года. до этого 60+ голов не забивал не разу. вот он - воспитаник Ла Фабрики. кто угадает тройку моих любимых футболистов (рауля там нет) с местами получит мишку. у каждого по 3 попытки, если до завтра не угадают, по 5.
custom 596954926202172813910custom 59721652621772130114custom 59676024779005035612
🥲 — ну и проиграли финал, но знаете, грустно, но не сильно. проиграли классико, лишились жестянки, которая дается всего за 2 матча, так при этом все решило невезение, просто не повезло, не забили что должны были. при этом играли намного лучше, чем с условным атлетико. конечно, тут скорее вина алонсо, зачем выпускать чуамени в цз. и не умение играть вместе чуамени с хейсеном. в этом плане я не переживаю, а просто жду…
custom 596954926202172813910custom 59676024779005035613custom 59721652621772130112
🏆 — седня классико пасаны… по мыслям думаю модель быть абсолютно любой исход, в зависимости от состава, от настроя, от тренера. думаю будет ничейка и серия пенок, которую заберет куртуа. по идее больше мыслей нет, только надежды. (хет-трик камавинги никто не отменяет) по классике, тому кто угадает точный счет и автора первого гола кину мишку. если реал победит, то кину тем, кто угадал или точный счет или автора пер…
custom 596954926202172813915custom 59676024779005035614custom 59721652621772130114
✅ — хоть и с трудом, но победа добыта. дальше барселона, а там будет поинтереснее. особенно понравилось, как сыграли 🇺🇾и🇧🇷, пасаны полностью закрыли все вопросы на своем фланге. счёт угадали, автора первого гола тоже, но это были разные люди, так что все без приза. погнали 15 реакций и 260 сабов до классико, и тогда там будет интерактив покрупнее.
custom 597216526217721301116custom 59695492620217281394custom 59676024779005035613
🇪🇸⚽️ — в преддверии мадридского дерби в СА, кто угадает точный счет полуфинала и автора первого гола получит мишку. для участия лишь подписка, реакция и коммент с предположениями.
custom 597216526217721301118custom 59695492620217281396custom 59676024779005035613
👑 — прекрасное начало года по мадридски. идеальный хет-трик от гонсало, 5 голов воспитанников и разгром бетиса. будем надеяться, что игра от команды не уйдет, как было в прошлом году. кстати заценивайте новые реакции: 💎💎
custom 596760247790050356113custom 59695492620217281394custom 59721652621772130113
🥶 — с новым годом пасаны. много нфт-шек и мишек вам желаю. среди комментов и реакций раздам новогодних мишек и ёлочки.
custom 535070203581983398915custom 52534784459832221188
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53507020358198339897
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @narcissiumy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,129,294 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@narcissiumy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“narcissiumy wrld.” (@narcissiumy), 185 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/narcissiumy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.