Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 南科一路 快讯

Channel

南科一路 快讯

@nankeyilu_news

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

391subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001443276816
TypeChannel
Username@nankeyilu_news
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nankeyilu_news

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

391396393.57 August 2026 — 396 subscribers8 August 2026 — 396 subscribers8 September 2026 — 395 subscribers16 September 2026 — 391 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 39 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 390–397 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 10:21391-4
8 Sept 2026, 04:39395-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:50396no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:32396first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 22 September 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

234 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6829.1%
😁3916.7%
🤡3715.8%
🤬229.40%
💩156.41%
😐156.41%
🥰156.41%
🤨83.42%
👏52.14%
41.71%
🎉31.28%
🤔31.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2022 to 1 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Dec 2023, 12:00 UTC918 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#深度 从邮件与通知中看大学防疫 https://nanke.suste.ch/2023/12/01/sustech-covid-policy-insight-from-email-and-files/

👍181

10 Apr 2023, 11:10 UTC≈1,500 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

大学拟修改作息时间表引争议 大学今日向树德书院的同学发邮件,提到大学计划在2023年秋季学期起调整作息时间(即课程的上下课时间)。新作息时间将每小节课程时间由50分钟缩短至45分钟;大课间由30分钟缩短至20分钟;小课间由10分钟缩短至5分钟,并在上午,下午和晚间各增加了一节课程,令上午第二大节课程的下课时间延迟10分钟至12:20,下午的开课时间提早30分钟至13:30,晚间的下课时间延迟35分钟至21:25。大学在文件中还表示,新的作息时间表更便于安排3学分的课程,即3学分的课程可以使用3小节课程的时间,每周教学一节而非现行的每周一节加单双周安排。大学还在文件最后提到「清华大学,复旦大学,浙江大学等,下午的上课时间均为 13:30」以尝试论证相关安排的合理性。不过一般认为大学更改作息时间的原因主要为应对大幅扩招后教室紧张的问题。 不过相关安排遭到同学的强烈反弹。有同学认为,课间五分钟根本不够学生上厕所和休息,更别说向教授

🤬6😁5👍31

28 Mar 2023, 13:26 UTC≈1,060 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

大学计划修改宿舍收费标准引争议 大学于今日向研究生发邮件,表示根据深圳市发展和改革委员会的文件,大学计划调整研究生住宿费标准。新标准涉及调整单人间、双人间、三人间和四人间的住宿费用,且除四人间外宿舍收费标准均有上调。大学表示,新生将自2023年秋季学期起实行新标准,而在校老生的收费标准待征集学生意见后决定。 有同学认为,这一政策只讲新政策,不谈旧政策,提高双人间和三人间费用,降低四人间费用,妄图混淆视听。他怀疑,学校可能的策略是让学生选新政策,但实际上学生无法再拿到老政策中的「2人以上宿舍补贴」(3人间500/人/月,4人间/800/人/月),学校可以省钱并扩招。若学生选择旧政策,学校可能会让四人间的老生全部搬到两人间,让新生无补贴搬到四人间,达到同样效果。 此外,同学们对学校征集意见的目的表示质疑,认为学校可能并非真正关心学生意见,而是在评估政策阻力,以“多快好省解决住宿问题”的名义避免舆论风险。 在知乎上,也有同学提

🤬16🤡10👏1

25 Feb 2023, 12:10 UTC964 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

大学再次计划开放校园引热议 随着中国内地与新冠病毒共存,大学不再因「疫情防控」而要求封闭管理。有市民于一周前致电《南方都市报》,表示作为大沙河生态长廊的一部份,包括深圳大学,南方科技大学在内的大学城区域应将校园对公众开放,以方便市民游玩大沙河生态长廊。大学在相关新闻见报后随即表示将立即指定校园开放规定,引发学生热议。 有学生认为“好的大学,没有围墙”,包括港澳地区,欧美的多所世界一流大学均为开放式校园且访客无需登记即可进入。也有学生担心疫情前开放日的公共物品丢失,性骚扰,推销,外来人员干扰课堂,随处吸烟等乱象重演。加之先前开学第一课时大学对报警的负面态度,学生担心大学能否有能力维持正常教学科研秩序,维护师生权益。 (图为2021年大学校园中大沙河长廊部分向公众短暂开放时,大学树立的告示牌) https://news.nanke.suste.ch/2023/02/25/university-plan-to-open-to-

😐15😁5👍1

20 Dec 2022, 10:50 UTC≈1,020 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

大学未再公布新增个案数量逾一周,今起不再要求确诊师生员工前往欣园隔离 大学今日(12月20日)向同学发通知,表示由于欣园隔离宿舍床位趋于紧张,即日起不再要求在校内出现COVID-19核酸检测或抗原检测阳性的同学前往欣园,在宿舍原地居家隔离健康监测至康复转阴即可。不过在先前的一周中,除非主动要求,确诊的同学也不再被强制要求前往欣园隔离。有前往欣园隔离的同学表示,隔离时大学仅提供了「清热解毒口服液」,数包中药汤剂和一支体温计,除此之外暂未提供任何退烧或镇痛西药。 大学自12月7日起通报首例COVID-19确诊病例,但在此之后大学从未更新过相关的校内确诊数据。有同学根据与大学体量相近的上海科技大学每日新增约百名COVID-19确诊个案的通报,猜测近日大学的每日的COVID-19新增个案介于100至500间。 2022-12-20 18:30 https://news.nanke.suste.ch/2022/12/20/unive

😁10👍2🥰1

16 Dec 2022, 02:02 UTC885 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

2022年12月16日更新: 根据合众国商务部网站的资料显示,大学机械系已从商务部【未经核实的名单】 (UVL) 移出。机械系或将恢复通过许可例外进口、购买受合众国出口管制条例 (EAR) 约束的物品的资格。 (本快讯参考了https://t.me/g0v_shanghaitech/244 )

👍111

14 Dec 2022, 11:59 UTC754 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

19:30更新:大学安健环办公室与今日傍晚回应相关事件,指「需要为校领导采购独立包装的维德牌医用外科口罩」为描述错误,实为「领导要求安全、健康与环境办公室为安保等一线工作人员采购独立包装口罩」;而大学购置的其余「稳健牌医用护理口罩」均能达到防疫要求。

🤡27👍2

14 Dec 2022, 03:45 UTC665 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

大学被曝为仅为校领导特别采购独立包装医用口罩 大学COVID-19疫情升温,但学校自本周起未有公布任何校园内的新增确诊数据。有同学在翻查大学招标网时注意到,大学曾于10月27日采购一批「维德牌独立包装一次性医用外科口罩」。并标注为「为校领导采购」,折合单价约0.396元/只。但大学平时向师生员工发放的口罩却仅为「稳健牌医用护理口罩」,且其包装上明确标明了「不能作为外科或防护口罩使用」,折合单价约为0.16元/只。 有同学表示,大学既然已经采购超过100万个普通口罩,应该足够包括领导在内的校园成员使用,不明白为何需要专为领导再次采购单价更高的医用口罩。 19:30更新:大学安健环办公室与今日傍晚回应相关事件,指「需要为校领导采购独立包装的维德牌医用外科口罩」为描述错误,实为「领导要求安全、健康与环境办公室为安保等一线工作人员采购独立包装口罩」;而大学购置的其余「稳健牌医用护理口罩」均能达到防疫要求。 2022-12-14

😁19💩15

9 Dec 2022, 11:25 UTC745 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

大学不再要求出入校同学进行核酸检测及返校健康监测 大学防控办于今日(2022年12月9日)发出题为《南科大疫情防控〔2022〕81号关于优化校园疫情防控措施的通知》并表示,自通知发出之日起,不再要求校内师生进行常态化核酸检测,且不再对出入校设置核酸检测时限要求,仅校内重点岗位的重点人员(保安,餐饮等)需两天一检。同时,大学也不再要求从深圳市外返回的人员入住欣园宿舍进行健康监测,仅建议返深人士在24小时内做一次核酸或抗原检测。 翻查过往资料,大学自今年1月7日实施第本年度一次全校核酸检测,于2月20日改为每日一检至4月末,4月末至8月上旬两日一检,8月中旬至11月30日再次要求每日一检,12月1日改为仅出校要求48小时内的核酸阴性检测记录至今。其中至少有189天要求校内师生每日进行核酸检测。是名副其实的「核大校」。 2022-12-09 19:00 https://news.nanke.suste.ch/2022/12/09

👍14

7 Dec 2022, 15:50 UTC≈1,150 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

大学校园现首例COVID-19确诊病例,仅要求同楼层学生三天三检 大学疫情防控办于今日发邮件表示,接到疾控部门通知,大学一名学生在校外就医中确诊COVID-19。大学在邮件中表示,目前仅要求「居住宿舍的同楼层学生、与其有过接触的人员」于三天内每天进行一次核酸检测,不聚会、不聚餐、不前往人群密集场所。并建议师生同学「以积极乐观、昂扬向上的精神科学规范做好疫情防控工作」。 相关措施相比一个月前深圳其他高校对校园内出现COVID-19确诊后的处置方式温和许多,相信与今日发布的「新十条」有关。 2022-12-07 23:45 https://news.nanke.suste.ch/2022/12/07/university-campus-first-covid-case/

👍12👏4🎉3🤔1

3 Dec 2022, 11:35 UTC807 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

「核都」无需核酸搭乘公交首日,大学仍要求48小时核酸出入校 因长期要求市民每日测核酸而被称为「核都」的深圳市,于今日早些时候不再要求乘客搭乘公共交通时出示核酸证明。大学所在的桃源社区的数家购物中心,也于今日表示只需健康码,不再要求核酸证明即可入内。大学校内的核酸检测也略有放松,从数日前要求的无条件每日一检放宽为「不出学校可不检测,出校需要48小时阴性证明,只有检测记录仍不能进校」。但相关通知并未以邮件或文件形式发布,而是通过辅导员或课题组秘书口耳相传被同学得知。 许多同学对此改变表示欢迎,并希望大学能够和区内其他小区及商场一致,在进出校时也无需查验核酸证明。也有同学表示,因大学已经连续超过100天要求校内师生员工每日一检,每日做核酸已经成为其日常生活的一部分,现在不再要求不出校的师生员工做核酸,他感到不太适应,因此近期还是会去每日检测。 https://news.nanke.suste.ch/2022/12/03/dail

🤨8👍4🤔2

22 Sept 2022, 09:00 UTC≈1,130 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

有同学响应「疯狂星期四」倡议 大学食堂吃出异物问题持续发酵,并于周三被香港媒体南华早报以《地狱厨房:大学食堂食物中的蚯蚓、烟头、电池的图片震惊中国(译)》为题报道。早前有同学提出「疯狂星期四」倡议,倡议大学成员于本周四(9月22日)尽量订购外卖或非大学自营餐厅出品的餐食。不过于周三晚上,有人在空间广泛转发一则一位教授的微信留言。这位教授在留言中表示,在大学食堂里有人吃到电池、蚯蚓的事件频繁发生后,又出现了有人吃到烟头的事件。他认为这在禁烟的大学校园中十分可疑,并结合南华早报「震惊中国」的标题表示,吃出烟头的事件可能「不简单」,并认为同学提出的「疯狂星期四」倡议可能会被「别有用心的人」利用。不过有同学则回应,如果吃出烟头可能是所谓「境外势力」投毒的结果,那么先前语出惊人的餐厅经理和以隐私为由反对在厨房装监控确保「明厨亮灶」的人士更有可能是境外势力,因为他们「故意做出违反常理的发言,激化人民内部矛盾」。也有同学表示南华早报作为香港

🥰141👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @nankeyilu_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“南科一路 快讯” (@nankeyilu_news), 391 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nankeyilu_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.