恭喜㊗️学员小Alex成功脱单! 很多事情就是这样,你做就有结果,你不做,就会一直留在原地! 咨询教学请看置顶消息添加南哥微信咨询🥹🥹🥹
❤2🥰1🙏1

Channel
@nange91yp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
12,998subscribers
+296 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001650473523 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nange91yp |
| Description | ——南哥,江浙人士 前91两百人斩俱乐部发起者 至今200+短期关系,30+长期关系 国家TOP100大学心理学硕士毕业 前世界500强企业Sales Department高管 原相遇情感创始人,旗下相遇APP已累计用户20万+ 一年前因抖音搭讪视频过火涉及多方隐私被封杀 多年实战专业教学,已帮助数千名学员(包括海外学员)实现情感自由 什么是约pao自由?一首打油诗共勉 人生漫漫路~潇洒自如! 往事成云烟~笑看人生! 醉抱美人归~戏弄红尘! 往事成追忆~嘲笑爱情! |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nange91yp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 12,998 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 12,996 | -16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 13,012 | -30 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 13,042 | +32 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 13,010 | +27 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 12,983 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 12,991 | +57 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 12,934 | +20 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 12,914 | +7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 12,907 | +17 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 12,890 | +19 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 12,871 | -9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 12,880 | +50 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 12,830 | +20 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 12,810 | +50 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 12,760 | +9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 12,751 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 12,742 | +15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 12,727 | +27 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:19 | 12,700 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (7 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,871 |
| Reactions total | 53 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
119 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 72 | 60.5% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 16.8% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 7.56% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 5.88% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.36% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.68% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.84% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.84% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.84% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.84% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.84% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
恭喜㊗️学员小Alex成功脱单! 很多事情就是这样,你做就有结果,你不做,就会一直留在原地! 咨询教学请看置顶消息添加南哥微信咨询🥹🥹🥹
❤2🥰1🙏1
学员周末连续🉐吃两个!!! 当你还在每天睡😴前刷着短视频对着那些“擦边女博主”意淫的时候,别人周末已经开始自己的性❤️福生活了,这溢出屏幕的性福感,不得不说,现在的零零后妹子远比你想象中的开放
❤7👍2😍1
老学员七夕节火热约会中🔥🔥🔥 又是一个pao火连天的节日❗️ 你还是单身一人❓
❤5👍1🔥1😭1
学员又是一场“恶战”🔥🔥🔥 有人说过:这个世界上只有一种男人不喜欢美女,那就是已经停止呼吸的男人。确实,没有男人不喜欢身材火爆,脸蛋娇美的女人,男人对性的渴望,是与生俱来的雄性本能,在当今社会,也成为了无数女人诱惑男人的资本。无数男人在面对这些诱惑时精虫上脑,无法独立思考,从来没有认真想过自己该如何诱惑这些女人!这也就是为什么女人通常总是处在被追逐的状态,享受被追逐的快感,却从来不让你轻易得到!
❤20🔥2👏1🥰1
恭喜在美国留学的老学员再次发力,又🉐吃一个北欧洋妞🥰,战绩+1,上演跨国炮王戏码👍 表面想好好学习一身正气的学员,实际骚的一批!哈哈
👍5👏1🔥1
成功最快的方法当然是找成功的人学习,前提是他愿意教,而且并不是所有的成功者都愿意教你,看似投入更高实则更小,自己努力先要一遍一遍的排除错误的答案,但是学习可以直接通往正确的答案,虽然也要努力,但这未曾不是条捷径呢;成功的人永远都是相似的,跟有结果的人学习,结果不会撒谎🔥
❤13👍3👏2
恭喜在深圳金融行业工作的学员成功搞定女同事🎉🎉 有些女生刚开始接触起来,会让你觉得她很高冷,捉摸不透,那是因为你没有具备快速识别各类型女生情绪窗口和“对症下药”的能力! 你绝对不会投资错的一件事:就是投资你的大脑,学习快速识别,洞察人心! 不管未来现在,你想做什么,都需要!
❤4👏2😁2👍1
有的男生: 跟女生牵手你他妈尴尬,跟女生聊天你他妈觉得尴尬,觉得坐在女生旁边你他妈尴尬,觉得跟女生搭讪你他妈尴尬,工作上跟领导提要求你他妈尴尬,做销售跟客户提钱你他妈也觉得尴尬,甚至找我咨询也扭扭捏捏,觉得也尴尬…… 你的人生就是《大写的尴尬》,小垃圾,不要来找我,继续躲在那当个废物,你不配拥有高质量女人,我这里不欢迎你!
❤4👍2🔥2
好消息:恭喜新学员成功破处!恭喜有了第一次战绩! 坏消息:第一次太紧张,123缴枪秒了,第二天就被妹子删了😄 半夜妹子主动约出去一起喝酒,顺其自然当晚就睡一起,对于这种类似的妹子,她们的激情来的快,去的也快,我们要在这短暂的时间里面 ,快速识别到她们的窗口,破除asd防御心理拿下她!
❤10🥰2👾1🔥1
约到过几个女生,难道就是你经常跟兄弟们去炫耀的谈资? 在两性情感领域中,让一个曾经的高冷女神心甘情愿卸下所有盔甲俯首称臣,把掌控权交到你手里,被你真正的征服,那才是真正的强者!
❤3👍3👏1
恭喜新学员小磊成功脱单!📣📣📣 上月底在某音本地同城上认识的保险公司女职员,两次约会后成功恋爱👩❤️👨,这效率杠杠的,脱单就是那么轻松!
❤4👍3👏2🤬1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @nange91yp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❤️91实战导师南哥把妹实战教学” (@nange91yp), 12,998 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nange91yp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.