Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

((𝖁𝐄𝕾𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐀)) : 𝕹𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐘 𝖂𝐇𝐄𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐑

@nancwheelers

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003403486231
TypeChannel
Username@nancwheelers
Descriptionинɸᴏ: https://t.me/infonancw ᴀнᴏн: t.me/voprosy?start=olcur
Created29 November 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nancwheelers

Growth

2813 Aug 2026, 09:03 — 28 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 09:17 — 28 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 09:0313 Aug 2026, 09:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27–29 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:1728no change
13 Aug 2026, 09:0328first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 29 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

360 reactions across 12 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53145070493363317488924.7%
custom 53121192665630836345816.1%
custom 54158274066131550693710.3%
custom 5312020851682464676349.44%
custom 5368548741626231456267.22%
custom 5420582648374376304154.17%
custom 5427327078468968831113.06%
custom 535720796208550400492.50%
custom 513637210820863732582.22%
custom 515904996073327972282.22%
custom 537784390555325103182.22%
custom 537967864686262482682.22%
custom 591351643148334536682.22%
custom 520170016709858465271.94%
custom 537785657141180647171.94%
custom 529434661458282504161.67%
custom 591353734797407688561.67%
custom 538001581897523086951.39%
custom 591343462094629179830.833%
custom 591361951069844955030.833%
2 further kinds41.11%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 360reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 November 2025 to 6 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nancwheelers. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 November 2025 to 6 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Jan 2026, 15:44 UTC223 views40 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒎𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒓𝒚 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🤩 ✨энси осталась в школе допоздна, работая над материалом для «Стража Хоукинса». Тема, которую она выбрала, казалась безопасной: социальная атмосфера школы. Но слухи о случаях агрессивного поведения Билли Харгроува и странные переживания Макс заставили её насторожиться. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✨анее она уже поговорила с Макс у дома Уиллеров. Макс зашла вместе с остальными ребятами к Майку, чтобы поиг

custom 542058264837437630413custom 53796786468626248268custom 53778439055532510317custom 52943466145828250414custom 53778565714118064714custom 53800158189752308694

5 Jan 2026, 16:33 UTC207 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

✨✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨✨ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🌘соблюдение условий коннекта. 🌘мне неважна цифра вашей аудитории, главное, чтобы дневник был хорошо оформлен. 🌘полностью не против общения в лс, буду только рада знакомству вне дневника. 🌘постоянные посты с веткой не требую, было бы просто приятно видеть упоминание/хотя бы один пост раз в неделю-две 🌘Предпочтительный персонаж - Стив Харрингон. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✨связь — анон.

29 Dec 2025, 13:45 UTC227 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✨ все чаще ловлю себя на том, что рассматриваю Хоукинс так, будто вижу его впервые. Не как родной город, а как место преступления, где каждая деталь имеет значение. Вот главная улица — аккуратная, почти скучная, словно специально созданная, чтобы усыплять бдительность. Вот школа, в которой нас учили формулам и датам, но никогда — как распознавать страх в собственных глазах. А вот лес… лес всегда был чес

custom 53145070493363317489custom 59135164314833453668custom 59135373479740768856custom 59134346209462917983custom 59136195106984495503custom 59109830149590294922custom 59114299707306874502

18 Dec 2025, 10:45 UTC205 views27 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 531450704933633174811custom 53572079620855040044custom 54273270784689688314custom 51363721082086373253custom 51590499607332797223custom 52017001670985846522

14 Dec 2025, 17:07 UTC232 views32 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

𝑨 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝑱𝒐𝒚𝒄𝒆 𝑩𝒚𝒆𝒓𝒔 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✨егодня я снова была у Джойс Байерс. И чем больше думаю об этом вечере, тем яснее понимаю: она для меня стала чем-то большим, чем просто соседка или мать Джонатана и Уилла. Мы вместе прошли многое и я понимаю, что вижу в ней вторую маму. Не вместо моей настоящей матери, а рядом, как тихую опору, которую можно чувствовать, не говоря ни слова. ✨огда я подошла к её дому, за окном с

custom 54273270784689688317custom 51363721082086373255custom 51590499607332797225custom 52017001670985846525custom 53145070493363317485custom 53572079620855040045

6 Dec 2025, 16:47 UTC241 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 531450704933633174812custom 531211926656308363411custom 53120208516824646767custom 53685487416262314563custom 54158274066131550692

6 Dec 2025, 14:44 UTC223 views41 reactionsread 13 August 2026

— «Знаешь, вчера в видеопрокат пришёл парень с кассетой, которую… ну… как бы… он сломал сам. И требовал, чтобы мы ему вернули деньги ‚за эмоциональные травмы.» — «Ты шутишь», — я впервые за день улыбнулась. — «Нет. Абсолютно серьёзно. Он сказал: ‚Фильм не выдержал накала страстей‘». — «И что ты сделала?» — «Сказала, что если бы фильмы сдавали экзамены на выживание, мы бы давно закрылись.» ✨ я засмеялась. По-настояще

custom 531450704933633174813custom 531211926656308363410custom 53120208516824646769custom 54158274066131550695custom 53685487416262314564

6 Dec 2025, 14:44 UTC177 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

𝑨 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝑹𝒐𝒃𝒊𝒏 𝑩𝒖𝒄𝒌𝒍𝒆𝒚 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✨обин… моё первое впечатление о ней было… странным✨ Я до последнего не хотела подпускать её близко к себе. Слишком резкая, слишком смешная, слишком шумная. Она говорит всё, что думает, прямо в лицо. Я никогда не умела так, а людей, которые умеют, я обычно держу на расстоянии. Они опасны. Они могут увидеть слишком много. ✨огда мы начали работать вместе, я уверяла себя, что мы п

custom 53685487416262314568custom 54158274066131550697custom 53121192665630836346custom 53120208516824646764custom 53145070493363317484

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nancwheelers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 538,447 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“((𝖁𝐄𝕾𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐀)) : 𝕹𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐘 𝖂𝐇𝐄𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐑” (@nancwheelers), 28 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nancwheelers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.